False? Great, then we don't have to care who can't afford more kids.
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Posts by The Yell
False? Great, then we don't have to care who can't afford more kids.
And you dance around the bit where global family has to suit YOUR purpose, global government has to suit YOUR purpose, global economy has to suit YOUR purpose, and it is all the SAME purpose, and no alternative can be tolerated.
"" and innovation and improvement crushed lest the authority of the robbers/dividers be compromised by some smart boy with a bright idea."
This more accurately describes our current economic paradigm, not the one I would want to see come about."
Every dollar spent on a space program could be spent by somebody to raise another kid. True or False?
Since your goal is abundance, and your chosen metric is the number of kids people want to have but aren't given the wealth to have, how do you get a space program until everybody has all the kids they want?
"I do not demand this. Instead, I would say that the whole purpose of an economy should be views as to provide for an over-abundance every basic need of every human and do so in balance with the environment and with respect for other life on the planet."
We've been through this before...you imagine some Authority will judge when somebody has Too Much and give it to somebody else who deserves it more. Such as, a person who wants to have more kids.
True or False?
Neither one!
Your demand to rob the producers and creators to satisfy every lifestyle whim of the poor has been tried and everywhere it is tried, it turns society and industry into a closed circle, where consumption is reduced to the lowest common denominator, production repressed to satisfy consumption, and innovation and improvement crushed lest the authority of the robbers/dividers be compromised by some smart boy with a bright idea.
Every. Time. Its why Cuba still imports cars 60 years after glorious revolution.
YOU YOURSELF have defined oppression as denying the poor the resources to have as many kids as they themselves desire. Won
poor people having all the children they can imagine and demanding other people pay for it is not fulfillment of the poor it's degradation of the children
I would like 5 cars
I can't afford 5 cars
elp elp I'm bein repressed
and the Wineville Murders were just outside town too, that was the basis for the movie "Changeling"
maybe we're situated on a portal to Hell
would explain a lot
i carry a razor sharp folding knife everywhere I go
have done since college
because on my campus a guy got thrown down and handcuffed to a fence and raped
so I'm prepared to cut my own throat
come to think that was UC Riverside, where that Aurora shooter got his degree
also Riverside Community College down the street was the site of the first kill by the Zodiac killer
decades apart of course
but a clear tradition
if you have a methane fire and open vents to surrounding areas you get a fireball inferno
napalms the smell of love in the morning
now I have to see it
2 people versus 12 gang members is just twice the fun
was born under a wandrin star
If I win the lottery I'll build a belt-fed .416 Barrett Gatling gun with a barbette on a 360-degree horizontal, -20degre-+60degree swivel mount atop a wheeled chassis.
Which will be legal in CA.
Because our gun control nuts are idiots.
with the cost of things my first gun may be a black powder .44 from Cabelas
but for personal defense that and a bowie knife should do fine. There's no lawful self defense situation where you have to shoot 40 times over 100 yards away...and if such a need should arise, I'll steal a .308 rifle
I can piss further and tighter than I can sneeze, doesn't mean I wanna be in a gunfight holding my...you know
oh wait
http://media.treehugger.com/assets/images/2011/10/paul-mccartney.jpg
maybe rich people could act poor
Wouldn't you be flooding the poor pool with noninnovative greedy uncooperative types?
Would something happen to rich people with 2 kids that took away their wealth?
" It would be better for our species' evolution, then, to change the socioeconomic paradigm so that it is the poor instead of the rich who are more biologically successful. As such, there should be a 1 child policy for rich people only, and increase child grants and other benefits for the poor."
What happens if they have 2 kids?
Personally I think the M16 has had its day, since our ability to surround five guys with 100 Marines who call in a $40 million aircraft to drop 500 lbs of explosives into his apartment building are numbered in the era of YouTube.
Also in places like Afghanistan you can't always get within 400 yards of the enemy, so there are Taliban with scars from American rifle fire who have a funny story of a slight burn they got one day...
The point of private gun ownership in the US is the maintenance of the authority of the People to operate independent of government permission.
Imperial Forum → Posts by The Yell
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.