4,376

(12 replies, posted in Politics)

being prosecuted and punished will also have effect when they have to do it to millions of people

you and zarf can have the pieces to put back together

i decided reading mom's Readers Digests in the 1980s that if I had to live behind the Iron Curtain I'd rather be a prisoner than a slave

well here it is and here I am

4,377

(40 replies, posted in Politics)

"Van Chester Thompkins was considered a suspect in a fatal shooting on January 10, 2000 in Southfield, Michigan. After advising Thompkins of his Miranda rights, police officers interrogated him. Thompkins did not state at any time that he wanted to rely on his right to remain silent, nor that he did not want to talk to the police, nor that he wanted an attorney. The court record suggested that he had been almost completely silent during the 3-hour interrogation and the few sporadic comments he made had no bearing on the case[3] (police described it as "nearly a monologue"[4]), but near the end, detectives changed their approach and "tried a spiritual tac[k]" [5] and an "appeal to his conscience and religious beliefs".[6] Thompkins was asked in sequence - did he believe in God, did he pray to God, and did he pray to God to forgive him for shooting the victim. He answered "yes" to each of these.[1][2] Thompkins made a motion to suppress his statements, claiming that he had invoked his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent, that he had not waived that right, and that his inculpatory statements were involuntary. The trial court denied his motion and Thompkins was found guilty by a jury and sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Of note, there had been significant other evidence of guilt corroborating the conviction.[7]"

I know of nothing in the Bill of Rights that requires cops to stop interrogating the guilty when the guilty don't tell them to stop and send in a criminal defense attorney.   It is fair and reasonable that people tell the police they will not make any statements until they have seen an attorney.

Citizens United is a great example of the Democrats stripping us of our rights. Citizens United was a non-profit corporation set up by citizens to express their viewpoint.

"In the wake of these decisions allowing the promotion of the documentary Fahrenheit 9/11 during the 2004 campaign, Citizens United sought to run television commercials during the 2008 campaign promoting its political documentary Hillary: The Movie, which is critical of then-Senator Hillary Clinton, and to air the movie on DirecTV.[8] In January 2008, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the commercials violated provisions in the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (McCain

4,378

(40 replies, posted in Politics)

The alternative to making life harder for career politicians is to destroy the Bill of Rights and submit every person in the United States to unlimited robbery by arbitrary government.  That is what the Democrat agenda demands.  Either it gets a bloody nose or the Constitution is torn to pieces.  And when the moral authority of the government goes, the government is also going to go.  Don't pretend that people are going to cooperate out of love for Congress and the Presidency.  Or that a country incapable of deporting 13 million illegal aliens is in any state to enforce its tyranny.

4,379

(40 replies, posted in Politics)

What bluff? 

You mean, if they sit it out?  Wait them out longer.

You mean something else? Please explain.

4,380

(4 replies, posted in General)

Pearl Carter, 72, says she has never been happier after beginning an incestuous relationship with her 26-year-old grandchild Phil Bailey.

new Idea Magazine
The pensioner, from Indiana, US, is using her pension to pay a surrogate mother so they can have a child, reports New Zealand's New Idea magazine.

She said: "I'm not interested in anyone else's opinion. I am in love with Phil and he's in love with me.

"Soon I'll be holding my son or daughter in my arms and Phil will be the proud dad."

Her lover is the son of Pearl's daughter Lynette Bailey - who she put up for adoption when she was 18-years-old.

When his mother passed away, Phil tracked down his long lost grandmother and they quickly fell in love.

Pearl told New Idea magazine: "From the first moment that I saw him, I knew we would never have a grandmother-grandson relationship.

"For the first time in years I felt sexually alive."

It was during their second week together, after dinner and wine, that Pearl made her move.

"I called Phil into my bedroom, sat him on the bed, and then I leant over and kissed him," she added.

"I expected rejection but instead he kissed me back."

Phil revealed: "I wanted to kiss her there and then. My feelings were overwhelming.

"I love Pearl with all my heart. I've always been attracted to older women and I think Pearl is gorgeous. Now I'm going to be a dad and I can't wait.

"Yes, we get laughed at and bullied when we go out and kiss in public but we don't care. You can't help who you fall for."

The pair paid $54,000 (£35,000) to find a surrogate mother and buy a donor egg to inseminate with Phil's sperm.

They placed an advert asking for an open-minded surrogate, and Roxanne Campbell applied.

"Initially I was shocked," says Roxanne, 30. "But they're a brilliant pair and I saw how much they loved each other. I know the baby will be loved too."

Pearl said: "I am finally going to be a mum and not forced to give up my child. Phil's going to be a great dad.

"I never in a million years thought at 72 I'd be 'pregnant' and in love with my grandson.

"I make no apologies and I believe God's given me a second chance."



Read more: http://www.momlogic.com/2010/04/indiana_grandmother_is_having.php#ixzz1ij5T9VHX

4,381

(40 replies, posted in Politics)

>>And budgets require... the President, majority of the House, and 60 votes in the Senate to pass!  The GOP tried to assert its ideal funding already with the budget debates, despite having only a majority in the House... to no avail.  Regardless, you still need this crazy thing called a democratic majority... something TheYell doesn't seem to like when it doesn't fit his motives.<<

Wrong.

The House had the power to refuse to pass ANY budget except the one it likes.  Nobody else can even start with a budget.  If the Senate votes it down or refuses to vote they can change a , to a ; and send it back as a different bill.  They shoulda done that forever til global markets forced the Senate and Obama to cave on it.


It was the HOUSE, not the SENATE, who has the leverage in funding bills.  And they caved.  Boehner went behind closed doors, came out with a surrender, and ordered all good loyal Republicans to and i quote the man here "GET YOUR ASS IN LINE" and they did.  It happens every time and it's pathetic.  It's pathetic and  unforgiveable because that same discipline would deliver absolute victory--if they had the wisdom to go for it.

4,382

(12 replies, posted in Politics)

What's sad about it?  Sad is trying to raise kids as America enters dictatorship.

4,383

(40 replies, posted in Politics)

please he is a wanker who will explode the budget as well as Bush or Obama and the veterans in GOP will be glad to help him, that is why they are lining up behind  him.  they WANT to convert the GOP into the Not-Democrat party ---"So what everything sucks, if you don't like Democrats come on in"  that way they can screw up anyway they like

they have looked at the last 30 years and they put their finger on where it all went wrong for Republicans:

Republicans promised but refused to deliver

so they hit on the solution

don't promise anything!

They won't even promise to repeal Obamacare, in fact the Republican House funded it and will fund it again, and they are already saying that if they don't have the White House , the House, and 60 votes in the Senate they can't touch it.  And if the public doesn't give them that dictatorial power immediately then  they can never repeal it ever.  There is no point to a professional association of career politicians that just wants to defeat Democrats, and they can't hold it togetehr.  They already failed in 2005-2006.

4,384

(12 replies, posted in Politics)

Obama

and revolt.

Yeah I am serious.  There's no point obeying tyrants who think the Bill of Rights is toilet paper, that I'll work for 25 years and pay all the taxes they order AND buy where they tell me to buy.  To hell with them, I'll take federal prison first.

4,385

(25 replies, posted in General)

if you have to specify makeup then she aint that hot

4,386

(17 replies, posted in Politics)

that sux that you are that sensitive

4,387

(21 replies, posted in Politics)

We'll have a lot to share over the next election year, thought I'd have one catchbin thread

I'll start!

http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/TheYell/HeeeeeresObama.png


I did not touch these up, just put them side by side

4,388

(23 replies, posted in General)

"On the first night the girl had brought him tea. Bond had looked at her severely.

4,389

(48 replies, posted in Politics)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfOXhGbwdm0&feature=related

4,390

(23 replies, posted in General)

i too like coffee i had 2 kinds of cofee today I had jack in the box coffee yum i had burger king coffee yum i will go have some office yuban yum I am fully prodcutve shame I am not realy doing any work at all whee i have the energy i am energy man wheee

weeeee

4,391

(12 replies, posted in Politics)

Emi it looks like the guys who run VA GOP should be prosecuted for fraud

VA law says you gotta have 10,000 valid signatures
VA law says the state party needs to do the verifying
VA law says the state party draws up the rules for doing it

so the VA GOP made a rule : drop 10,000 signed pieces of paper on their desk and they'd stamp it verified.

somebody sued, so the VA GOP changed that rule around Halloween:  drop 15,000 signed pieces of paper on their desk and they call it verified.  Any less and they run the names in a computer against a list of addresses to check if they're accurate.

VA GOP says Gingrich brought about 12,000 signatures and Perry 11,900.   Now prior to this October the VA GOP would have rubberstamped them as qualified.
However this time they ran the names into computer list and Perry lost 5800, over half, and Gingrich lost enough to drop below 10,000.
Ron Paul brought in 14,000, the VA GOP says they spent 7 hours checking and he had well over 10,000 so they qualified him.
Romney dropped 15,000 signatures on their desk so they qualified him without checking.  They said nobody ever got 15,000 signatures with a 33% failure rate so he must have made it.

bunch of things wrong

1.  I don't know how anybody can read state law and say, "well since I have the duty to swear something is true, and the right to chart my own methods, I can swear its true without checking it."  I'm pretty sure Virginia, which has been around the block govt-wise, has something about making a declaration of fact that isn't true.   Even if VA allowed it, federal elections have to be fair and give equal protection to all candidates.

2.  VA GOP hasn't offered its list of addresses for anybody to verify.

3.  VA GOP hasn't explained how it checked.   Did it run 1000 names and find a failure rate it then extrapolated to the whole submission?  That would explain how Perry can get 50% off and Ron Paul passes "easily".

4.  If Romney failed as bad as Perry, he didn't qualify either.  But the VA GOP doesn't believe he could fail so it certified he didnt/


I think the whole GOP ballot in VA should be discarded

4,392

(17 replies, posted in Politics)

they should smuggle in homemade cake, pie and lasagna in little plastic bags for sale in the hallways

4,393

(25 replies, posted in General)

they'd all just pick Johnny Depp who came up when they created this list of 10 in IRC anyway

4,394

(24 replies, posted in General)

walking pnuemonia

4,395

(4 replies, posted in Politics)

2 days.
26 views.
0 Comments.

FLAWLESS VICTORY

4,396

(25 replies, posted in General)

fail

you rejected those who "look like somebody's mom"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=cxA6QZjCJ60

if only more people had listened to Archie Bunker

4,398

(12 replies, posted in Politics)

i dont know this is news to anybody outside the USA because the only controversy in America is about people who see the videos paul made over the past 20 years touting the newsletters, and the scans of the newsletters, but insist the only reason people gang up on Ron Paul is because they hate freedom

4,399

(3 replies, posted in General)

now we know who put the shield generator on a tower on top of the star destroyer

4,400

(38 replies, posted in Politics)

Rin is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I've ever known in my life