ye mean t' say u think i were bein' tryin' me hardest t' win when i randomed as a banker this round? yup, sounds about right ![]()
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Posts by Archangel
ye mean t' say u think i were bein' tryin' me hardest t' win when i randomed as a banker this round? yup, sounds about right ![]()
jarik is right though, big gals like cap atm give smaller fams a much more interestin' round. i just randomed into a medium sized fam t' bank this round, an' we've had a perfectly interestin' round which we couldnt have had if th' gal had been small like ye want.
what dictates how fun th' round is fer th' top 10 fams, an' how much warrin'/infrawh0rin' thar is, isnt th' size o' th' gal, its th' calibre o' th' players. just a few rounds ago in andro we had a ridiculously large gal as well, but thar were bein' plenty o' warrin' betwixt th' top 10 fams, an' th' large gal just facilitated a different kind o' warrin', which were bein' interestin'. th' fact that we didnt have that this round isnt becos o' th' gal size, its becos o' th' players in th' top 10 ![]()
it may surprise you all to know that surrey county council are poor ![]()
PP needed to practice it gondor ![]()
you're all idiots. the score works exactly the way its supposed to. its not supposed to show you who's winning right now. thats what networth is for. what would the point be in having two ranks that did the same thing. the scores show how dominant fams have been throughout the round, or how much they just took advantage of an opportunity to get ahead. whether you like it or not makes no difference as to whether it does what its meant to do
its where u can go directly to the planet u want to attack without going through the map.
i dunno about other ppl but iv always found the attack button really useful for my phone when i dont want to or cant open up the entire map page lol. i can go to the attack page and back track to that specific system to send out expos even.
also i think the words need to be bigger
other than that i quite like it ![]()
ye i believe they would be
removed my post becos there's nothing they could have done
andro doesnt exist anymore ?
i would hardly call going to kent a 'holiday' lol
as for cf banking, my advice is to start pure cfs, going to 50% that way, then ob 50-100% with rcs until you have 4-6k rcs (depending on how big you expect to be over the course of the round). after that build TOs on new planets and keep going with cfs above 100/150% ob. dont demolish those 4-6k rcs, they wont affect your ratios much but they will help to keep ur con and eco researches up if you're not funding becos of war or sumthing. after that stick with 75/25 of cf/to
cougar i dont wanna start a big flaming contest, but i dont think i have ever heard a more stupid way of pop banking?
wot makes a pop banker big is his pop, not his planets. most pop bankers dont get as many planets as cf bankers anyway, they also dont get ob as high, and yet they still have 3 or more time a cf banker's nw.
and obing only LQs? are you mad? LQs cost 10 more iron each than TOs. LQs should almost always come first and then ob TOs for the higher percentages.
ed (my brother) picked up his gcse results today
6 A*s, 3As and a B ![]()
dude there are hundreds of them, and i certainly wouldnt expect skoe to be on that list...
jets just doesnt know how to use punctuation ![]()
cya arsy, you always put in alot more effort than seemed right considering your work position in real life. sad to see you go ![]()
as in the university of warwick which is in coventry not warwick
i did tell both u and sd that i was at warwick lat
u even gave me ur lab no though i cant remember it and forgot to write it down b4 old forum died
im studying classics.
also one of haribo's tribe is at warwick, studying economics i think
i got me a driving lesson in 10mins ![]()
fo the first half of the round we werent inactive lethal, i didnt have a summer job yet and i wasnt learning to drive yet either, both of which take up quite a bit of time.
and when i say that 910/897 didnt do much, i mean they didnt do much to make us drop so much, beyond show no restraint in stopping themselves after taking a considerable no. of planets from an inactive fam. if we had stayed active there was no reason why we would have dropped anywhere near that much because we were far from crippled by your early attacks.
oh and i didnt wanna bring you into this lethal becos you were one of the only people from that alliance who voted sensibly
and actually i have to say grow up to some of you others as well, like dimpel. the purpose of this voting is to give a succinct and fair overview of the round. it is not a place to slag off other fams or players. the three of you, and to a certain extent others, are turning this into a total farce.
grow up and act like you've got a pair, the lot of you
27. Worst mistake of round:912 thinking they can take us and finding they cant for the 2nd round.
i have to say that is sum cocky crap. neither 897 nor 910 did all that much to us. in case you didnt notice, we were inactive, busy, not caring. we didnt hadnt expoed in 2 weeks despite sitting on 400+ expos.
and orbit/kagar, grow up. voting me worst mistake of the round doesnt even make sense.
i hate to burst your bubbles but last time i checked 50*12 = 600 not 1200?
Imperial Forum → Posts by Archangel
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.