> ☭ Fokker wrote:
> http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/

loll xD

No, you didn't actually say why you branded me so, you just came out with things about watermelons.

"you just came out with things about watermelons"

say that and he'll hound you for not getting the watermelon thing

like i said, you're a sexist and you're a disgrace to both men and women. you say "only weak men pick on women". if you weren't a sexist, you'd say "only weak people pick on other people". you're intentionally reinforcing sexual stereotypes. what's next, would you perhaps like to throw some watermelon jokes at basketball players?

now then, mr. sexist whose body hair does not grow back thicker when he cuts it. which bit was the difficult one?

Loz is the voice of clarity as usual. Well done.

Haha, Deci, did you notice I called you Justinian?

Anyway. Firstly, I'm not sexist, and the few opinions I have that may provoke the suggestion are in favour of women, (and I'm male,) so it's not a bad type of sexism. Now, that is not a sexist comment. What you mean is, you think that I'm stereotying.

Next, I'm going to point out my original point in simple terms so that it can be understood: putting "men" and "women" into a sentence instead of "people" or "humans" does not make me sexist in the slightest.

You said: "only weak people pick on other people" well, most people pick on othe people, and very often those weaker than themselves.

And, if we go right back to when I said that only weak men hit women originally, it was in response to a comment you posted. This has caused me to think that the sexism thing was  trying to cover up the fact that you are weak. Now, Decimus, a man hitting a woman would be a coward, because a woman is generally less strong than a male, indicating that only a cowardly man would pick on a woman, being a weaker target. (Again, in general.)

He favours women. It's called reproduction

If you're looking at it from the perspective of psycho-militant-backwards-thinking-feminist, yes.

"Like I said, only weak men, those weak in many ways, pick on women."

http://www.hantelparty.de/xt/female-bodybuilder.gif

I would like to see the weak man picking on this women.

"No, I'm talking about the True Gentlemen Chivilrious Type. It's seen as a pigheaded chuvanistic view  by today's 'standards'.  And before you ask why, it's because for women equal rights activists it's seen as men implying through acts like opening doors for woman or 'upholding' their honour that women are inferior and need men to do things for them and protect them from others."

Well, I apologise to such gentlemen on behalf of those women! I honestly don't understand anyone can somehow warp a small genuine act of kindess such as opening doors or carrying her bags into evil perverted chauvinism. Those polite men are the ones who really ought to be insulted, and those women clearly don't understand what real, disgusting Chauvinists are truly like.

It's depressing that people waste energy on stirring up about such petty things when there're far more pressing issues ailing our species...

> Alch wrote:

> No, I'm talking about the True Gentlemen Chivilrious Type. It's seen as a pigheaded chuvanistic view  by today's 'standards'.  And before you ask why, it's because for women equal rights activists it's seen as men implying through acts like opening doors for woman or 'upholding' their honour that women are inferior and need men to do things for them and protect them from others.

edit: I just reread what you said,  Yeah pretty much but there are still non-extreme feminists that see it this way

~ And here I am thinking that this was done because it was just generally appreciated (for instance, when I open up a door/hold it for anyone they generally give a word of appreciated and such).

Why is this joke thread looking more like politics crap?

"and it's depressing that people waste energy on things such as recycling and homeless animals while there's children dying in africa, right?"

Because if we don't go down the recycling route there won't be an Africa for those kids to die in And don't go poking me with the old children-starving-in-third-world-countries stick - have you been to Africa to build a few wells recently? No? Just sat at home on IC? Well then X( tut tut

"opposing a minor bad thing does not nullify opposing major bad things"

I did not say that. I said that you are wasting your time and intellect. So ha ha to you.