you would laugh at something you dont understand? i guess idiots are used to that.

"I don't know how many people watching it laughed, but I'm sure a lot did, so the joke worked and your opinion on it is irrelevant."

yes, there was a joke in the show, i agree, but there was nothing for the people to laugh at that were in Alabama, they didnt see what was gonna happen in the show.

"Avo utterly fails because no one would find it offensive if someone else claimed not to like fried chicken."

and no one find it offensive that there are people that are gay, or that there are people that are liberal, ect.

you would be offending people by supporting a negative stereotype of them. trying to be funny by acting like a bigot, isnt being funny...  the friend chicken example is easier to understand. because its a single example and its race, which you guys usually are more sensative about. a car with friend chicken sucks painted on it driving in a predominantly black neighborhood, isnt only offending people that like chicken. you are saying they must like fried chicken because they're black. they arent failing to laugh at themselves, because the stereotype isnt true, they are failing to laugh at someone intentionally trying to piss off what they beleive blacks are.

"You are derailing this thread by doing it here, it seems obvious that you should try to follow normal forum etiquette by starting new threads when you want to talk about something else."

WFS and you are Derailing this thread. my posts have either been on topic or been responses to offtopic comments made about me.

"When I've been editing numberous posts of a certain player (wich were all modified just fine), and I see them doing it over and over, I just can't be bothered anymore.. As an fmod, you maintain the forums, we're not here to clean the shit up you left here.. It has nothing to do with politics, religion or even your very person.."

i dont swear more often then any other person, you have skipped over swear words made by other people earlier in threads to edit, a phrase out of my post because it contained "ass"; you have continuously showed a bias against me; and to delete posts made by a certain person because you cant be bothered to look for a swear word in the post absolutely has something to do with the person. your argument fails on all lvls.

the problem with india is they are democratic and the majority of their population are farmers, so they dont want to invest in the infastructure needed for large companies, because they're farmers and they want government money spent to help them, not big business.

> Wild Flower Soul wrote:

> We tolerate other parties than the one we like,

i bet if there was a huge mob of people marching off to a football game, and someone drove down the street with a car painted with anti-your football team messages, some of the people would throw stuff at it, if not do worse.

now, did you watch the game? i dont think the US was particularly lucky. luck was not the decisive factor. Spain had a bad game, they played like shit, and the US played fairly well for themselves, the US team was the better team this game, sure, the average performance of Spain would crush the average performance of the US team, but the US won because they outperformed the other team, not because of luck.

> Elrohir wrote:

> @avo, welcome to the wonderful world of football! The beauty is that things never go as they "should" be

i agree that Spain shouldnt of lost. but you cant just say that winning and losing has nothing to do with how good the teams are

> Morbo the Annihilator wrote:

> And im asking someone to close this thread

this is one of the most active threads we've had in politics in ages, why close it?