elaborate on mutal reward or return without making your statement redundant. if a mutually satisfying relationship is a mutual reward or return, then the statement is redundant...
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Posts by avogadro
elaborate on mutal reward or return without making your statement redundant. if a mutually satisfying relationship is a mutual reward or return, then the statement is redundant...
well, if she sat over his upper torso, even if some of her weight was on the bed or ground or whatever, for him to breathe, he would have to push up which would involve lifting the woman which would be the full 300 lbs....
doesnt 58 cm sound more impressive?
stop stealing american forms of measurement!!! america is evil!!
all lcd's are flat...
as for why you would want a larger screen because 23" is smaller then the ideal monitor size....
also, whats with you crazy euro's using inches, convert it to damn cm, you lazy bums!
i like the smell of smoke.... and i dont even smoke... im gonna miss it when the ban on smoking in public places in my state is finally enacted..
im not interested in proving you wrong... you will change your theory on relationships just like you have constantly changed your theory on women in the past... i wont deny that there is some semblance of truth, just like there was some truth in your past statements about women...
Justinian, the most pathetic poster in all of IC....
please tell us again how you know for a fact that all relationships are based on convenience just because a couple personal examples were
> OmegaFlareKyle wrote:
> lol yeah I dont actually like beer at alll, but its the same point cuz its like
orly?
also, Stella is Piss water... drink some Goddamn Bitter!
werent all those things true 20 years ago? but the pubs are closing now?
the pubs closing because of the economy? because of the smoking laws? because of something else?
interesting read.....
arfeh, whats the difference between a bar and a pub?
> Ehawk wrote:
>
wheather its fear of death, lonelyness, unhappyness etc., religion seems to be the human response to these situations. ofcourse your not going to agree with me, your religious, its only natural that your going to view your belief structure in a more optimistic view. MYSELF, an atheist, has the ability to look at religion from a different perspective.
you have time and again shown little understanding for religion.... i have time and again corrected false assumptions you have made, many of the time making you look like a fool.
also, people arent born religious; i wasnt born believing in a God, and i have looked critically at religion many a times before and after i became religious...
i was talking about divine punishment with what catholicism doesnt have.... Catholicism isnt if you dont follow these things, God will punish you. Its if you dont strive for these things, you wont truly be happy...
and im pretty sure none of the ones i listed have an insurance policy after life expiration either...
"well, religion is generated by fear" isnt right either. Religion like science is generated by man's desire to improve himself...
> Ehawk wrote:
BTW, avo wrote:
"alot of religions dont even beleive in life after death"
name some. "alot" my ass. see i can nit-pick too ![]()
__________
Aladura
Confucianism
Deism
Epicureanism
Falun Gong
Judaism (depending on sect)
Stoicism
Taoism
Unitarian Universalism
> Justinian I wrote:
> Religions also have a common theme of providing rules that are intended to be obeyed, with divine punishments or rewards for certain actions. That effectively causes fear.
im not sure about every form of religion, but the largest sect of the largest religion, Catholicism doesnt.
"5. fear is generated by god"
arent you contradicting yourself? you said God creates fear and then you say religion is used to cope with fear.... which is it?
alot of religions dont even beleive in life after death... so how would they make the fear of death less frightening?
most religions dont instill fear...
and ehawk proves how little he knows of the nature of most religions...
> ☭ Fokker wrote:
> > avogadro wrote:
> " Pray-tell, what is the reason?"
there isnt a single reason... the quote you gave was simply pointing out that the difference between an atheists and christians is not "intelligence, IQ, education, or ability to think for yourself" <
Bullshit! Here is the original quote:
> Lord Soccer wrote:
> do people really need a religion to tell u what to believe, can u not think for urself?
i find it hard to believe that God created everything, he is just part of a religion that was made up, like many other religions out there that were made up, many have their own gods, maybe they created everything, i think not.
many of the greatest minds in history were religious people; while you may not beleive in a god, dont delude yourself into believing that the reason you dont beleive in a god is a result of your intelligence, IQ, education, or ability to think for yourself...
Goddbye, coward.
when lord soccer wrote "do people really need a religion to tell u what to beleive, can u not think for urself" was he not infering that religious people cannot think for themselves? is not the reason why there are people that dont think for themeselves usually either intelligence, IQ, or education? yeah, thats what i thought, it is... so yes, i was doing exactly what i was claiming to be doing; thanks for digging up the quote for me...
> ..Nemeara.. wrote:
> oh you lot get yr own thread, this one is for movies ![]()
and why am i scaring you blondeh
?
yar, its unfortunate that undead couldnt behave by the standards he holds others to and had to interrupt this thread with personal attacks...
> [TI] Lateralis wrote:
> @ avo
I suspect - although I obviously can't say for definite! - that the way in which you said what you said rubbed a few people up the wrong way. You said that the script, acting and so forth was terrible, but said it in a way as to imply it was a fact. In reality, this is just your opinion, and you provided nothing to backup your opinion.
theres nothing i could provide other then someone else's review to back up the claim which i eventually did. and i dont think i ever implied it was fact.... obviously like and dislike for a movie is 100% opinion...
"avogadro, are you a fat republican?"
im not republican and im not fat
"i think you're just angry the people in the movie were democrat blue instead of republican red!"
not at all. i dont have a problem when movies or shows have political messages when its done well. for example, the Simpsons makes fun of conservatives and liberals but they do it well and make it fairly enjoyable, this movie did not.
Imperial Forum → Posts by avogadro
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.