Rev, you forgot an e at the end of "potatoe."
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Posts by The Great Eye
Rev, you forgot an e at the end of "potatoe."
I knew that one too! X(
It's a guy with a red bike helmet on!
Due to the sudden lack of content... closed!
Spam!
Like real football or that "it's soccer, but you silly people everywhere except America call it football" football?
Still counting votes!
It took Arby almost a year to count to 15. Lemme guess... you took vote-counting school in Florida? ![]()
ET and Ride to Hell disagree. ![]()
There was a bug that prevented people from being able to station fleets. That's been fixed.
It's not Rick Astley
*sigh*
This really lets me down.
*runs around and deserts this thread*
Should be fixed.
... Okay, who gave Arby too much sugar? One candy bar and he may log in and play a round actively... four candy bars and he starts endorsing Elder Scrolls Online.
I dunno who he is, but I have a sneaking suspicion he's never gonna give you up!
One more! Enjoy the big fams! ![]()
And another spot!
One spot has been added to each family in Starburst.
I vote we drag out this deliberation of the reasoning behind our dragging out of stuff, as the dragging out of this deliberation of the reasoning behind our dragging out of stuff would really drive ICD crazy! ![]()
Most of what you are saying should and is covered
by state law.
For political and power grab reasons the federal
courts are making a mess of things.
But everything you mention is financially based reasons.
Taxes are federal law.
Bankruptcy's federal law
Criminal law is both state and federal.
Moreover, don't forget that state law is regulated by the US Constitution. The 14th Amendment is what extends constitutional rights to cover state law, and the 14th amendment is the basis on which marriage was decided. This wasn't a matter of federal law. It was a matter of constitutional law that was specifically written to apply to state law.
Guys are not looking for equal rights. Guys are wanting
superior rights if it wre not so they would be asking
for a change in the law and not a change in the constitution.
Okay then. What would be considered "equal rights" under this case? What would be considered equal?
You are saying government should and does have a right to
have a say in marriage strictly for financial gain.
Not necessarily strictly for financial gain. A number of nonfinancial rights are defined in part based on marital status. Who determines what happens to a person who is unable to make their own medical decisions? Spouse gets priority. Can the government compel a person to testify that another person confessed to a crime? Exceptions may exist if the person being compelled to testify is the spouse of the defendant. There has to be more I'm not thinking of, but there's definitely a number of areas of law where special rules apply for two people who are married. They're not all financial (though a significant portion are). If the government can't define who does or doesn't qualify for those rights via some strict method (such as classifying people as "married" or "not married" via registration), the government has no easy way to apply those rules.
Okay then... what about the associated legal rights and rules that change in marriage? Are you saying the government has no right to define what individuals are entitled to, for example, file taxes jointly, have right to the assets of another person who dies, file bankruptcy jointly, be subject to special communication privileges in criminal law, etc.? Nearly every area of law has special rules associated with married couples. Doesn't that establish a state right to define who qualifies for those special rules?
Could you please explain, then, what made the Supreme Court actions with regards to Obamacare constitutionally inappropriate, and what, in your opinion, appropriate action would have entailed?
At you fool
Gay marriage was not part of the law
and it should not be. Government should not
have any part in any marriage.
Are you saying the government constitutionally has no place in marriage?
Due to the limited number of remaining player slots in Starburst, one new player slots was added to each family.
Imperial Forum → Posts by The Great Eye
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.