Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Posts by Cjay92
Why does it cost more to take a bid (resource) off the market, compared to placing the bid (resource) on the market?
It's 4x's the cost
Also why the double billing.
I got given the role as leader. I never asked for it, I never wanted it nor do I have the time for it. If you want to negotiate pnaps and crap like that, don't go arranging it behind our backs
As vice leader at the time, I have the right to set up cease fire, and to talk about naps. I sent you all communications between me and SWAGGA, I sent you list of planets being give for comp
Yet u didn't do any of that, you sent no messages to me about breaking cease fire, you chose to go behind my back and break the cease fire just because you have a problem with SWAGGA
You don't want to be leader no problem, take your vote and change it from yourself
And your only leader because u have 2 votes now. As u can see I didn't vote for u.
Your mouth is made for toolbags-
Is that all you've got to say?
Everyone saw our line-up at sor. Everyone knows not many peeps really like to stay in small fams.
Luster only plays if he's in a top fam.
Cloud just gets frustrated with the game.You're just mad because I surprised the poo out of you, and almost owned you so close to sor.
And then they started taking planets back and u folded so fast. Wanting a nap and cease fire
, just so they wouldn't have owned you.
The only reason why your above them now is because the guy attacking (me, the guy who does not like attacker role) quit the game because the leader (Rawrr) decide he could try and tarnish my word by not excepting the cease fire, and pnap (with planet compensation from you) I had excepted being vice leader, with no notice to anyone. I gave my word on the cease fire, my word is my bond. It's the only one true thing a person has in life.
Money, home, security all can be taken away by others, your word is the only thing that u as a person have total control over. To either live by, or not.
Games down to 45 players and ppl still think that playing a dishonourable game is the way to play.
Are you sure? It could be blowing down!
This guy may be a good/great actor, but he is such a moron.
Chinooks are a normal weather occurrence here in Southern Alberta, as long as I have lived in this province they have happened!
I have been here for over thirty years, and they have always happened!
How about having it that the attacked player has the same moral loss as the attacking player
So if a smaller player has a moral loss of say 12% and takes 7-8 planets off a larger player, the larger player has the same moral loss of 12% for each retake he dose. Rather than the 100% that it is now, leaving him open to attacks from anyone who wishes to attack him
The moral system as it is sux's.
Plan and simple
It's gone from one extreme to the other
From larger family farming smaller ones to smaller ones farming larger ones
The moral loss is stupid.
Smaller families able to attack 7-1 is stupid
Be nice if we had some input from an mod on this, but then again that would probly be asking too much.
Topic: Supernova Round 19057
Map size: 80x80 (last round 80x80)
Systems: 658 (last round 641)
Families: 75 (last round 75)
Family size: 1
Max allies: 0
Length: 2 months
Attacks and ops: 4 day delay
Market: 4 day delay
Resources: 50x
Exploration ships: 30
Defense Stations: 1
Cores: 3 (including home system) but you must fight for the other 2
Starting: Saturday, Jan 9
Ending: Wednesday, Mar 9
This is NOT an IA round for Supernova
whats up with the gal sizes ???
9-10-11-12-13 planets per system???
Yes I agree, this was not a good implement for the game.
It still gives the larger families an advantage over the smaller ones, the idea I believe for the moral cost was to stop the farming of smaller family/player, while all u have done was make it an eco game.
Larger families will now attack smaller ones, knowing that now they have an advantage over them. They will send in there smaller attackers to take what they want, while penalized the smaller one for trying to take back what was lost, trying to retake a planet.
Let the Eco game begin!
Really 1818 blue pill
U seem to be having a hard time taking over the rogue planets. U need help.
I can't do much more, after all they are wide open
Oh. Am I allowed to post this here
Really 1818 blue pill
U seem to be having a hard time taking over the rogue planets. U need help.
I can't do much more, after all they are wide open
Oh. Am I allowed to post this here
Who are we double teaming?
With 19/23 combined NW of over 20 mill attacking a family of just over 6mill
Yea. That would be double teaming
Starburst: Mace Windu (#1819) took 2 planets off TD (#1822).
Starburst: Bearded Dragon (#1823) took a planet off Waldo the Weird (#1822).
Starburst: Sol Invictus (#1819) took 3 planets off Gieluh (#1822).
Starburst: Obiwan will own me (#1819) took a planet off Gieluh (#1822).
Starburst: Obiwan will own me (#1819) took 10 planets off Gaap (#1822).
Starburst: Obiwan will own me (#1819) took a planet off Waldo the Weird (#1822).
Starburst: Pink Elephant (#1823) took 7 planets off Waldo the Weird (#1822).
Starburst: conspiracy theory (#1819) took 6 planets off Gieluh (#1822).
So nice to see that vets are kill off the new ppl to the game, NOT
WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO WAKE UP AND REALIZE HOW MUCH YOU ARE CONTINUALLY HURTING THE GAME BY PLAYING THIS WAY.
Since this game has started I have had 25 ppl try this game, guess what, not one of them still plays.
They may have tried a round or two, but all have quit because of the same s hit ever round.
Incoming news
http://www.fxstreet.com/news/forex-news … f2625fb7d5
Leaders, post your teams here.
After all u have 3-4 weeks to get it done, specially if there waiting on SN to end. Then fix what code that needs it. So us a good month should be right
After all it's what 20 days before SN is over. Then what a week for things to be fixed.
Such poor planning
Just about 2 months and still nothing what a joke
This is the second posting about this galaxy start up, and u still haven't gotten ur shit together yet
With only 60 players who sign up for this game normally, by now u think u would have done something about it, or with such a small turn out, is it even worth the time and effort
Nobody has any comment on arby3's ex? Really?
Which part
That Arby's had a girlfriend, or that she/he looked like Artic
To be fair for all a reset should have automatically apply.
This post is nothing but a waste of time, if some of the players have gain infra,resources etc, and some have lost, it would only be in the best interest of those who gained to vote for nothing, as well as the rest of their family to vote the same way.
While the few that have lost are still losing, in the long run
It should have been an automatic reset, with an explanation as to why the reset!
We have all seen the reason, so just reset
The game should be fair for all, with no extra gains because of the something that went wrong with the game to those who gained infra,ressie etc
Any win from this point on would not really be a true win for you, with only 70 players (if all are active) in the game do you really need to win this way.
So some might get into a better family, And some might not with a reset, but atleast the game would be fair to all !
Once again you ppl, keep missing the point. Once again most of u seem to rallie around those that do dishonourable acts, boost up their ego, slap them on the back and say " job well done"
Once again we have new/old players leaving the game because of these types of gamers, and you continue to think all is fine with it. You think because it's only a game that all dishonourable acts are perfectly all right when it suits you, and not how it hurts the game.
You seem to think well the game has nothing to do with RL, but in truth it does! It shows the type of person you really are, if your willing to lie, cheat or steal from your Allie, what does it really say about you as a person, and what kind of friend you would be. Not one I would have, or want.
Ppl play games to escape reality, to get away from the crap that is happening around them, and emerce them selfs into a world that should be black and white, not the fifty different shades of grey it turns out to be.
When you allie with a family and stay allied with them all round, it says your trust worthy, you've got our back. Hell you were even let to expo through out our core on this alliance
But to turn around just as the game comes to an end and backstab those that excepted this trust, is dishonourable
When are you going to learn that this type of gaming should not be acceptable, when are you going to understand that it was this type of action, and other dishonourable acts that has killed this game off and will continue too! It always seem ppl will always blame someone else for there acts, or use some other reason, rather than own up to the dishonourable acts they commit within the game.
Why is that?
why do you feel you always have to blame the other guy/gal, rather than take the responsibility of your action. Do you think if you do we will think any less of you. You already did the act, we already think your a dick, but you know, most ppl would take another look at you as a person by excepting the blame for your action.
As for this posting, and if we use Undead reasoning
I somewhat doubt there's any truth to the cheating mod theories, as it takes all the pleasure out of winning if you cheat, and it's generally very bad for the game so surely the people who give up their time to mod this game would care a lot about that.
We all know of mods in the past that have done wrong within the game,etc...
So they are all guilty by default, guilty by association!
And as for my post about the fact that Undead is an mod and have his mod status removed for his action. Mods should be held accountable for their dishonourable actions within the game even more than any other player, for they are the ones ppl are suppose to turn to when acts such as this one or other dishonourable acts are done. NOT LEAD THE PACK!
As for this posting
Starburst Round 16 report - Fam '98
Well done, you played the game very well, and to the point
haha no, technically they could have IA'd with anyone they wanted to, then attack you whenever they wanted to, or conversely, plan to attack you whenever it was of benefit to them, you see there are no rules against it in a Chaos round lol
You got schooled!
Just remember that.
In case you didn't know DW means
Diamond Wad. Which seems to be the best part left inside your old mans diamond!
you can say what u want!
When you chose an Allie, and turn on him its dishonourable
I'll just put you down in the same category as Undead
Just pray they don't make a chaos round next round and I land in your family
After all chaos goes for all
it was not part of the main post, why did it take him an hr to decide for a chaos round, but still all in all you are a dishonourable player and will always be one.
Your excuse is still lame, and if I remember correctly you had our enemie in most of the systems that our small attacker expoed into. And u let them expo their knowing that we would send an attacker into those systems to clear him, or to set up position to clear close smaller attacker they had close by.
YouR lame excuse of what Colorado would have done is pointless,
After all, would we not have cleared your attacker from our core first, and with the amount of agents/wizards you had you would have seen that, but no you had to be the DW, AND ATTACK AN ALLIE.
And being a mod, your actions are/where dishonourable, And reprehensibleble, and show a complete lack of respect for the game, and it's players, and should have your mod tag removed on grounds of trying to ruin the game, rather than trying to promote it.
It's your action that have cause ppl to leave the game, just another want to be
Grow up, and except the fact of what you have done!
And in cas you are not sure what reprehensible means
rep·re·hen·si·ble
ˌreprəˈhensəb(ə)l/
adjective
deserving censure or condemnation.
"his complacency and reprehensible laxity"
synonyms: deplorable, disgraceful, discreditable, despicable, blameworthy, culpable, wrong, bad, shameful, dishonorable, objectionable, opprobrious, repugnant, inexcusable, unforgivable, indefensible, unjustifiable; More
Rev wrote:and 96 are nothing but whiners and sore losers by the looks of this thread (not in 01, but still..... i can sit here smiling haha)
They seem to be forgetting that this wasn't a "Let's circle up and give each other a hand" round, it was a "Chaos" round
Why do u keep calling it a chaos round when it wasn't
Size: 100x100 (last round 160x160)
Systems: 699 (697 last round)
Families: 8 (8)
Family size: is now 11 started with 7 (8)
Drafts: 1.
Max allies: 0 (same)
Length: 4 weeks (4 weeks)
Market: 2 days
Offensive Operations: 2 days (was 7 days)
Resources: 10x
Defense Stations: 3
Start: 2015-07-28 17:00:00
Ending: 2015-08-27 17:00:00
Morale Overhaul
Ladies and gentlemen, prepare for one of the biggest changes since fleet readiness was introduced (since renamed morale). We listened to what we were told, the morale formula hasn't been working and the small player hasn't been adequately protected. As a result we've entirely scrapped the morale formula and started from scratch.
No longer will there be any 40% rule or any sort of family protecting. Instead the new enhanced morale formula is designed to make these attacks possible but extremely costly on morale. Not only will size influence morale loss, but relative family and player networth will be taken into account.
Due to the removal of the family protection rules the sentinel tag will no longer be required. The new morale formula is designed to allow for these attacks to protect your core, but at the same time you will rapidly run out of morale.
Special Operations Overhaul
Simultaneously we will be implementing a new mechanic for Special Operations. We're removing the ops limit. Instead, special operations will cost morale, similar to attacks.
The formula used will be similar to the new morale formula, and obviously as this is a brand new concept will be subject to changes as needed.
Summary
The old morale rules will no longer apply.
The old family protection rules will no longer apply.
The sentinel tag has been removed.
The new morale formula allows attacks on anyone as long as the attack will not result in a negative morale.
The new morale formula takes relative family nw and player nw into account.
Special Operations will now require morale instead of the arbitrary limit of 1 op regenerated per tick.
Warcry is temporarily disabled.
The new morale formula may be further altered after the round, depending on feedback. Thanks for your patience and good luck everyone.
We have made this 4 weeks but if things look good we will lengthen it. This will be a testing round.
~~Lemming of leather and lollipops~~
Right, so what are we waiting for? Can we get this going? Any other feedback?
Shame it ended like this. Colorado would have attacked us sooner or later so we took to call to get the first hit. Lesson to be learned Colorado, what comes around goes around. Last round I got raped like this, this round colo got raped. What hurts me is that good people like orbit had to take the hit for it.
No shame on u and your family for this dishonest act. shame on u when u decide to ruin other peoples round for your petty act of vengeance against a single player. Shame one u
You hit our other allies in order to try to overtake us for 1st place... Not sure what made you guys think that was ok and/or honorable
That being said, I don't believe for a second that you guys wouldn't of hit us by EOR if we didn't pull the trigger first. We've been watching you guys plug your small Camaar in all over our banker systems for the past 2 weeks. I'm sure that wasn't intended as an aggressive move though.
They were your allies, not ours. What that means is that u take the high ground and stay out of any fighting between allies.When u have allied a family all round, and set up in their core from the beginning of the game, knowing full well what u had planned for the end of the round, is completely dishonourable
As for the second part of your comment, do u really think I would have sat by and let colo do that without doing/saying something about it. I've completely trashed my empire in the past/or refused aid because of acts such as this. I would have called to take away his leadership and placed him rouge
A lot of ppl in this game need to know what the word honour really means, rather than what their own concept of it.
fulfill (an obligation) or keep (an agreement).
"make sure the franchisees honor the terms of the contract"
synonyms: fulfill, observe, keep, obey, heed, follow, carry out, discharge, implement, execute with honour
Or how about being honourable
1.
bringing or worthy of honor.
"this is the only honorable course"
synonyms: honest, moral, ethical, principled, righteous, right-minded
At one time this game have 100's of ppl playing it, now it 50 on a good round, but really more like 40.
Imperial Forum → Posts by Cjay92
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.