the problem is the mods arent regulated by anyone but themselves.  stefan is gone.  he doesnt care.  all mods should be voted in.  if that was the case then i think you would see less bitching or at least less justified bitching

Yesterday 09:27:01

Arby3Moderator

Re: Official Politics Forum Warning Thread!

We debated on that topic with the mods/fmods yesterday.

There is no bias when it comes to blocks. I myself, have blocked strangers, people I don't care for, and friends alike. It's not always easy, but it must be done.

Start an idea thread. If there is a way to improve the mod selection, or enforcement of rules, or any other issue the community can think of, then start it there. We are open to ideas and change, contrary to popular belief.

i would rewrite rules entirely and spell out punishments.. we tried in think forum but it was shut down.  i would nominate zarf to rewrite all of them.

there is absolutely bias shown by the mods and fmods lol

loth has a personal vendetta against me for example because i said that he is one of the worst fmods ever which i don't think anyone has disagreed with

we tried to make changes to the rules in the think tank but that was quickly shut down and will never be revisited.

if this game was free and donations were actually considered donations in the true meaning of the word then i would say that the players have less support for bitching about how the game is run.  however, we all know that stefan has abandoned the game and the only changes made are made by other players that gracefully volunteer their time like pie and others.  the purpose of donations in a game like this is to put the money back into the game but we all know that that hasn't been done in the past many years.  therefore, the only reason people pay the vip price is to get the draft codes and few other perks that come along with it.  this game has thus become one that many people actually pay for to play rather than just giving donations out of their good nature and have every right to demand a more detailed rule set and some sort of consistency about handing out punishments.

i think most people including myself would shut up about it if the majority of players were allowed to amend the rules and some sort of appeals process was instituted rather than just relying on every mod/fmod to be impartial and construe the very ambiguous rules as they each seem fit with no sense of consistency

not a lot of incentive to buy vip when it only takes one vip to post yamas and unexplored yamas and there is a cap for drafts.

extra stuff seems highly logical.

agreed.  just stating another opinion

easy.  iranian flag

this is why i think zarfemon would be good to head up the task force to make editions to the rules currently in place.  at least he can respond and not dodge the issues

who let you out of arsy's dungeon genesis?!!!

[nothing about topic just trolling and personal insults]

the problem pain is that the current rule set allows them to do anything they want and give no reasoning for what they do.  there was supposed to be a serious discussion in think tank about changing the rules but as expected the mods shut it down quickly and were unopen to the changes suggested. nothing in this game will change until the current team is gone and mods are chosen in a different manner

if they were serious about being fair then they would start up a seperate forum for it like they did for the honor forum and put someone in charge that can have an intelligent back and forth discussion about rules and policies like zarf

anyways you guys may as well close the thread because it's not going to go anywhere

i liked bret hart the most