576

(220 replies, posted in Politics)

> Chris_Balsz wrote:

> Black people do not ever CHOOSE to interact with anybody as blacks... big difference <

Oh, but I must have sat down one day and thought, "You know what, I want to live the rest of my life in a state of continual sexuality flux"? The sad bastards that commit suicide rather than deal with their sexuality chose that?
That's bollocks, AND insulting, and you know it.


> What is the genetic difference between a gay man living a lie with a wife and kids, and a bisexual?
Nothing. <

Actually the difference is in the brain. Look it up. Or would that involve you admitting that you as a 40+ year old virgin might not have an idea as to what you're talking about?


> What is the behavioral difference between a gay man living a lie with a wife and kids, and a bisexual?
Nothing. <

In my experience, one is willing to have unprotected sex in bushes with complete strangers, the other needs to have not gotten laid for several months and have several glasses of pink gin before they reach that level of desperate stupidity.


> One guy just feels guilty about his lifestyle choices. <

I can spot a lavender marriage a mile away. So can most women. The only souce of guilt is the lies, not the sexuality.


> And there's religious grounds to oppose sinful lifestyles.  You may say "Well but society must not tolerate religious opposition to lifestyles" but that's RELIGIOUS BIGOTRY. <

There's also religious grounds to oppose eating fish on a monday.


> And finally, not really argumentative but I love it, the gays are finding out who donated to the Prop 8 campaign and trying to get them fired. <

Then those gays should be ashamed of themselves, stooping to such low levels.


> Except blacks. <

That's not the fault of gays, but of American society.


> They're picketing churches and church schools like the Mormons who sponsored Prop 8.

Except black Protestant and Catholic churches

And when they are asked by local radio "How come you're not protesting in front of black churches who marched against gay marriage" the picketers say "er uh we won't get into where we march and where we don't"

we all know why... racial discrimination!!! big_smile <

Well well well, you DO understand IRONY. Very good!

577

(54 replies, posted in Politics)

Why would Russia nuke NATO? We are both old enough to know how Russia works: They push, they test, but they never start; they end.
Just - like - America.

And that's the problem for you isn't it? You know how to deal with every mindset in the world, apart from your own.

578

(68 replies, posted in Politics)

> This is about how respect is demanded these days rather than earned.. <

  These days? How many times have you heard the phrase "Respect your elders"? People have been demanding respect rather than trying to earn it for centuries. We've even had wars over it, wars that make both World War's look like nasty disagreements with lots of pushing and shoving.
I was recently (within the last year) asked "Why don't you respect me?" by my girlfriend's 55 year old father. Rather than go with the usual Dr Cox style rant (but with more pent up rage) I simply stated "You haven't earned it".
The look upon his face was one of utter incomprehension. Then anger. Then he hit me.
"How about now? Have I earned it now?"
Then I hit him.
On that day I earned his son's respect, and my girlfriend realised she had spent her life being afraid of a bullying coward.

And then there's the "Niggaz", middle class white boys and upper class indian boys who are too stupid to realise that the latest dyslexically named superstar from "Duh ghetto" is actually an expesively educated son of a lawyer from Beverly Hills and is about as "Gangstuh" as Michael Jackson was in "Bad". These idots crave respect, yet have no understanding of the concept, have no idea of what it takes to be a real man.
In some cases they don't even have the smarts to realise they're being insulted.
"You've had a hard life, haven't you?"
"Yeah, cos Ima man!"

579

(54 replies, posted in Politics)

> avogadro wrote:
> "As long as you ignore little details like the maximum ranges of the missiles from BOTH sides."
yeah because Iran's missle technology will never improve.... <

  Which is only relevant in this discussion if America stops improving weapons technology for the next... what, decade? And even then, only if someone outside of the USA figures out the secret behind how fantastically accurate American missiles are. And even then only if the present situation continues for that length of time. And even then only if the USA is stupid enough to allow itself to fall behind a third world country.
  And now for the questionf that's actually relevant...


> "As for Iran's version of the ICBM; American missile sheild uses wrong kind of missiles to stop them... actually now that I think of it I'm sure an ICBM would just "hop" over the Sheild's sphere of influence."
what are you basing this off of? <

Facts. Data. Schematics. You know, actual research. I have posted all of it before, ask our resident Republicans, they all left the thread after I did that, so they may remember.

_____
_____

> Chris_Balsz wrote:
> >>Russia's problem is that it, from it's point of view, is watching what could be the first step of an invasion plan by it's long time adversary.
Pretty hard to defend yourself from under an enemy missile shield.<<

Under the NATO charter and the US constitution and the War Powers Act of 1973, should any foriegn power bombard NATO territory--successfully or not--then the US President can claim a state of war exists and attack that power with such force as he sees fit, for 72 hours without approval from Congress.

Were I President that would mean strategically decisive bombardment of their economy to a point incompatible with a motorized society.  Bomb them to horse-carts.

Without that WILL, you could build the Ultimate Dream Super Psychic Explodo Shield and still lose for the lack of balls to flip ON. <


I don't understand how that relates to my post, sorry, but I do feel that I must point out that each and every time someone has tried to annihlate Russia they have failed either due to their own stupidity or because they don't understand Russian strategy, and I must point out that modern Russian infrastructure was built with all out Nuclear War in mind. America's wasn't.

580

(126 replies, posted in General)

> ..Nemeara.. wrote:

> > avogadro wrote:

the /b/ channel in 4 chan is basically unmoderated with the exception of deleting of child pornography;  lots of bad stuff posted there.



eek hmm i wasnt aware, is it really that bad o_O?
someone forwarded me the pic, makes me wonder now yikes <


It's actually not as bad as people imagine, you just need a very well developed sense of humour. Or a warped one.
Don't forget that placed like 4chan are the birthplace of Anonymous, and anyone who dares to face the church of scientology can't be all bad.

581

(585 replies, posted in Community)

Only if you can answer the following questions correctly:

1) Give the generic names for the following:
a) http://tiny.cc/lUvFk
b) http://tiny.cc/x6xtj
c) http://tiny.cc/tHqTX

2) What's wrong with this picture?
http://tiny.cc/sNBPb

3) You are on holiday in Belgium when a very attractive woman who only speaks French attempts to get off with you. Do you allow it, and why?

582

(54 replies, posted in Politics)

> Chris_Balsz wrote:

> Sure they will, it's only fair; We got snotty about Cuba didn't we? <

FIXED

583

(220 replies, posted in Politics)

http://imgur.com/mTPIA.jpg

Hypocrites.

584

(54 replies, posted in Politics)

"I used to think that the Americans were just being difficult and pig headed but after looking at a world map it sort of makes sense the decision to have the missiles where they are."

  As long as you ignore little details like the maximum ranges of the missiles from BOTH sides. (Their ranges have them crossing over Greece... just).
As for Iran's version of the ICBM; American missile sheild uses wrong kind of missiles to stop them... actually now that I think of it I'm sure an ICBM would just "hop" over the Sheild's sphere of influence.
  So, in conclusion: Logical thought leads me to believe that the Missile Shield is the stick with which Little Timmy is poking the bear, to see if it is really dead.


"Russia's problem is that it wants to maintain a limited nuclear deterrent so it doesn't have to spend quite as much on expensive conventional forces and instead focus on rebuilding on the country. And its not fair to proclaim that just because the cold war is over that Russia should just demilitarise. What they are trying to do is streamline and further professionalise their army, and is using the nuclear deterrent as a temporary safety net while their armed forces are not up to scratch."

  Russia's problem is that the entire world honestly believes that the Shield is meant for Iranian missiles, not Russian ones. Russia's problem is that it, from it's point of view, is watching what could be the first step of an invasion plan by it's long time adversary.
Pretty hard to defend yourself from under an enemy missile shield.

__________
__________


"As a citizen of airstrip one I would rather the UK didn't make itself a potential target by being part of the site of a large weapons system and I would also prefer to have better relations with Russia so they don't switch the gas off. Participation in this neo cold war project seems to defeat both of those aims while delivering a defence against an old fashioned threat."

  How about the UK making itself a potential target by being the site of a large listening post, early warning system, the site of a nuclear deterrent system controlled by a country thousands of miles away, or a launching point for any attack/counter-attack against a hostile Russia.

Sorry mate, the decision was made twenty to thirty years before either of us was born, the UK is a target, and always will be as long as we continue to try and relive old glories through our colonial children, children who think they know better, children who hear the words "All Empires must Fall" coming from the thin, wrinkled lips of Brittannia and laugh.

585

(89 replies, posted in Roleplay)

Hopeless

Pennyless,
Jobless,
Homeless,
Worth Less.

586

(21 replies, posted in Community)

I sense lies in the force.

587

(52 replies, posted in General)

/me jumps on bandwagon

Looks: Not unattractive, but I don't usually find those jaws attractive (on women)  5/10
Voice: Too fast, slightly twangy; would score higher if she slowed down  4/10
Ability to sit still: Is there a sex toy stuck to the edge of that bath?  2/10
Personality: She's filmed herself giving fasion advice to the world  1/10

Total: 12/40

588

(11 replies, posted in General)

Starcraft isn't real? (T.T)

589

(32 replies, posted in General)

> Wild Flower Soul wrote:

> "Top 10 Reasons For Being German"

Whenever some german says to you and whatever their country did since WWII, you think (while listening to them):
Hitler, Hitler, Hitler, Hitler, Hitler, Hitler, Hitler, Hitler, Hitler, Hitler. <


It's not just me then? wink

__________


Top 10 Reasons For Being Russian

1 Vodka
2 Sauna, and Vodka
3 Sauna, Vodka, and rolling around in the snow, naked.
4 Country so massive it spans 12 hours
5 Army so massive they never need to worry about being flanked
6 Women so massive they never need to worry about being raped
7 Men so unhealthy they're dead by 55
8 Leader so evil he has his own puppet
9 Leader so evil he has his own theme tune
10 You have an actual nuclear death zone, which will come in handy for the movie business in about 10,000 years.

590

(7 replies, posted in General)

She looks WESTERN. That's the point! A growing number of asian "beauty" gurus are telling girls that if they want to be attractive they have to remove their racial characteristics.

LOVE YOUR BODY
on our terms

591

(7 replies, posted in General)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYlFN_zeHEI&feature=popular

One of a series of videos made by some asian girl who seems to think that all asian characteristics are ugly.
The series is targetted at asian teens.
I am honestkly so angry right now...
Sick.

592

(5 replies, posted in General)

/me nudges WSF, then waves hand over head
"WOOSH"

[edit]
Stranger: Are you a Female ?
You: No
You: You?
Your conversational partner has disconnected.
[/edit]

593

(5 replies, posted in General)

http://omegle.com/

Connecting to server...
You're now chatting with a random stranger. Say hi!
You: Hi
Stranger: hi
Stranger: 27,
You: guess again
Stranger: what?
You: Sorry, I thought you were trying to guess my age
You: can I guess yours?
Stranger: no, I said27D:
Stranger: 27
Stranger: u plz
You: now I am confused. smile
Stranger: asl pleas
Stranger: sorry.
Stranger: whats your name,gender,age,
You: 30, male, in the part of the library that does not overlook the teenage section big_smile
You: your turn
Stranger: female 27
Stranger: your job?
You: No job, I'm unemployable due to illness
Stranger: why?
You: Schizophrenia.
Stranger: really?!
Stranger: thats strange
You: Employers can be real dicks about ilnesses... what do you do?
Stranger: lawyer
You: eep.... can we forget about my location please?
You have disconnected.

594

(117 replies, posted in General)

@ Econ wrote:

See... now why did you have to spoil a perfectly good rumour-fest with actual facts? What are we going to pretend we know all about now?

595

(102 replies, posted in General)

Have you noticed that on the tribute shows they avoid using post 1985 images of michael as much as possible?

It makes me laugh in a grim, morbid kind of way. He's dead so NOW it's rude to point and ask "What the...?"

596

(585 replies, posted in Community)

You sure you belong in this thread?

597

(102 replies, posted in General)

I'm not dissing Earth Song, I'm dissing the retards that like it better than any other song ever made. tongue

598

(117 replies, posted in General)

Black Stig was Damon Hill.

Damon Hill didn't like his identity being kept a secret and started getting snotty about it, possibly because he wanted more input into the programme.

Top Gear hoofed him off.

White Stig was born.

White Stig has been more than one driver*.


*look at the gap between his gloves and his jumpsuit; some series' he's hairy, sometimes not, one time he was black... also saves having to deal with dickhead drivers and their dickhead egoes.

599

(102 replies, posted in General)

> avogadro wrote:
> "He didnt molest children"

and how do you know that? <


  Michael Jackson's personality type is that of a child, not a child molester. Trust someone who knows the difference.
I do not think he would have known what to do, or even be able to do it even if you told him how.
_____
_____



RIP Smooth Criminal.


_____
_____

PS:
What kind of retard thinks Earth Song was his best work EVER? Would it be the same kind of retard that thinks the last Matix film is the best film EVER because that is the one with the most special effects in it? tongue

600

(4 replies, posted in Politics)

Somewhere on the Internet there is an image of a child. Perhaps this child is naked, perhaps this child is wearing clothing that, if worn by a post-pubescent, would be sexually appealing to you? Perhaps this child is being abused. This image might even be real, rather than one of the ever growing number of artificial representations that are on the internet in the form of computer generated models, hand drawn images, or similar.
This image could be illegal. Artificial or not this image will effectively end your life, and why not? An owner of such material is effectively supporting the abuse depicted, so why not monitor the people using the Internet to catch these supporters of this most heinous of crimes?
But where do we stop?
What if I have images of a terrorist attack, am I supporting terrorism? What about my small collection of colour footage from Nazi Germany, should I be prosecuted for war crimes simply because I  have videos of burning 'tommy-cookers' or archive footage from the World War two death camps? Has a crime actually been commited?

  In my opinion the Internet is the realm of thought, it is a place of the human mind, and like it or not no crime has actually been comitted in owning images, no matter their content, just like no crime has been comitted in thinking 'people from X race are inferior to Y'. We should not confuse reality with fantasy, we should concentrate on the creator and purpetrator, not the passive viewer who keeps their darkest longings solely within their own mind, no matter how warped that mind may be.
  Some say that Internet censorship is being proposed to combat a real evil, I say they are trying to apply their morality to our mind, which can ultimately only lead to psychotic pandemic.


  Red Fokker, Devil's Advocate.