> lmperial wrote:
>Your(YOUR YOUR YOUR) talking off of theories, <
Facts, actually. But if you feel like being picky: Scientific theories (Which as we all know are different to plain ordinary theories.
> and as said you still don't have proof, nor did you address who came first in the primate family, Male or Female, <
You never said anything about the primate family, but again the answer is obvious: Neither, sexes existed for millions of years before the primate branch of the evolutionary tree. This is easily researchable.
> You have no proof if sexual or Asexual were first to exist, your assuming based off the fact you only need 1 to reproduce asexually that it is how it happened, no one knows how life came to be on Earth, we can speculate, but never answer, your answer in regards to that is a leading THEORY but it is a theory as it were. <
The oldest fossils in existence are of bacteria. Bacteria are sexless. Bacteria reproduce Asexually. This is easily researchable.
Now if you actually desire proof rather than an argument then go and do some simple research, you can go to the library, you can ask your doctor, and you can even use the internet. But as I said, tyhis depends on wether or not you actually want answers more than you want an argument.