1,301

(107 replies, posted in Politics)

Reading this thread is more painful than anything being done in Gitmo.  X(

1,302

(41 replies, posted in General)

Ride out and meet them!

1,303

(41 replies, posted in General)

Uni could also mean one, like a unicycle!

1,304

(41 replies, posted in General)

This is about as poorly kept a secret as the Israeli nuclear program.

1,305

(4 replies, posted in Ideas)

Did either of you click the link?  rofl tongue

1,306

(21 replies, posted in Politics)

Indeed.

1,307

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

> Einstein wrote:

> I want you guys to move to the right.


Figurative or literal "right?"

1,308

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

Seriously... bad East!  X(

1,309

(27 replies, posted in Politics)

I veto that question, as it's asking a disclosure of personal information.  tongue

1,310

(17 replies, posted in Politics)

I hope Adam Smith don't mind it!  big_smile

1,311

(4 replies, posted in Politics)

Remember, that's in Boston.  Massachusetts is like... #3 state/district in the US on the ratio of lawyers to non-lawyers, behind New York and DC.  No, I'm not saying that means there isn't an oversupply of lawyers now.  However, the situation in Boston is not a good representation of the US as a whole.  Although I would agree that nearly all states have an oversupply of lawyers, the intensity of the oversupply in Boston is much greater than in most of the US.

1,312

(24 replies, posted in Politics)

OMG!  I just realized that Flint got called both a crazy libertarian and a crazy big government guy within 2 posts of one another in reply to the exact same post.  I always love when that happens.  tongue

1,313

(21 replies, posted in Politics)

> East wrote:

> lumberjacks are an integral part of the US economy, I discovered this in Colonisation



I love that game!  big_smile

1,314

(3 replies, posted in Politics)

> The Yell wrote:

> you lie, Irish never say yes to aynthing yikes



"Would you like another round?"


*disproves you*

1,315

(56 replies, posted in Politics)

Okay, are we all done here?  Back on topic (people who aren't me).  tongue

1,316

(56 replies, posted in Politics)

For the record, everyone, when Justinian offers money for "services," he isn't asking for legal advice.  smile

1,317

(9 replies, posted in Politics)

Oh, that suddenly makes your stance legitimate.  Nevermind!  big_smile

1,318

(9 replies, posted in Politics)

> V.Kemp wrote:

> You seem confused, Zarf BeebleBrix. For Obama, cyber security is hacking his opponents and tracking their internet activity with the help of the quasi-government company Google. tongue Of course he wants more of this.



That is... entirely tautological (supporting your conclusion by providing the evidence of your conclusion).

1,319

(39 replies, posted in Politics)

Your number: Amount of cubic meters per person at 10 trillion people

109,750,950



Wornstrum's numbers:
First of all, note he specifically says his number is based on 100 trillion people living there, not 10 trillion.

Then, his volume per person is 0.0108321km3

First, by reducing this number to a 10 trillion calculation, you end up with 0.108321km3 per person.

Then, converting this to m3, you get... 108,321,000m3


You: 109,750,950m3
Worny: 108,321,000m3

Yes... you are the 1%.

1,320

(39 replies, posted in Politics)

> ~Wornstrum~ wrote:

> Volume of the Earth (complete volume...including atmosphere, core, everything) is 1,083,210,000,000km3




> xeno syndicated wrote:

> Wornstrum, figure I found on volume of Earth is: 1,097,509,500,000,000,000,000 cubic meters

Where did you get your figure from?




There's not actually much disparity here between you two.  Why?

Worny is using cubic kilometers.  Xeno is using cubic meters.  1 cubic kilometer = 1 000 000 000 cubic meters.  So you're arguing over what is a 1% difference in the size of the Earth which is significant, but big enough for one to spot the other.


It's sad when an American is the one that notes this about the metric system.  tongue

1,321

(3 replies, posted in Ideas)

I want to be able to invest in Noir futures!  tongue

1,322

(9 replies, posted in Politics)

Well, hold on here.  We do know from budgets released before Stuxnet that Obama significantly increased funding of cybersecurity initiatives.  Additionally, unlike a full military offensive, Stuxnet is both something that gives the user deniability and invokes damage upon specific infrastructure without causing significant collateral damage or loss of life.  Maybe it's just me, but if you want to start this analysis with the preconception that Obama is generally afraid of instigating conflict (a stance which I would be willing to dispute, but that's a side issue), this seems like exactly the type of action he would authorize and speed up.

That being said, this is by no means an Obama-only party.  If the New York Times is correct, Stuxnet would have been a product of Bush Administration creativity, not Obama Administration creativity, in actually constructing the plot, establishing the plan/goals, and constructing the organization which would take on the task.  Given the report we have, literally the only thing that we can pat Obama on the back for doing is saying "Wow... that's awesome!  You should get more money for that!"  EDIT: I should add that Obama would get credit for actually ordering the attack... which is something, granted, but regardless, the point is that this may not have even been an option for Obama had it not been for the Bush-era planning/development phase.


The only other note I want to throw out here... Stuxnet is only the first of what my count says is 4 separate viruses based on loosely similar code (Stuxnet, Duqu, Stars, and Flame).  What kind of crappy freeware firewall programs are they using?  X(

1,323

(2 replies, posted in General)

Play nice, you two!

Closing!  tongue

1,324

(1 replies, posted in Politics)

Closed-Spam

1,325

(4 replies, posted in General)

Some intern was probably just fired from every job they will ever have.