1,301

(56 replies, posted in Universal News)

The only debate about the pnap or lack there of is whether or not the comp planet coords were sent. They were. That's that =p

1,302

(56 replies, posted in Universal News)

lol you guys do realize DeathWatch and Colorado are known for this kind of stuff right?=p

1,303

(56 replies, posted in Universal News)

> orangeAutumnWindz wrote:

> OK Nolio so you're saying
that if I sign a NAP with a fam that says they need to pay 20 planets, then 1,2,10 or 20 ticks later I still don't have the planets, I can attack as I want without anything else? Without any consideration as to how long it may take for planets to be explored? If a NAP doesn't say clearly within how many ticks planets need to be paid, then that discretion is up to anyone to make? So a signed NAP can be voided anytime as long as planets haven't been passed yet? Is that how NAPs work now? Since when have they worked like that? If you sign a NAP, it's signed and done. If you want to wait until planets are paid for NAP to be in place, then you sign a ceasefire until planets are paid, then NAP. In this case, NAP was signed and done. It didn't say in the NAP anywhere that planets need to be paid within XX ticks, much less did it say within the few ticks that they started attacking again.

I don't care about the results or anything, I'm merely pointing out that this is not how things work, nor is this a good approach towards playing this game.


Yes orange exactly. Its how its always been. I mean, if I personally agree to a nap with someone and I sign my name then as far as I'm concerned the deal is done. However if I didn't get the say...50 planets I asked for after a week or two of signing then the nap is null and void. Obviously not the case here but just an example. In this case, its just a matter of if the planet coords were sent or not. If so then the deal is set regardless of if they were taken or not. You held up your end of the bargain. If not, then yes they can revoke the nap deal as the terms weren't met to have the nap finalized. This is why I don't usually sign naps. You gotta make sure the family as a whole agrees to it. You need to make sure the terms are agreed upon by both fams and that the terms are met. Then you sign the nap with each appropriate representative. Anything else = fail.

1,304

(56 replies, posted in Universal News)

lol I'm just reading what the nap says.  If the planets were paid then the Pnap was in place. If they weren't, then there was no nap.

If the nap deal was for you to change your fam name to "We Suck" for the entire round and you don't, then there's no nap.

But in the end, if they broke it. It's only permanent to you not them:p

> BC Cougar wrote:

> Today 22:04:27

PP_
    Galactic Fighter

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

[...] off losers. bunch of wannabe good players.

Last edited by Torqez (Today 22:07:41)

Offline



PP_ is a good player, even better than you nolio ... on most rounds, so lets start wit respect, and learn about each other so we can better dominate the galaxy with all talents, and team work.... without one person thinking they done it all by themselves the egotist



lol PP is an ok player but not a difference maker. When he's in a good fam, then he talks about how he's the best and such. When his fam sucks, he spends all day spamming the forums about how he's getting farmed and them picking on little fams after he has done the exact same thing in the previous round. He shows few ppl respect. He spends most times bashing guys because they haven't been in as many winning fams as he. You're a good player when you can make a bad fam better. PP is not that player.

1,306

(56 replies, posted in Universal News)

Well technically if the planets weren't paid the nap wasn't in place =p

lol like you?

rofl

PP just stop talking:p

*yawn*

is there anything interesting going on where ppl aren't crying?

lol

1,311

(16 replies, posted in Politics)

I could use a grenade for the next time windows vista does something to annoy me.

1,312

(17 replies, posted in Universal News)

Neuch is having my babies!

1,313

(31 replies, posted in Drafting)

/ME nods

1,314

(18 replies, posted in Community)

X(

1,315

(18 replies, posted in Politics)

rofl

1,316

(18 replies, posted in Politics)

lol Simon

1,317

(42 replies, posted in Community)

who mods a multi????? X(

1,318

(21 replies, posted in General)

I'm starting to think Justinian is a homosexual =p

IC Death you fail X(

Who is Nai?

1,321

(15 replies, posted in General)

> Otto the Autopilot wrote:

> You're so dumb. Girls are asking for private "Study Time" and you're this slow to react???


LOL

1,322

(30 replies, posted in General)

he said engines not cars =p

1,323

(31 replies, posted in Drafting)

lol lyv

1,324

(55 replies, posted in Universal News)

Ok you know the drill. Lets keep it unbiased, fair and please copy and paste the category of which you are nominating when adding the actual nomination.





1. Best Diplomat:

2. Best overall SS player:

3. Best sor strategy 

4. Most aggressive player

5. Most planet fat player

6. Most honorable player:

7. Least honorable player:

8. Favourite Player:

9. Favourite theme/name/fampic of the round :

10. Favourite forum-poster:

11. Biggest drop:

12. Biggest surprise of the round:

13. Best strategy of the round:

14. Worst mistake of round:

15. Favorite quote of the round:

16. Most debated topic:

17. Dirtiest move of the round

18. Rate this round 1-10

1,325

(41 replies, posted in Universal News)

this is BS! Scorpion has never deleted before!

oh wait..