miserably!

Pompiedompiedom!

"To release their pent-up frustration and anger."

I'm not restraining from sexual activities, so I'm the one that's least frustrated!

For the rest, it sounds random sillyness. Can you rephrase your argument?

"The EU needs another Bismarck."

Someone who leads us into war wich only realisation was a moral victory against a weakened France? Somehow, I don't see how that applies to this current situation.
Bismarck's realpolitik would fail miserably nowadays. It's horribly outdated and originates from days where every country was able to fulfill it's own needs, and every country was thus far more independent than we are nowadays..

I don't know how you see it, but in case of an actual conflict against Russia, we're pretty much screwed. You might have noticed thi that having no oil or gas, usually leaves quite a strain on a military operation. We'd be cut off, our reserves would be able to get our armies going for a few weeks at most. The US wouldn't be able to supply us enough, and the oil they do supply would be extremely expensive (you can't claim that your brotherhood would stretch that far).

"Hostel is not Dutch. The movie is filmed in Slovakia."

The beginning was in Amsterdam...

And hostel's not a Tarantino film, it was only produced by him..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hostel_(film)

Indeed.

Again, that was about History

"I feel sorry for the little Paul and Alan, who it appears may not know what logic actually is"

lol! Logic would be what then? A God-inspired system?
About religious people, I have a single good advise: "Never trust a person who read only one book in his entire life, or is influenced by only one"

"Who's talking nukes? I saw level the bastards with conventional bombs.  If they wanna take it to a nuclear showdown, THEN we turn the biosphere to plasma"

I was merely pointing out that people got quite carried away and several posts appeared about nuking the russians.

"MAD = Mutually Assured Destruction is what US tries to avoid by achieving Nuclear Primacy. BTW USSR was trying to achieve the same goals too..."

I prefered the mutual agreement to destroy parts of the atomic arsenal, rather than this cold war tactic.

"as soon as NATO achieves it russia will be crushed in a nuclear blast unable to retaliate"

But why would we even want to nuke Russia to oblivion? For the love of god!! If you'd even attempt to do so, you'd spread enough fallout to destroy the rest of the world along with it...

Honeslty, I'm frightened by this gun-pulling ideas that float around here. Yes, what happened to Georgia is bad, but it's at least understandable why the Russians pulled the trick. My point of view is that their attitude shouldn't necessairily be a reason for us to start a war with them..

The world is NOT the setting of Dr. Strangelove!

"I will not be surprised if after installment of US shield in Poland with Patriot missiles added russians will follow with nuclear arsenals in Cuba and Venezuela (besides Belorussia and Kaliningrad installments)"

From  that point of view, it's a terrible pitty that the Russians sold Alaska to the Americans

Apart from thousands of casualties and even more dead citizens.

"I became a Christian due to using reasoning and logic to then propel me to using faith."

Strict logic only allows a Deist god, and even that is doubtful.

And indeed, there aren't many true believers in Belgium, and I don't mind them either. But they should accept religion's boundaries.. Those christians I know believe in creationism etc, wich really is stupidity.