try clicking in one of the boxes for family number or x y coordinates. Sounds like you highlighted your sidebar. Not that that should slow things down any...

> Noir wrote:

> If a research planet has say +50, that means that there are 50 "hidden" RCs on the planet, so the planet will produce research points.

The planet will however not boost any income from additional RCs you build on the planet

Is it 50*20*1.Science Bonus? Or not including Race bonus?

lol you'll love this:

01[09:32] Gondor: What was the point of having researchers also?
01[09:32] Gondor: We abandoned that like 4 days in...
01[09:32] Gondor: could have been jumping banker planets
06[09:33] * Gondor curls in a ball in frustation *
01[09:33] Gondor: I should have made RCs last friday
01[09:33] Gondor: [] X(
01[09:33] Gondor: lol
[09:33] JefF:
[09:33] JefF: ice doesn't know i have RCs

Yeah, no one was listening to you...

I'm pretty sure that's his quotes primary target Waffles....

What about setting up a system based on the score accumulated by an empire for the round?

It would reward people for not deleting and the higher ranked the family the more points they would get (higher family rank = higher individual score accumulated by players in the family).

Does anyone know the maximum amount of score that can be accumulated by an empire in a round? You'd just have to come up with scale on based on how much score the empire has to how many tag points would be added.

Whatever you're doing try to have fun. Revalon, Partaxian or a Custom race with a positive income bonus are what you should choose if your new and want to bank.

Depending on what family you land in will determine how your round goes no matter what race you choose. You may not get attack all round or you may be attacked the entire round. Just how it goes sometimes.

If you're active then you'll probably have a better round because activity breeds activity (imo) so the more active you are the more active you can get your family members to be.

I agree with Damon for the TO percent. Somewhere in the 25-40% range works best (technically it's 25% exact to get maximum income)

And remember, even though your planets have a "max size" it doesn't mean you can only make just that many buildings on it. It's called overbuilding. and it's a good thing

Welcome to the game

I don't care if i don't have an option on how to sort it, just some kind of sort beyond the current. For example:

I'm currently hovering over these planets and they are all in the same system and all sent on the same tick and arrived the same tick. It took me like 10 mins to go through and make sure i had sent to all the correct planets on a list i was supposed to because the planet coords on the fleet page aren't in any kind of order aside from the tick they arrive or hovering

xx,yy:13
xx,yy:8
xx,yy:20
xx,yy:14
xx,yy:17
xx,yy:6
xx,yy:5
xx,yy:9
xx,yy:11
xx,yy:12
xx,yy:22

27-Sep-2008 07:05:23

Joor
    Solar Defender

Re: Building in percentage

Nohh, I want a tagpoint for this ^^
I am driving on insanity.

Offline

    * Report |
    * Quote

#13 27-Sep-2008 07:08:14

Skyroshroud
    Galactic Warrior

Re: Building in percentage

you just got one wink

lol

Last edited by Skyroshroud (27-Sep-2008 07:08:36)

SG-1 had run it's course really. They could have ended it a couple of years earlier even. I loved Ben Browder in FarScape but he's no RDK.

SGA was cancelled because of declining viewers (apparently) and the audiences for SG-1 and SGA weren't in the right demographic of viewers that they wanted (apparently too old) so they were hoping SGU would appeal to a younger group of viewers (Just what young people want... painfully slow plot development and no tits or ass )

If they had shown that James girl in her underwear more often who knows how long the show would have gone! Or at least some clevage shots of them....

http://www.thesuperdooperness.com/wp-content/gallery/julia-benson/julia-benson-sgu.jpg

That times the entire run time = excellent episode

*rabble rabble rabble*