2,501

(85 replies, posted in Drafting)

Would you guys like me to move this to Community? tongue

2,502

(713 replies, posted in Universal News)

You mean, with just your figs, Tobi?

2,503

(713 replies, posted in Universal News)

Luck? tongue

I think not ...I carefully chose that planet tongue - And it's the only one that was hit too tongue

Gj WS - props for fighting.  Could have done better in terms of what 05 jumped, I have no idea why people hold back reserves.  Usually first tick says a lot, and portals + shares are all too important.

But yea, best NAP war I seen in a while (even tho I'm banking).  Because besides this, so far what I've seen for a number of rounds, is one of the fams refusing to jump at all.

Ah well, was a good round and 14/96 def came out on top.

Now on to other things!!

....Does anybody know which fam Colorado is in?

2,504

(713 replies, posted in Universal News)

Poor Whiteshadow, forgot who he is warring.

Wonder if Trade has any bombers/transports left after that one.  He certainly stopped attacking us after it.

Gj Whiteshadow, you're like the Alena that never left wink

2,505

(713 replies, posted in Universal News)

Vice Leader Criminal Avangion Partaxian 309952gc 61   

Hmm, no upkeep even.

Give the guy some gc ffs.  A man needs his wizzies.

2,506

(713 replies, posted in Universal News)

Criminal Avangion      Partaxian      310986gc    61

Son, I am disappoint.

2,507

(713 replies, posted in Universal News)

Are you lovin with your muffin?

2,508

(713 replies, posted in Universal News)

You and KT still didn't tell me what that is exactly sad

2,509

(713 replies, posted in Universal News)

lol AA, I know you won't - cos deep down you know it's futile wink

Just accept your losses, and Share some of that oct with fnord, just to help introduce some random fails at least wink

2,510

(713 replies, posted in Universal News)

Vice Leader      Lucky Criminal      Camaar      89466gc    25

2,511

(713 replies, posted in Universal News)

Actually, Parrots fine - I'm more scared rizzy is lurking around somewhere yikes

2,512

(40 replies, posted in Strategy)

Probably would.  But every round we reduce the systems and fam numbers sad

I even posted the trends earlier somewhere

/me doesnt like where the trend is heading sad

2,513

(713 replies, posted in Universal News)

"i mean 05 beat off 17/10 "

lol gratz big_smile big_smile

You are the true Ic Legend yikes

/bow

2,514

(32 replies, posted in General)

#2414

Dr Pepper ftw!

2,515

(713 replies, posted in Universal News)

little?

Better start doing ur research AA wink

2,516

(713 replies, posted in Universal News)

Bite! Damn it! X(

2,517

(713 replies, posted in Universal News)

Archangel, get out of my war thread, k thx.

2,518

(254 replies, posted in General)

Erm, firstly it was Dyt - I was just trolling as well, just for some fun.

If you're that inactive where you don't even know who the players are, or who has died, maybe you shouldn't bother with playing at all...

2,519

(254 replies, posted in General)

What rules Glue?

2,520

(254 replies, posted in General)

"Im voting  DYT  for lynch , his voting makes no sense."

loooooooool

win!

/me hides from Elro

2,521

(72 replies, posted in Community)

k, im suppsed to study

but i wanna do this!

2,522

(84 replies, posted in Universal News)

lol...make sure u try at least 3 times first, k? - Incase you randomly fail twice wink

2,523

(84 replies, posted in Universal News)

lolllloll

I welcome u to try wink

The Award for Best Opper is at stake!!!

Plus, it'll be a good test of my Pop Partax idea big_smile

2,524

(40 replies, posted in Strategy)

"NAPs outside of the game's parameters are old and outdated and in my opinion is a poor strategy."


So you're complaining, essentially, that it's not good to have NAPs outside of the relations page?

I don't know - I see this as a war game.  And war warrants diplomacy.  There is so much variety when you talk about wars and who has strength over who.  If you're in a position to exert power - you do it.  Why? Because you want to win.  This may involve conditions which cannot be limited by the game (the in NAP in relations page).  Eg, cores - sectors, attacking certain areas, nap payments, area restrictions etc etc.

Bottom line is if you don't agree to a NAP made out of the game, then DONT AGREE WITH IT?  You know what I hate about IC?  Fail people making or agreeing to NAPs that they should NEVER do in the first place.  And when they agree with it, they go along with it for a while.  Then later on the track, there's a realisation process and they go "hold on, wtf ....this NAP is sooo BS its screwed and unfair".  Well, hello?  You're the one that agreed to it.

Imo, this doesn't need to be changed.  But what needs to be changed is how people use NAPs to their advantage, and don't agree to it if it's gonna screw you over.  Rather fight for what you want and need.

Learn to lead and make decisions which help your fam.

Go read up on Parrot's Leadership Workshops - 95% of people would benefit from them and automatically become better players.

2,525

(254 replies, posted in General)

I also vote Glue.