3,251

(394 replies, posted in Universal News)

lol, Rainin Attackers hardly ever go head to head, so Leader vs Leader is actually a better way to explain what I'm saying, and in this instance (the First war we had) WS beat you.

3,252

(394 replies, posted in Universal News)

> Rainin wrote:

Okay first you act all bad and now you're sucking WS penis?  Legend of IC... The real legends of IC dont need to talk shit.  I can name some of you really feel it necessary.




Like i said dude you started the Name calling and chest beating, I just said you got beat by WS, but ok I'll restate what happened so you can understand it, Our Alliance Beat yours, WS, Hydro_P and nightwish out played your Fam because we had Superior Infra, Activity and Skill. We destroyed your Allies quickly then were going to totally destroy your Fam, we NAPed and then you dumped your old allies for Mizzle because they were stronger. (poor Flash).

3,253

(394 replies, posted in Universal News)

Actually I didnt mean that comment for you yomama, I meant Rainin. lol as for your last comment, are you Talking about me or Silv? because he would kill me hands down before I saw him coming lol.

3,254

(394 replies, posted in Universal News)

And if I was you I'd stfu too, lol

3,255

(394 replies, posted in Universal News)

@ WS, yeah sorry, I think you/we beat him, I'm really not a Complete Moron just a little bit. I will edit. tongue


@ Silv, Ofc I'm being carried in my Fam I havent claimed that I'm owning anything am I? And yes we beat you fools, wheres your first allies Silv? lol. I can talk big because I am big, you started the name calling douche, I cant wait for you to get schooled (again) by the Legend of IC.

3,256

(394 replies, posted in Universal News)

^ your a Fluffen Ch0mp, Our Alliance killed yours meaning WS beat you, take your technicalities elsewhere flukewit, in the upcoming war you still will be hardly fighting WS, think before you call someone a Moron you Rooster lover.


Excuses about a Bad start are for Fluffen losers, so fluff off with it.

3,257

(8 replies, posted in Drafting)

you in MW this round HC? What Fam?

3,258

(16 replies, posted in Universal News)

Update!

3,259

(394 replies, posted in Universal News)

> Flash[light]ning wrote:


inactivity did that for you guys tongue




Yup your right Flash, although our Attackers were Uber active also, but yeah your guys went inactive.

3,260

(69 replies, posted in Ideas)

^ something new please Glue, we all know Parrot Smells.

3,261

(394 replies, posted in Universal News)

> Tryme wrote:

> Parrot you are mistaking... rainin is silvarian not rain...

for all i know rainin is 100 times better and i'm not so sure WS is gonna be able to beat him wink




lol, already beat him once this round, actually destroyed his first alliance.

3,262

(394 replies, posted in Universal News)

lol

3,263

(394 replies, posted in Universal News)

> Flash[light]ning wrote:

> i say you all lose as everyone else gangs up and rapes your asses big_smile




It may be so Flash, but you Fags wont be joining in, we already "raped your asses" to a P-nap lol

3,264

(69 replies, posted in Ideas)

I guess it would be no NAPs nor Allies, so I think it would be great, Plus we could (IC Community) vote on who the Leaders would be, ofc they would have to put thier names forward to WANT to lead, but this way we could get some cool match-ups too.

3,265

(69 replies, posted in Ideas)

I like them all, lets do all three (one after the other ofc), tournament style, same Fams different scenarios...

3,266

(69 replies, posted in Ideas)

Very, very interested, I'll play in whatever Galaxy I'm allowed in, you nUrds talk it over, just count me in. wink

3,267

(465 replies, posted in Universal News)

no it does not Nandro, its #4292 thats turning me on tongue


man its funny lol

3,268

(22 replies, posted in Community)

lol

3,269

(527 replies, posted in Universal News)

haha classic big_smile

3,270

(46 replies, posted in General)

> OmegaGenesis wrote:

> > East wrote:

> in a one on one enagement the F22 seems like a likely candidate

but in a major conflict individual quality is not necessarily the war winner, but factors like manufacturing costs, reliability and durability come into play



There had been a thought for this already East. Since one of the obvious drawbacks to the F-22 is the limited amount of armament it can carry due to all weapons being concealed within the plane a fix action for a large scale fight would have been this:

Send out a flight of two F-22's that would be basically recon aircraft, with their advanced stealth and radar they could target a massive amount of aircraft. A B-1 Lancer would be custom fitted with two "Gatling gun" style air to air missile launchers yet could be located very far back. The F-22 would pass all target information instantly and basically the B-1 would unleash hell.

Also some sources say the F-22 can act as a mini AWAC's plane because it's radar is so good and how close it can get without detection. In some cases it has picked up targets before the AWACs.







Argument settled.

3,271

(14 replies, posted in Community)

Have a great day Chris wink

3,272

(112 replies, posted in Universal News)

so whos fighting who now?

3,273

(43 replies, posted in Universal News)

(1) Darkmason


(2) BC Cougar

3,274

(45 replies, posted in Universal News)

^correct

3,275

(45 replies, posted in Universal News)

no mean feat I assure you mate, I'm an active in a fail Fam with nothing else to do on a Sunday Afternoon but Troll the Forums wink.