• Posts: 644

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> Chris_Balsz wrote:

> >>God help those 17 year olds who posted some half naked pics on facebook......<<

in America the teen slut who sexts her hoohaa is just a slut, but any guy with her underage hoohaa on his phone is arrested for possession of child porn

its what comes of not giving them the belt early and often, I tells ya

as to the pic, with that upper deck she is clearly not 16

_______________________________________________________________________

idd

"Swimming is a confusing sport, because sometimes you do it for fun, but other times you do it to not die"

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

27 Reply by avogadro (edited by avogadro 04-Sep-2009 20:07:13)

  • Posts: 3,454

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> Skyroshroud wrote:

> > Petrolstone wrote:

> It's a crappy advertisement anyways.

>' ". . . [the ad] could be seen to sexualise a child".'


What on earth does that mean?


To think of the child in a sexual way.


the person,  wasnt a child. she's 23.  it means that if it isnt obvious to every dumbass that an adult is an adult at a glance, then anything that can be interpreted sexually isnt allowed.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

28 Reply by East (edited by East 04-Sep-2009 20:52:07)

  • East
  • East
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,354
  • Tag points: 17

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

it's a well known and legitimate tactic in the porn industry to use models with petite bodies but are nonetheless above the age of consent; the age laws are in place to protect underaged children from abuse, not to prosecute men who fancy petite bodies (while staying away from kiddies, obviously)

in the add she's definatly trying to go for the oh I'm such an innocent little virgin look and she's hot no doubt about that. But it's still bad advertising because I'm oogeling at the woman while not paying any attention to the fleece, I would remember if the add was for a well known brand name like but I've looked at the picture several times now (hehehe) and I still don't remember the fleece producer's name or what exactly there trying to tell me other than that they have a pretty good taste in finding beautiful models but a lousy advertising company... but that doesn't mean the add should be banned or anything

qsudifhkqsdhfmsklfhjqmlsdfhjqkmsldfhjmqklsfhmqlsfhjqmsklfhqmskjdfhqsfq
sdffdgjfhjdfhgjhsfsdfqgsbsthzgflqkcgjhkgfjnbkmzghkmqrghqmskdghqkmsghnvhdf
qmkjghqmksdjqlskhqkmsdhqmskfhjqmskjdfhqkmsdfjhqmskfhjqkmsjdfhqkm
sjfhqkmsjfhqkmsjfhkqmjsfhqksdjmfhqksjfhqskjdfhnbwfjgqreutyhaerithgfqsd
kjnqsdfqsdfqsdfmkjqhgmkjnqsgkjmhzdflmghjsmdlghjsmdkghmqksdjghq

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • East
  • East
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,354
  • Tag points: 17

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

by the way can anyone link me to some that perverted stuff on amazon.jp.... thx

qsudifhkqsdhfmsklfhjqmlsdfhjqkmsldfhjmqklsfhmqlsfhjqmsklfhqmskjdfhqsfq
sdffdgjfhjdfhgjhsfsdfqgsbsthzgflqkcgjhkgfjnbkmzghkmqrghqmskdghqkmsghnvhdf
qmkjghqmksdjqlskhqkmsdhqmskfhjqmskjdfhqkmsdfjhqmskfhjqkmsjdfhqkm
sjfhqkmsjfhqkmsjfhkqmjsfhqksdjmfhqksjfhqskjdfhnbwfjgqreutyhaerithgfqsd
kjnqsdfqsdfqsdfmkjqhgmkjnqsgkjmhzdflmghjsmdlghjsmdkghmqksdjghq

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

30 Reply by Skyroshroud (edited by Skyroshroud 04-Sep-2009 22:44:43)

  • Posts: 4,235
  • Tag points: 338

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> avogadro wrote:

>the person,  wasnt a child. she's 23.  it means that if it isnt obvious to every dumbass that an adult is an adult at a glance, then anything that can be interpreted sexually isnt allowed.


I know hmm I wasn't defining the whole context of the story,

>' ". . . [the ad] could be seen to sexualise a child".'

It was just that specific sentance and what the advertising standards authority were trying to portray to get it pulled off the magazine.

Your = possessive. As in, "your grammar sucks."
You're = you are. As in, "you're an idiot for not knowing the difference."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,454

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> Skyroshroud wrote:

> > avogadro wrote:

>the person,  wasnt a child. she's 23.  it means that if it isnt obvious to every dumbass that an adult is an adult at a glance, then anything that can be interpreted sexually isnt allowed.


I know hmm I wasn't defining the whole context of the story,

>' ". . . [the ad] could be seen to sexualise a child".'

It was just that specific sentance and what the advertising standards authority were trying to portray to get it pulled off the magazine.


the advertising standards authority was saying that it doesnt matter if the person is an adult, if it isnt obvious to every dumbass that an adult is an adult at a glance, then anything that can be interpreted sexually isnt allowed.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,544
  • Tag points: 17

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

lolz smile

i just think it's a crappy add tongue

mebbe we could start another thread and make up captions tongue
i l lstart with "who will save ryan's privates?:o"

till the end of time..

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 14,366
  • Tag points: 68

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

guess they should have photoshopped the Queen's face on her

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,151
  • Tag points: 4

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

Some thoughts I had while reading through:

  I must be a paedophile; Although my g/f is 26 she has A-cups.
  People who decide what something is without checking deserve punishment for their stupidity; Like the faggot that pinched my arse in the pub the other night... Seriously, there is nothing feminine about me, I'm just a good looking guy with long hair, but half the planet thinks I'm a woman and the other half can't tell my g/f is a woman.
  Me and the bible-basher agree.
  hmm

"So, it's defeat for you, is it? Someday I must meet a similar fate..."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,263

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

Pic Pic Pic!!

Brother Simon, Keeper of Ages, Defender of Faith.
~ &#9773; Fokker

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,151
  • Tag points: 4

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

. . . of whom? (

"So, it's defeat for you, is it? Someday I must meet a similar fate..."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,544
  • Tag points: 17

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

rofl xD

*buys fokker a drink wink

till the end of time..

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 14,366
  • Tag points: 68

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

you celebrating the A-cup club?

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,544
  • Tag points: 17

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

is that you asking about my cup ?


one doenst need a specific reaon to have drinks yikes you should know that ;p

till the end of time..

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,454

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> ..Nemeara.. wrote:
;p

one doenst need a specific reaon to have drinks yikes

truer words were never spoken

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,454

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

as for the add's effectiveness. if they didnt make this add, i would of never heard of that brand before. because theres news coverage, i've heard of the brand with a relatively positive connotation in my mind if i ever see the brand in a store.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,151
  • Tag points: 4

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> ..Nemeara.. wrote:
> rofl xD
*buys fokker a drink wink



http://scienceblog.ie/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/fr-jack.jpg

"So, it's defeat for you, is it? Someday I must meet a similar fate..."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Skoe
  • Skoe
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 15

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

Her titties are out = banned


Unless you own shares in FlexFleece i honestly don't see why you are all so up
in arms... If your that desperate to see some chest you have bigger problems tongue.


And physical abuse wont stop teens from being sluts...

Morbo: Morbo can't understand his teleprompter. He forgot how you say that letter that looks like a man with a hat.
Linda: It's a 't'. It goes "tuh".
Morbo: Hello, little man. I will destroy you!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpP7b2lUxVE

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,151
  • Tag points: 4

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

...it causes them to be sluts.

"So, it's defeat for you, is it? Someday I must meet a similar fate..."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 14,366
  • Tag points: 68

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

I'm not talking sporadic abuse, I mean systematic brainwashing with heavy negative feedback

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 642

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> ...it causes them to be sluts.

Thats debatable, but i probably agree with you.

> I'm not talking sporadic abuse, I mean systematic brainwashing
> with heavy negative feedback

Yes, most sluts have daddy issues.

I am sKoE
Do you know what the chain of command is here? It's the chain I go get and beat you with to show you who's in command.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,151
  • Tag points: 4

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> Yes, most sluts have daddy issues. <

  "Hi."
  "I'm sorry sir, I don't have daddy issues."
  lol

"So, it's defeat for you, is it? Someday I must meet a similar fate..."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,461

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> thisyearsmostopen wrote:

> you can find a load of stories like this from the uk, we have some crazy laws.  if you was to draw 2 stick people on a piece of paper with a bigger one on top of a smaller one you can get locked up for 4 years........ yeah really, its all to protect the children even if they dont actually exist

its what 13 years of a socialist/feminist government does for you.

and dont even try to classify the now illegal 'extreme pornography' laws....






well.... this explains why TYMO is gay... can't see naked ladies! tongue sucks for you TYMO! Come to america! (we have strippers)

"Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds."
- J. Robert Oppenheimer

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,093
  • Tag points: 54

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

And then you realise the girl is ugly and thus has no place in our adverts.

Also, I don't care.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,454

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> Skoe wrote:

> Her titties are out = banned


Unless you own shares in FlexFleece i honestly don't see why you are all so up
in arms... If your that desperate to see some chest you have bigger problems tongue.




her titties are not out, are you blind? i have already explained in plain english why i disagree with their censorship, maybe you should read a thread before commenting on it.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points