> it because it does no good for 1000 people to comment
nothing gets solved and things get perpetuated. I prefer not to have big discussions over boards because
no one leaves satisfied. Therefore I perfer a more personal approach <

Have you ever considered ignoring anyone who you are not talking to? People like Deci only bother those they know will react.
As for satisfaction; Why is this important? Do you need win?

"If things can be of God but separate of God [...]"

If...?

> Chris_Balsz wrote:

> Pseudoscience, like economics.  They measure the CO2 in the atmosphere and then say "oh when CO2 is present at so many ppm then we know there tend to be such and such an effect"  But CO2 is not equally distributed around the world, there are bands of CO2 density. <

And you think nobody but you knew this because...

> Yet the EFFECTS of CO2 are held to be global. <

Yep. You know why? Of course you don't, that's why you're waving this around like it's some kind of doomday device when all you actually have is a service-station spoon.

> This is the clearest sign that "Global warming" fails to explain a physical process.  It attempts to equate statistical anamolies by hypothesizing such a process might be ongoing but fails to propose ANY clear empirical test of the process. <

How brave you are, attacking climate change now that you can be certain that the emirical testing is years away once again.

> Lower temperatures? Well that doesn't signify, because we know global warming is real. <

Actually it does "signify". Ever heard of the gulf-stream? The "winter" we just had here in the UK is related. Not that you'll think about this...

> Ice buildup on the poles?  Doesn't signify. <

Each year the Arctic ice receeds further than ever before, anyone who watches the news can tell you this.

> The problem with science by statistical anamoly is that if you developed broader and more complete data sets, your anomaly might vanish. <

The only truth you have written here...
__________

> thisyearsmostopen wrote:
> fact is - is global warming/climate change however you wanna call it is natural ! <

Thankyou for partially accepting our acceptance that Global Warming was a misnomer and the resulting shift thereafter.

> these scientists crying about warming are the same ones that where 99.9% certain that we where entering another ice age in the 1970's.... <

I still can't understand how they could have thought that with such low levels of supporting evidence, and such limited evidence gathering ability.

> having studied environmental science to university level i know for a fact you can prove whatever you like through science wherever your agender [...] <

You seriously expect me to believe you have been to University when you cannot even spell properly, let alone punctuate? <

> is - oil company sponsored scientists prove its natural - government sponsored scientists prove its people - because its the governments agender to do this - both to collect tax through the guilt related 'green taxes' and like obama said his 'green industry' will get use threw this recession.....  yeah right..... <

So your only real problem with Climate Change is that you shitty excuse for a government (they're both the same dimwits!) is using it as yet another excuse tou gouge your bank accounts? Sad...
__________

how do you do the colours, anyway?

> Salamandastron wrote:

> I just felt it was my duty as an American to say a random quote that only makes sense to fellow Americans, though it's true meaning is completely useless. It seems to work pretty well, until the Bush Administration :\ <

Sorry; misquote. I meant to quote Aro...

http://www.dudestuff.net/BoobCollage.jpg

> Salamandastron wrote:
> Oh gawd, the British are coming! <

Like? (

> [RPA] Lloyd List wrote:
> [...] I for one find gore-bands could do with some more original lyrics and themes, and I'm a born sadist for god's sake. <

Gore? Like "Mortician"?

> Where the hell do you live? <

Nottinghamshire.

"People in poor neighborhoods didn't build AK 47's out of table spoons and house hold products. Yes, anybody can get their hands on one, but where does it come from?"

Around here, Crazy Ivan. I shit you not.

"How do high school teenagers in colorado get their hands on C4's?"

Our local paper said something similar to that in the 80's when the local Bobby caught some kids playing with hand grenades and semtex. And then again in the 90's when they were playing with knives. And again now now that they are playing with guns.

How many supplies do you have in your house to mix together anthrax?

I had a go at making my own leather once (I seriously have that much spare time) so: All of them.

"How do you even know how to put an AK 47 together let alone to use it if they aren't teaching it in school? I mean, rather than open your eyes, you choose to blame the original victims."

It's not hard, all an AK has is a trigger, a spring, a firing pin, and a piece of string. Oh, and some bullets obviously.

"Things are different now of course, people are more educated on things and have the choices to make. But yes, the government did poor crack cocaine into the poor black communities."

You mean like when the British Government tried to do away with the miners and their families by filling the council estates with smack?

"It's a great form of oppression. This is something that has happened all throughout history with different countries and cultures. There have even been former CIA agents who have confessed to knowing about this. I mean....does nobody else bother to read? =/"

We have the National Enquirer too.

Hmm... It seems that if I had been born in the US of A I would have been black. Imagine how far I would have gotten with all of that special help available just for me!