401

(83 replies, posted in Politics)

> avogadro wrote:
> > ☭ Fokker wrote:
> You are aware that the Earth is finite, and therefore any natural resources are also finite, right? I ask because I get the impression from your post that you see them as infinite, or at least not finite enough for you to worry about it.


i am aware the earth is finite. the thing is that we are utilizing nowhere near all of the earth. so to say that technology cant increase the amount of humans the earth can support is nonsense, because technology can help us utilize more of the earth, which would allow the earth to support more humans... <


...And less of God's creatures.
  I would think a Christian (of any sort) would have more respect for God's creation, regardless of how they define being given "dominion" of a world.

402

(116 replies, posted in Politics)

> Blind Guardian wrote:

> Obviously I didn

403

(187 replies, posted in Politics)

"considering the huge penalties for converting from Islam that exist in some countries"

My local shop keeper cannot go home to visit his family because he will be behedded (or something like that) for converting to Catholicism (for love). No one he knows even believes, apparently, but they say that they are for an easy life... kinda like when I used to say I believed in Santa and God.

404

(30 replies, posted in Politics)

Serve The Hive!

405

(83 replies, posted in Politics)

You are aware that the Earth is finite, and therefore any natural resources are also finite, right? I ask because I get the impression from your post that you see them as infinite, or at least not finite enough for you to worry about it.

406

(585 replies, posted in Community)

Can't remember the last time I played anything sad

407

(9 replies, posted in General)

Stopped liking house music when it started taking itself seriously, roughly around the first Moby period.

408

(282 replies, posted in General)

DC

Batman or Predator?

409

(14 replies, posted in Roleplay)

I bet that would look awesome in slow-mo.

410

(24 replies, posted in Community)

Key! (^_^)/

411

(22 replies, posted in General)

I think most IE users are either new, at work, in a library, or simply don't know any better (I used IE for almost 10 years before switching).

412

(30 replies, posted in Politics)

I thought it was common knowledge that the Nazi scientists were actively sabotaging their own program?

413

(11 replies, posted in Politics)

Given the amount of pirate-tv websites based in China, I'd say the latter.

414

(83 replies, posted in Politics)

So... the way to deal with overpopulation and the possibility of over-straining the Earth to breaking point is to curb consumerism?

(I'd ask you to back up your other point but apparently we don't do that here anymore)

415

(116 replies, posted in Politics)

> Blind Guardian wrote:

> Thank you for your academic's blog post link, Fokker. I think you misread my point. Because your link supports it. In its ridiculously overly verbose, overly obvious way. <

I didn't misread your point. I misunderesimated your inelligents.
I know the link appears to support you, but it is backhanded, it still contains proof that what you said is wrong:

http://entrepreneurship.sbsblogs.co.uk/medical-innovation/why-is-innovation-in-the-nhs-often-hard-to-achieve/

Now, I say again, why does this article ask why innovation is difficult under the NHS if, as you say, innovation is impossible under any kind of NHS system?


> My point is that the free market skips ALL of that bullshit because everyone is motivated by what produces profit, and people who purchase their own care and providers who sell it to those people all want the best care. <

Keyword: profit.
I know what you're thinking, "They have to innovate," right? "In order to survive. They have to cure illnesses, not treat symptoms. People won't buy a shitty product. A shitty health company would die." Right?
Small problem with that line of thinking, something EVERYONE forgets:

Consumers are thick.

How many times have you bought shit, knowing it was shit, simply because you couldn't be arsed to find, or didn't know how to find, better? Hell, how many times have you done this without realising?

Africa's inability to produce it's own anti-retroviral drugs = America's profit
Stupid = Profit



> [...] Though of course you always have the option of spending trillions on government involvement which inevitably reduces the quality of care. <

  Would now be a bad time to mention that the NHS is in the so-called mess it's in because of years of lack of government interest?

"Education, education, education!"
"But Mr Blair, what about healthcare? Mr Blair? Did he hear me?"


> This stuff isn't rocket science. Like the idiots on the news today actually explaining why government spending is great for economies: they just don't get it. They're 100% wrong. And no matter how many idiots have an interest in buying into a retarded and dead-wrong ideology, it's still absolutely 100% wrong. <

  I was thinking the exact same thing, but my pun involves brain surgery. wink

416

(17 replies, posted in General)

> Archangel wrote:

> From what I've read, teleportation is 100% impossible, at least at our current level of understanding. What is possible (at least in theory) is to transfer all the data about, for example, arocalex - all his dna, age etc, and then recreate a body of the exact same specifications at the other end, and stick the consciousness in that copy. I dunno how this works with memories though tongue <


Parts of consciousness can be copied from brain to brain, or rather transmitted into one brain from another. The problems arise when the recipient brain tries to make sense of the new data, but this should not be a problem for a "blank" brain.
_____
_____

So does this mean that we will now live forever by simply growing a new body every 10 years or so?

417

(282 replies, posted in General)

Good thing your name does all the answering for you. tongue


Doesn't matter, I can't get it up with people watching.
But if I have to pick, Dad so I can jam it down his throat at the last second. big_smile

Would you rather be punched in the face by a fat man with knuckle-dusters
or
have your eye clawed out by a thin man with long nails?

418

(22 replies, posted in General)

I think the numbers are skewed by the fact that FF is most popular so criminal minds logically target FF first.

419

(282 replies, posted in General)

Rosie O'Donnell.
Yeah, she has her flaws, but I've heard she's kinky.

Would you rather go on a date with Adolph Hitler or Idi Amin?

420

(14 replies, posted in Roleplay)

*pop*

421

(24 replies, posted in Community)

Ok, this thread is seriously disapointing me, someone had better get very salty very quickly or I'm gonna complain X(

422

(57 replies, posted in Community)

"You can have sex when you're single, and there a considerable financial risks of being married. You may enjoy some tax benefits, but I don't think they're worth the high risk of divorce."

There is only a high risk of divorce if you are an idiot who married for idiot reasons like; you've had sex, you've known each other for one whole month, you have one thing in common, you're afraid of dying alone, you're afraid of being single, you're afraid they'll be (or continue to be) unfaithful if you don't marry.

The more I thnk about it the more I think the Indians got it right.

423

(116 replies, posted in Community)

I miss thwe old God, the one with the fire and the brimstone...

424

(14 replies, posted in Roleplay)

In a way he's right, but if you literally took a submarine and put it in orbit (somehow) it would pop.
...
Not reading it any more, my computer died. Now I could blame it on me trying to be clever, or I could blame it on that over-targetted-at-an-audience story. wink

425

(282 replies, posted in General)

sex with a trannie

Would you rather rather be stalked by a homosexual or a homeless?