ahahahahaha!
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Posts by Justinian I
Einstein,
I disagree. Small/medium businesses account for 44% of the US work force, and for 64% of net new jobs since 1993-2008. We should focus on them, especially on reducing their taxes. I know of small companies who pay 50% of their gross revenue to the government... seriously, wtf? Furthermore, since Obama took over, he has made it more difficult for people to be private contractors. It's time to stop caring about big business and stimulate some competition for the fat losers.
Edit: Employees of small business are also 13 times as to produce patents, and 2 times as likely to have their patents be among the 1% most cited.
Large companies really are fat losers, and it's no secret that many of them are only fat because the government made them that way.
http://web.sba.gov/faqs/faqIndexAll.cfm?areaid=24
I want to point out that it's better to reduce taxes on the upper middle class and lower rich (the people who probably own small businesses), and not so much on the super rich. The super rich love high taxes on the "rich" because progressive taxes do not apply to them and it eliminates competition.
Woot!
Yeah, I work. Part time, but it pays the bills
.
New email sent. It better work this time. I'm off to work now, so I'll ttyl.
Well, I sent you my email last night. It was titled Zarf. Are you sure?
WFS,
Ok, how about this. I will be your attacker (I'm so-so) and you will be my banker?
Zarf,
Did you get my email?
> Wild Flower Soul wrote:
> If you already have a Quantam, you won't need me ![]()
I think it would be amusing if I were your banker. We would be the perfect match ![]()
For real?
My email... How about you give me your email and I will email it to you?
It has been years since I last played this game. But zomg, I can't miss this. I have experience as a cf banker, but I want to try being a partax opper. I will be a cf banker or opper depending on what is convenient for the family.
V.Kemp,
I don't value collectivism. I view selfishness as good and altruism as bad. My favorite quote is "no good deed goes unpunished." That said, you still haven't empirically demonstrated that your values are objectively true. Instead you have resorted to name-calling and appeals to a higher authority in the sky, which only illustrates that you have no argument. At least I am honest and say that my values are a useful fiction, but you like to say that yours are objectively true. When I call on you to empirically prove that, you resort to name calling and restate that your values come from above and are objective, which is plainly just circular reasoning.
Kemp,
Slavery may be unanimously undesirable, but that does not make it wrong. As a matter of fact, I oppose slavery because it is less efficient and conducive to technological progress than free labor. It is the arguments of yours that posit objective morality and rights that I am attacking as baseless. Empirically, the only rights you have are the ones written in the law books and that are enforced.
I did it.
Kemp,
I am not doubting that there is a correlation between freedom and economic prosperity. I am doubting that the rights are God given or that people are born to them. That is what you need to empirically justify. And the evidence suggests that rights are given or taken at the leisure of those with power. How else do you explain historical examples of slavery?
"God did it." Kemp, that is the last refuge of a man with no argument. Empirically demonstrate it, or you don't have anything.
Chicken,
Just so you know, a lot of the smaller companies are killed off because the government gave a company a competitive advantage in a so called "capitalist" country.
That is a small, unrepresentative sample clearly selected for entertainment. I hope you weren't being serious.
Most Americans do not know where Europe is on the map? WTF! I learned that in 1st grade. It's across the Atlantic, duh! I think you may be referring to the south. They are the laughing stock of our country. Bible belt, poor education, high church attendance etc. That said, the south isn't a bad place to be either. They just don't value education as much as the industrial and financial centers.
And culture... dude, a culture is a set of beliefs and rituals common to a population. Every group has a culture, and the US has cultural features common to all regions.
Edit: And the US should be considered a federation of people, even though the federal government has become MUCH more powerful and present in the past. While we have cultural features common to all regions, as I said earlier, it is less so in the US than other places. In different regions you will find different accents, different markets, and cultural practices. These differences can even be shocking. Some areas of the mid west may look more like Northern Europe, the Texans always have to wear their stupid cowboy hats as a status symbol, the coasts are centers of our financial empire, and the south is a mix of white/black cultures.
Btw, Napoleon was fighting a mostly defensive war the entire time. The nobility of Europe considered the ideals of the French Revolution, and Napoleon by extension, a threat to their assets and power. As for the British, they received a lot of pressure by the continental powers, and they saw an isolated France as an opportunity to harm a major competitor. Many of Napoleon's conquests were strategic necessities for France's own security, such as the Confederation of the Rhine, which served as a buffer. While we can't say he didn't desire to conquer Europe, he didn't maintain control of Austria or Prussia when he had the chance, and most of the wars and conquests he fought were in response to an invasion.
Hell, why do you think Metternich organized an agreement among the great powers to immediately crush any Republican revolution? The fact is the nobility did not want to lose their power, and Napoleon challenged them. Overall, he was an effective ruler. It is not fair to compare him to Genghis Khan, Hitler, or Stalin. He was nothing like those savages.
___
As for the Libertarians, I agree they are nutty. Most of them seem to just want drugs to be legalized, and have no intelligent thoughts to contribute to their movement. That said, I agree with Kemp in principle. I want less intervention than today, but on the other hand do not want 100% isolationism.
Come out Stefan! We know you're there!
Zarf,
Underlying racism? So underneath someone believes that humans are divided in to sub species, but they keep to themselves and try to find a different reason to justify their actions?
But then, liberals are still sensitive because, often times, they can't tell what the person's actual beliefs are. Maybe their belief is reasonable for certain kinds of discrimination, not because of race but because certain 'races' are prone to certain behaviors due to culture and economic circumstances. It isn't racist to reason the following:
Illegal aliens tend to be from Mexico
Latinos tend to be Mexicans
__
Illegal aliens tend to be Mexicans
But noooo... Liberals scream that that reasoning is racism, effectively providing an obstacle to an efficient solution for illegal immigration.
I think of racism as attributing a behavior or ability to a person or group to a biological attribute specific to a human subspecies. This means that for something to be racist, it must imply that humans can be subdivided in to sub species, and these sub species have unique behaviors and abilities (like intelligence).
Of course, liberals seem to have a broader definition of racism. They scream racism whenever illegal aliens are arrested, when arabs are suspected as terrorists, or when a hip hop black guy is walking through an upper middle class neighborhood etc. So, liberals, tell me how you are defining racism, and how it isn't just libel and defamation to halt a legitimate argument?
I lost my first game in SC II, because that mofo had an ungodly apm and micro ability.
Fine, I won't defend you next time.
Imperial Forum → Posts by Justinian I
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.