if medicare is a guide it will be 30x what it was projected to be within 20 years.

i didn't think we'd sink so low

the moral guilt of america is established

X(

I didn't say have no protection. I said they should have defined "disabled" and "reasonable accommodation" in the law, when they wrote the law. 
Nobody wants a vague warm fuzzy of good intentions - they want to force their boss to obey a law.  And when the law does not spell out what is required, or who is covered, it not only fails to help people some of the time - it fails EVERY time.  EVERY claim of an ADA violation had to be tested with a lawsuit, to begin with.  Only over 20 years have the courts provided definitions that could have been provided instantly by Congress.

I don't think the above example is extreme.   I don't think a paraplegic who can medically sit behind a desk for 40 hours a week, can sue his employer for asking him to sit behind a desk 40 hours a week.   I think you'd see them suing over other work restrictions which he cannot meet.

he has a woman and he coaches America's youth in healthy sports

sad alternatives to IC

"It kind of got buried in the /r/politics thread, but this group seems to be where Santorum is getting his numbers from. He's not actually making things up, he's just quoting others who are making things up.
>The Remmelink Report

Written by a Dutchman who put his own relative through the chutes.

(And isn't that extremely odd, given how RARE it is.)

BTW

"The Remmelink Report found that 0.8 percent of the deaths at the time were done without the explicit request of the patient; in 59 percent of the cases, the physician had some information about the patient

Here's a link to  a position paper from last year by KNMG

KNMG
The KNMG physicians

LAPD isn't like it was before the 1991 riots.

Trust us.

Nope.  Your first reactions to this news was that Rick Santorum was making the whole thing up to scaremonger the weak.

When it was pointed out to you, that your own government said that's what your doctors were up to, and Rick Santorum got his figures from your government, THEN you insist that he has no right to use a 20-year-old report since OF COURSE things are different...

There's no OF COURSE about it.  Iran is still run the way it was in 1980.  If you've made changes go ahead and show us.  And we're not just arguing about tax rates, or inflation.  We're talking about a fat chunk of your medical profession, causing 10% of fatalities in your kingdom, most of the time without the consent of the victim.  And your prosecutors looking the other way whenever it was shown, after the fact, that the patient COULD HAVE lawfully asked for it and received it, so, the fact they never did was just some technical violation.

I'd have said OF COURSE you'd never sink that low, but since you DID, you forfeit a presumption that you would never ever ever really do that.

"Rick Santorum is talking about our present day situation I presume, as there is no relevance to talk about a situation of 20 years ago in the present tense when things have changed in the meantime. (unless you're trying to falsify information)"

then go ahead and announce you changed it as baldly as you  informed us of how bad it was, before you guys get miffed that we read your own govts reports

whew reading that I was afraid he was gonna ask for asylum here

when your own govt says 10% of your national deaths were caused by doctors injecting poison, most of the time without consent, I don't see how you get pissed that an American read the report

you can explain how that's no longer the case, instead of whining we paid attention to the facts of life over there