"what causes our desires for acting for the greater good? Impulse? Pre-natural desire implanted into us via some supernatural cause? Does this imply we are all good to start? What exactly is "good"? Does the good require us to act in such a manner that we are forced into deciding each action?"

  The need to ensure the continued survival of our offspring, even when we are too ill, old, or dead to do so ourselves, means that we all strive to create an "all good" world for our young ones, a world where they can survive without threats in relative comfort and plenty.
  Problems tend to arise for us as a species when we think beyond the basics, when we get selfish:

"I want..." because you don't have children, or do have children but somehow hate them
or "I want my children..." to have red ferrari's on their 14th birthdays because I wanted one when I was 14 rather than a lesson on how to be a decent human being.
No I don't care if that will turn my children into disgusting human beings and ruin the future; they've done nothing but look cute, ask "daddeeeeeeeee..." and churn out blow jobs to all of the popular boys who also just so happen to have rich dads.

Try again.

Would you rather Listen to an album by the Smurfs or the Chipmunks?

And Basement cat blinked in the light and said,"was sleep, dreemin. mad now, get you", and so the eternal struggle began.

Just thought I'd pop in and say hello whilst I was on my way to the joke shop.
Hello.
/enters Job Centre
I DESERVE FREE MONEY!

lol

The purpose of this thread was for one person to answer the question in the original post, and that person has repeatedly avoided answering this simple question by:

1> Pretending the original question (which is also the thread title) was too difficult to understand.

2> Pretending that the quote was a misquote.

3> Searching for tiny points of contention.

4> Starting multiple, apparently random, arguments by picking on small grammatical errors, then pretending the small errors have changed the meaning of the entire question.

5> Starting multiple, apparently random, arguments by picking on small differences in definition, then pretending the small differences in definition have changed the meaning of the entire question.

6> Answering questions, challenges and posts using strategies and tactics, rather than truth, facts and personal opinion, in a manner that is designed to keep the discussion going rather than to resolve anything.

  And now that person is accusing me of such things, such circular arguing, seemingly because I won't forget that the only purpose of this thread is for him to finish his statement, for him to tell us why we don't believe in God:

Avogadro wrote:

> while you may not beleive in a god, dont delude yourself into believing that the reason you dont beleive in a god is a result of your intelligence, IQ, education, or ability to think for yourself... <

  Pray-tell, what is the reason?

I remember when The Berzerker were touring to promote Dissimulate in 2000-2001-ish. Not only did they remember that there was a whole country outside of London, but they even decided to pay its major cities a visit.
My own little dream come true.

Uh oh, there's milk in the chocolate!

"Serpents of the Light" \m/

French metal band.

Would you rather be a black man in Adolph's Germany or Josef's Russia?

Doesn't work proprely, someone must have cut a chunk out of the code.

No one knows what drizzle is, then?