>>JFK tower is an extremely well-run facility, and only the best work there. His father told him exactly what to say, when to say it, and it was a controlled situation. <<
No it was not. The tower crew had no control over what the kid was saying. The dad had no control over who heard it. Directing the operation of a vehicle over the radio is not a controlled situation. It is nearly the opposite of controlled.
>>So no, the child was NOT controlling aircraft, the dad was. None of the pilots raised any objections, and this occurred during a "slow" period of air traffic. This would never happen during a high saturation period, and if it did /then/ I would be concerned. As it happens, the transmissions were entirely within context and anticipated by the flight crews, nothing more than takeoff clearances and departure handoffs. The news made much ado about nothing.<<
Actually he did botch a call and had to repeat it. That this went smoothly is luck. And luck is not supposed to be a factor.
>>There's very few among us in the commercial aviation fraternity who would barbeque this controller for taking his kid into the cab and letting him issue a few casual instructions. The only people who are truly outraged are those who have accumulated a total of ZERO hours in a cockpit, much less spent any time in a tower cab anywhere.<<
Serenity didn't like it so that's just one among the few here, and I've seen others argue it too. And finally, the FAA makes the rules, not the guys who take money to do it.