[]
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
The forums have moved!
Click here to use the new forums. Enjoy!
Search options (Page 4 of 26)
Imperial Forum → Posts by .:]FfT[:. Dead Kennedys
Posts found: 76 to 100 of 641
77 21-May-2015 22:40:28
Re: Supernova Round 14 (17 replies, posted in Universal News)
[Next time just say you dislike Stefan. The swearing and off topic spam is not necessary.]
78 21-May-2015 22:40:12
Re: Suggestions for Starburst next round (66 replies, posted in Universal News)
[Next time just say you dislike Stefan. The swearing and off topic spam is not necessary.]
79 21-May-2015 22:39:39
Re: Starburst Round XIII (200 replies, posted in Universal News)
[Next time just say you dislike Stefan. The swearing and off topic spam is not necessary.]
80 13-May-2015 20:13:32
Re: Starburst Round XIII (200 replies, posted in Universal News)
i didnt accuse anyone at all...just saying the facts as they are. My main attacker got blocked, shortly thereafter i recieved a declaration from 88 and ops from 91
81 13-May-2015 18:56:02
Re: Starburst Round XIII (200 replies, posted in Universal News)
so it's 89 vs 91 and 88 (who seem to be working together per say, but I am not accusing anyone) yep a good old 2v1, not that I am whining it's just funny. A tick after our main attacker gets blocked 88 declares, same tick or maybe tick after 91 starts opping our poppers out of the blue. /me smells fish
82 12-May-2015 01:48:26
Re: Starburst Round XIII (200 replies, posted in Universal News)
i hate it when leaders think they are above their fam mates...if the fam wants a nap freaking do it, 92 just offered it for 50 planets...
83 10-May-2015 18:40:17
Re: Suggestions for Starburst next round (66 replies, posted in Universal News)
exceed wrote:
For real now:
larger map, more planets, more space for everyone
drafts get allowed whatever race they want
1 week of no attacks/opps/market
8 fams max, or less
more players in each fam
getting rid of inactives quicker should be something to look intoOne extra family member spot has been added to all families in Starburst due to the galaxy filling up.
Do not add a spot when most fams still need more players... wait untill its completly full, the ones who can't join can then inform a mod (give this as a msg when players try to join and can't because full) and then and only then you add new spots...
1. Map size was perfect in my eyes, made for good long expo phase followed by a good long war phase, nothing wrong with it at all and infact this felt like the most balanced round in a while
2. I like the idea of drafts being able to be any race.
3. attacks/ops already are 7 days and this was great
4. more players in each fam.......I COMPLETELY disagree, if you do this it ensures one fam with max players, say 10 or 9, run away with the round while other 7 man or less fams have no chance...I like exactly how it was this round and if anything, cut it down by 1-2 players so we have more fams...But PLEASE DO NOT make it more players per fam
5. Inactives...Leader should have some kind of function to boot them faster
84 10-May-2015 15:58:59
Re: Starburst Round XIII (200 replies, posted in Universal News)
He's leader of 88
85 09-May-2015 01:03:09
Re: Suggestions for Starburst next round (66 replies, posted in Universal News)
Let's get the discussion for next round rolling guys
86 08-May-2015 20:02:19
Re: Starburst Round XIII (200 replies, posted in Universal News)
Flash[light]ning wrote:
-----------------------------------------
- SUMMED UP REPORTS FROM YEARS: 18, 19. -
------------------------------------------------------------
- EXPLORATION -
-------------------
-------------------
0 planet(s) have been explored.----------------
- CAPTURES -
----------------
-------------------
0 planet(s) have been captured.---------------
- DEFEATS -
---------------
175 planet(s) lost by Mockingjay.
4 planet(s) lost by The Black Company.
2 planet(s) lost by EOD.
-------------------
181 planet(s) have been lost.----------------------
- FAILED ATTACKS -
----------------------
-------------------
0 attack(s) without capture.--------------------------
- SUCCESSFUL DEFENSE -
--------------------------
45 attack(s) without capture against EOD.
9 attack(s) without capture against Mockingjay.
-------------------
54 enemy attacks failed.--------------------
- INTRA FAMILY -
--------------------
-------------------
0 planet(s) have been swapped among family members.---------------------
- AID SHIPMENTS -
---------------------Don't usually come to whine. But i just came back from quite a long break and i will be taking an indefinite one after this. I am mockingjay in 1394 and we were only 1-2mill in range of 1389. Now this is beyond farming. Its hilarious how much they will stoop to for a few planets. As you can tell we foolishly fought back a bit at the beginning and now they rape and rape till nothing. our fam consisted of 2 big SSer's happily just building and minding our own business.
Week 32, 18 Save - Reply
nah you're wrong about that, there are still teams that play ftw, and not a selfsuficient adventure like in your fam. In a team everybody has a role, and my role is to gather planets for the fam. The round goal is settled the way size wins, and thats a real problem when you are allowed to attack small fams and abuse a game flaw. I am not proud of it, but I know 100% sure that the #darkside# fam would do it too, and honestly, better planned, and more deadly for you.
For future references use diplomacy before explo-phase is over, we'd nap your fam for a few planets and you wouldnt have to lose all this infra.
Signed, Gueorgui Konstantino of GEN Zhukov (#1389)
Week 31, 18 Save - Reply
I have been attacking your fam for days now, what else you want? a spot in my back announcing it??
I'm an attacker doing my job, and tbh attacking a fam of your size shouldnt be allowed by the game, dont blame me, blame the game, it is shit.
Signed, Gueorgui Konstantino of GEN Zhukov (#1389)These are also hilarious.
"don't blame me, blame the game" LOL. just because you CAN do it. doesn't mean you SHOULD. For someone who always played with morals trying to make it fun for all this is a shame. All i can hope is stefan hurrys up and pulls the plug now. maybe leaving the forums in tact.
Sorry Flashy, had I known it was you I would have told Render to stop ages ago...er maybe not...I dunno...but it does stand to reason that something needs to be done before the game gets farmed to nothing.
87 03-May-2015 18:39:33
Re: Starburst Round XIII (200 replies, posted in Universal News)
Allies would be cool but only if mods can get it working, I would hate to see a bug where one fam can have multiple allies or something along those lines. Something does need to be done about farming though, and I think KT's new announcement about 40% nw rule being 24 hours instead of 72 will help, but it is not enough. The mods could assess the situation when one fam is claiming to be farmed and maybe if the guilty party was infact guilty of farming, they could put a tag in their forum name declaring them farmers for the rest of the round, or better yet, decrease the morale losses for every single family in the galaxy, leaving the farmers with normal morale. That would ensure no one gets farmed to deletion and also it could add a new dynamic to the game, like if 2 families decided to farm then the rest of the gal has better morale than both those fams...I dunno just a thought, I'm stoned 
88 14-Apr-2015 17:23:04
Re: 40% NW rule (13 replies, posted in Bugs)
So in other words the bottom fam must have done an op or attack to ensure 92 can continue to raid them...Not too bright lol
89 10-Apr-2015 23:54:55
Re: Starburst Round XIII (200 replies, posted in Universal News)
I told you that you would recieve your answer within 24 hours. The decision was made a few ticks later, I tried to message you, told you to come to chat. You did not, so I gave my answer in ops. Offer still stands to end the fighting.
90 10-Apr-2015 18:42:18
Re: Starburst Round XIII (200 replies, posted in Universal News)
now now Zanharim. You declared first so that gave us every right to op/attack you. Were we supposed to just let you guys clear everything? If you want, come to my chat and we can try to talk about stopping the fight.
91 09-Apr-2015 03:20:32
Re: Starburst Round XIII (200 replies, posted in Universal News)
Oh I dunno *Looks Innocent*
92 08-Apr-2015 23:29:53
Re: Starburst Round XIII (200 replies, posted in Universal News)
90 declared on 89 
93 27-Mar-2015 05:19:20
Re: Starburst Round XIII (200 replies, posted in Universal News)
you missed the previous 776 BUD's
94 23-Mar-2015 16:28:43
Re: Starburst Round XIII (200 replies, posted in Universal News)
So in other words they have no way of catching them until they are deep into the game and hurting others. As BUD777 said, you can make a script and add in the extra variables your talking about KT. It is in fact a basic task...
98 15-Mar-2015 03:11:50
Re: It's a BOY!! (7 replies, posted in Community)
Hey congrats Rev, may he bring nothing but joy to you and yours...Until teenage years at least haha
99 15-Mar-2015 03:10:22
Re: Suggestions for Starburst next round (66 replies, posted in Universal News)
thanks KT for taking interest in the thread.
Families 9
Players 8
Attacks/opps 4 days
Bigger map 160*160
Systems around 700-750
Slightly longer round
I like this, only thing i would edit is 1 week attacks/ops so folks can get expoed and war instead of just all pnap, also id take pnap out
Posts found: 76 to 100 of 641
Imperial Forum → Posts by .:]FfT[:. Dead Kennedys
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.