Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Active topics Unanswered topics
The forums have moved!
Click here to use the new forums. Enjoy!
Search options (Page 118 of 139)
Topics by avogadro User defined search
Posts found: 2,926 to 2,950 of 3,454
> Gladiator wrote:
EDIT: actually i felt i wanted to say more 
i want the thread to keep going but this is the thing, people vote for mccain cuz they don't like obama, like why would you do that? i just find that completely stupid!, it's like saying i'll spend my money on something stupid rather than something stupider, like why not spend it anyways? sorry for the bad example,
here is a better example. someone is going to force feed you one of two things. a steaming pile of [political byproduct] or mushrooms. now you dont really like the taste of mushrooms, but you hate that steaming pile of [political byproduct] much worse, so are you gonna vote for the mushrooms or are you going to vote for the steaming pile of [political byproduct]? you could just not vote and let the torturing decide which of the two to use, or you could pick which one is going to be less painful; and McCain is that to many people.
gladiator must be stoned or something. he thinks that because he likes Obama all Obama supporters must like him too. But the reason most people will vote for Obama over McCain is either a hate for McCain or a hate for Republicans, especially after Bush has been in office for 8 years.
technically having elections does make it democratic. but who gives a damn if its democratic? democracy is mob rule, democracy is violence and uncontrolled oppression, its what your governments tell you anarchy is.
ideally they would be separated into separate companies, ideally, my recliner, me, and the cold beer in my hand would be my own country, but ideals have no place in reality. larger countries have huge advantages that cannot be ignored. and violence among the Iraqi's wont stop just because they're separate countries or just because the americans are no longer in the streets. peacekeeping forces need to stay in the country and stabilize it. its going to take time and resources, but its the only solution to the problem.
lol, yeah, im gonna take someone's word just because he's a fellow man? wtf are you smoking Nemeara? you trust people just because they're the same sex as you?
"By the way, I hate this quoting system in the IC forums."
me too
i think that Hillary is alienating moderates with her actions, democrats will vote for Obama over McCain, he needs to get the moderates and Hillary isnt the right VP for it. i know i wont vote for him if Hillary is his VP while right now im considering it.
i figured it out! they let yell be a forum mod because he's so old, he'll die before he can do much damage.
> Wild Flower Soul wrote:
> Oh, suddenly people start posting he'd make a good fmod. Where were those comments when I was fmodded? X(
wait a sec? WFS is a fmod?!
well, good for him, he'd make a good fmod
> Black_Wing wrote:
On another note.....
When do the Democrats actually start talking about issues, and actually say something ??
I must admit, Obama is a great orator.....but, he says NOTHING. NOTHING at all.
What the hell does he stand for ?? CHANGE !!!
Just watched OBAMA speech. Unreal. Nothing said.
he's James Taggart
its good to see the democrats rip their party apart, because its only then that they can make it better.
you're only kidding yourself if you think the republicans arent doing the same thing with McCain. Republicans hate McCain, yet he's your candidate for president.
and then me and yell never gave an estimate about how often they would break their hymen before having sex. you however acted like they never have sex before breaking their hymen. cant be that uncommon, i've broken a girl's hymen and im 21, its not like when i did it was back in the day before the internet or something. maybe your girlfriend is just telling you that so you dont think she's a slut when you guys [explore the mystery of Love] and her hymen is already broken.
we have to find a way to choose randomly and ask the question in a non-biased manner, and have a large group of women to pick from.
settle what? the question is not whether women never have their hymens break before having sex for the first time, the question is how common is it. so asking 1 or 2 women wouldnt work.
you should connect a breathalyser to his computer so that before he's able to edit something, he has to blow in it to make sure he's sober enough to moderate.
but if when you say "playing rough" you mean riding a dildo, you might have a point.
breaking your hymen is often a pretty painful thing. very few mothers are going to make their daughters break it to use a tampon instead of a pad; might actually be considered abuse, i dont know.
> ☭ Fokker wrote:
> "cant be, i've been here 7 years and never lost an argument."
Yes you have, you lost at least two that I can think of. Yell however is correct as far as I can remember.
oh, very clever argument, i can say no, i havent, and then you can respond yes i have, and we get to go on like this all nigh!
wait a sec, einstein is lecturing me on denial? hows that data compression get rich scheme going for you?
cant be, i've been here 7 years and never lost an argument.
im thinking you slept with warsie
who did he have to sleep with?
fokker, i think that is a question you best ask your parents...
do your statistics include land that isnt being farmed atm because of farm rotation?
> TheYell wrote:
> "it was a tyrant forcing federalism over states rights. outlawing slavery in the rebelling states was just a way for Lincoln to cripple their economy to punish the south. He was no saint."
Actually the slave states sued to the Supreme Court to ensure that every state, whether it wanted to or not, accepted slaves as chattel property of their masters. That was the Dred Scott ruling that invalidated the Missouri Compromise of 1850
learn history. Dred Scott was the slave and was the plaintiff. and he tried to "sue" his slavemaster, not a state or all the southern states. the southern states did not have any power over the ruling. it was purely supreme court.
it says in the article
"The same clause has been used in French courts to annul marriages in which one person discovered only afterwards that the other had concealed a divorce or had a physical or mental disability that made a normal sexual life impossible."
it seems like if those lies fit in, a lie about virginity can fit in too, especially in the context of a strict Muslim community.
"lol @ avo tongue
suprised no one has said: http://www.algae-x.net/Installations/im
Posts found: 2,926 to 2,950 of 3,454