made me smile

is a vegan

t-mobile has the best deal, 15 a month you get 3 gig usage, but they won't cut you off if you go over that, just cut down your speeds a little.  make sure you check signal strength for where you're going to use it though as they can be a little flaky

is the original Material Girl

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zPYHIHFqtg

> Petrolstone wrote:

> Multiple languages is failure. The internet is letting us move forward with one world language. Everyone knows English is the language of the internet.

Misspelling on English here, should have been Engrish.  Just ask melvin or anyone on 4chan

likes to tinker with his 'GINA

delet0r!!!!!

Well imo whatever people want to do with their own bodies (and yes a foetus is part of that) is their business and nobody else's.

how about some other cases, such as when a rape victim falls pregnant as a result of the crime?  is it fair to make her keep the baby, knowing full well that that child will always remind her of the horrific ordeal she went through?  even further, if criminality is in any way genetic, is it fair to let that child live knowing that half it's genetic makeup is that of a rapists?  how about if people are using birth control, of whatever form and it fails? these people obviously don't want children, are doing everything they can to prevent having children, but get caught out due to whatever failings of the preventative measures.  can they not have the morning after pill, or if they felt secure in their preventatives, choose to have an abortion as they don't want a child at that point?

will you even follow this further, with the reasoning that sex should be for reproductive coupling and not for pleasurable purposes?  will you ban people from using preventative measures, which is again THEIR personal choice to do so  (or to not do so)?

is it fair to bring a child into a social situation where it will be unloved, uncared for, or unwanted?  can any of you actually say that it is without being completely heartless?

how about the situation in china, where overpopulation and agricultural issues have meant they've had to institute laws preventing people from having more children?  is it fair to bring a child into a situation where it will mean that themselves (and others) will starve?

ultimately the decision is one of personal choice, and rests with both parents.  either decision (yes/no) carries risk, emotional considerations, economic considerations (yes it's crass to view human life in this way but it's a fact that it is), and a big level of commitment.  neither decision should be taken lightly, and there should be more support for people facing this decision to help decide WHAT IS RIGHT FOR THEM INDIVIDUALLY.  There is no way you can make blanket regulations/guidelines on such a varied range of personal circumstances, and you shouldn't attempt to (something all of you have done).  It also shouldn't be a 'snap decision' by the people involved, there should be a proper framework of support over a set timeframe to enable an educated, well thought out final decision.

petrolstone is haxx0r

controls her hairwaves