I propose to let doctors charge people whatever they want and not pay income tax on it.
And people can deduct 100% of their medical expenses.
And a doctor will get reimbursed by Medicare what Medicare says, but he can charge a different price for cash.

Because that's what's killing us, the idea that Shoeless Joe the Hobo can get his wisdom teeth out for $1111, and Medicare pays for that, and that's the same price Bill Gates must pay. 

Instead of making 30,000 people pay 100% of the operating costs with their procedures let them charge Bill Gates 50% of the hospital's budget to have that bump on his ass looked at.

1.  Thinkprogress is a Democrat propoganda website.

2.  Nobody says the Republican Party is free of liberal weenies.

3.  I have long considered Ryan to be a liberal weenie like Romney who embraces and seeks to expand the role of federal government where it doesn't belong.  For example, his budgets enforce the idea the federal government is ultimately responsible for providing health insurance, through vouchers if not Obamacare.

4.  If you're arguing Republican liberal weenies shouldn't get elected, no argument.

5.  The idea that "For instance, the measure encouraged states to “establish rational and reasonable consumer protections” by forming State Health Insurance Exchanges to give Americans a choice of “different” private “health insurance policies” and issue standard benefits, offering “coverage to any individual regardless of age or health.” The bill even included “non-profit, independent board” to penalize insurance companies “that cherry pick health patients and reward insurers that cover patients with pre-existing conditions.” It described the board as “a model that works in several European countries.”

Is somehow copying what Obamacare enacted, is Democrat propaganda.

Obama ordered all 50 states to set up exchanges, and then the federal Secretary of Health and Human Services orders them what to include in the minimum plan.   

This is totally contrary to encouraging states to set up rational and reasonable consumer protections to give Americans a choice of different policies.  Under Obamacare everybody in America has to buy the same policy.  Men have to have maternity care and women have to have prostate coverage.  The only "option" is to pay more to get MORE than what everybody has to buy.  Nobody can save money by skipping gender inappropriate options.

******** TOP SECRET****************
******** ARBY EYES ONLY ************
********DESTROY IF MISLAID**********
Arby why don't we just encode messages and leave them on the forum?

K thnx bail

********MESSAGE ENDS*************

Obamacare tax costs estimates only off by about 100%

http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/20 … s-are.html

Don't come to CA Kemp, they mandated by law that kids be taught about how Abraham Lincoln was gay.

"You're making the unsubstantiated claim that there is this HUGE terror threat of tons of people with nothing better to do than harm us. But you have no evidence of this threat, and little evidence of the inept and untrained threat that very rarely does attempt to attack us."

I have never seen a libertarian explain, or attempt to explain, by what right he takes a flying bomb over my head without my permission.   It seems to come to an appeal to authority, in that, if the FAA is willing to allow him to buy a ticket to do so, I the citizen have no say in my own safety.

Some of us remember how the flying commuter population (hereinafter, "asshats") let us all down on September 11, 2001.
That's the day the asshats, instead of doing the natural, obvious, and rational thing, grabbed the carpet and allowed thousands of Americans to be murdered. 

I mean it is the obvious, natural, obvious, and totally sufficient thing, isn't it Kemp?  You're urging us to rely on it totally.  Just totally trust the asshats to swarm the terrorists and we'll all be ok.

Thing is, the asshats didn't do that on September 11, 2001.

I believe in something called "freedom", Kemp.  I believe I am free not to trust you asshats ever again.  You already failed 4 separate times in a manner totally predictable to our enemies.

All you asshats have a debt to pay off.  You're NOT innocent people harming nobody else.  You're GUILTY, you're not even SORRY about it, and you DEMAND to be allowed to do it again without any adult supervision.

Not going to happen, asshat.  My RIGHT not to be struck by a hijacked aircraft trumps your covenience.  My RIGHT to life and liberty trumps your preference for customer service.

I already said what worked flawlessly without any possible violation of rights: ban commuter air travel.

That's not good enough, then, get in line and be searched.

My RIGHTS are not dependent on whether I prove to YOUR satisfaction that I am reasonable not to trust you and the other 399 people you never met before on your flight.  I have them without your permission.  I will not surrender them to make your life easier.

Who said anything about adult education?

Yes kids should be sheltered from the world.  Ass.

I objected to the "Exclusionary Rule" which was invented in the 1960s.
NOT the 4th Amendment.

No you didn't, because when I made a nice fat post quoting you as saying "none" and "0/3" you ran screaming.  OF COURSE you think it's something to be concerned about!!1!  How COULD I imagine you meant what you typed?

I quoted you. Also you didn't just question the significance and rarity of the threat, you denied it.

you said.  I don't know why you said that.  But you said it. You made a snarky repeat of it.

It's not a fact.  I said that for about 3 posts running.

You literally have no command of the English language.  You literally revel in absolutes and superlatives beyond their actual meaning.

Where we're stuck is your denial of a real threat.  You denied it.  You then argue you OF COURSE didn't mean what you type, and then use quibble adverbs like "serious" threat. 

I have quite directly said the absence of continuous boxcutter attacks doesn't prove in and of itself that AQ is not trying to attack air travel or would not if current regulations were suspended.  We'll find out since they insanely allow knives again.

I added that we need to examine AQ intentions through context.  And there, you fall right on your face, denying there's any real international conspiracy.  It's just people rightfully angry at the Federal Reserve and their corporate allies.   No harm there.

No we don't know that.  We KNOW people form systems and stand by them despite quite a lot of errors.  For instance, the Luftwaffe NEVER built a 4 engine bomber.  It figured that 2 engine bombers were more likely to survive.  They aren't, but because their surviving bombers were smaller, their raids dropped less tonnage over the target.
For another example the US refused to armor the Humvee fleet against roadside bombs for years.

So no, I don't know AQ is not fixated on aircraft.  They've had some successes with aircraft, and again, with air travel, the vehicle itself is a potent weapon.