:?

Makes more sense

16. Unions should be demolished.

why?

Also Unions are also there to ensure a "fair wage".

If two people, Alice and Bob, are both working the same job and
are both getting paid the same is that fair? Yes.

If Bob was a slob and didn't as much work, had half the work ethic,
and couldn't be arsed to do the same amount of work is that fair? NO.

Take for example teachers. They kick and scream when they want more
money but oh no, just mention performance based pay and they are all
"WTF?!? H4X" on your arse.

How do you measure a teacher? With a ruler of course, although i think juding pay by penis size would be unfair to the smaller teachers and women. I sure wouldn't want my pay to be judged that way, would be torture knowing everyone had bigger cheques then me X(.

Difficult to say.

But it would be based upon the attitudes of the parents, other staff,
and - mostly - based upon an annual review.

The review would sample how much work they are putting into their
classes.

Would never work skoe, midgets fingers are much to stumpy to pass off  as a childs.

> be a hard teacher.. no matter how competent u are..
> and your rates wont be so good.

Scores mean nothing.

But in an evaluation/review the review can ask the teacher
"Okay, this student sucks -- what have you done about it?"

> sKoE )= wrote:

> I thought this might be a fun way to spend 15-20 minutes. I've gotten bored with all that lolzfail and >z0mgn00bie bullshit (mainly because that guy isnt biting anymore ).

>1. The people are the sole purpose of a country.

....uhmmm...ok....sure why not....

>2. The economy will shift and fluctuate, crash and burn,
>rise and rule supreme -- thus it is more important to protect the
>people, then to protect the economy. No economy has steadily
>been a success for thousands of years - they all fall and shift.

Virtually everything I have I bought so if the economy is poor the standard of living goes down so really protecting the economy and the people are the same thing. No government has been stable and successful for thousands of years either so I don't see what advantage there is in putting emphasis on protecting the people which I take to mean making social programs versus growing the economy and the taxes used to pay for this protection come from the economy. The fastest way to ruin an economy is to give the government control of industry.

>3. The government should ensure the people have adequate access
>to medical and educational facilities. If the government cannot ensure
>the effective management of these facilities this responsibility should
>either rest on the facility itself (independence) or a sub-set of the people
>(privitisation). Basic medical treatment should be payed by the people as
>a whole.

It's not the government that makes these social programs possible they don't just pull them out of their ass we pay for them. I don't see why I should pay my neighbors medical bills they aren't my problem and if I want to help it should be my choice and not forced on me. Especially since I don't smoke and I'm not obese but I would be paying for people who don't take care of themselves. Tax collection requires a police force so it's really the threat of and certainty that they will use force that makes me pay.

>4. The government should ensure adequate coverage of emergency
>services such as fire fighters, police, rescue services and ambulances.

The first priority of a government is to protect it citizens. But not from themselves or their own dumb decisions.

>5. GST should be absolished. Its absurd, and counter-productive.

I'm all for getting rid of taxes.

>6. The prison system should be changed such that the goal is to rehabilitate
>criminals.

Criminals are a waste of time we will get nothing out of investing in them. We have rehabilitation programs already and they fail miserably. Some people are just worthless.

>7. The death penalty is OK. There should be a mandatory time-before-death
>period to assure there are no mistakes, and only serial rapists and murderers
>should receive such a penalty. I don't believe this will influence others and reduce
>crime, i believe it'll empty out our prisons with scum that obviously has no
>regard for innocent life.

Agreed.

>8. There should be no late-term abortions.

I don't care.

>9. The Australian government should up (increase) the first home-owners grant/
>subsidy/whateveryoucall it. We have a housing shortage and the building sector
>is in a slum -- this act will help fix both in the short-medium term. This could be its
>own discussion though.

I don't care.

>10. Guns should be harder to get. No concealed weapons, and only cops should
>be allowed to carry a loaded gun anywhere except private land. Gun shops should
>be placed in the MIDDLE OF TOWNS (but away from schools) to prevent clustering of
>any sort of unwanted district.

I think this will be the new strategy of the left to get gun control around the second amendment by just making it so difficult to own a gun that the second amendment is only a technicality. Gun control has been a priority of every totalitarian government.

>11. Warning labels should be taken off everything. If i should for some reason
>purchase a coffee, it had dam well better be hot -- stating the obvious is absurd.

I have no problem with warning labels people are entitled to know what they are getting but I don't agree with lawyers and their idiot clients cashing in because some moron spilled hot coffee on his lap or thought the cruise control steers the car which is why we have a lot of these warning labels.

>12. If some bastard breaks into my house, attempts to hurt me and my family, i
>should have the right to kill him (or at least beat the shit out of him). Allowing
>criminals to sue the person they were trying to rob IS REDICULOUS.

You should be allowed to chase him down the street and bludgeon him to death with a 10 inch dildo.

>13. The Australian court system is a joke. It should be restructured or simply removed.

I don't care.

>14. Australia has no real reason to leave the commonwealth...

I don't care.

>15. Torture is a no-no -- unless a child is in *immediate* danger.

I have no sympathy for terrorists. If we need timely information to protect our troops or whoever then whatever it takes. I mean if your wife or husband or brothers or sisters were in danger would you not torture someone to get what you needed to know? Would it end the war sooner if we had better intel on the insurgents in Iraq? Sure it would and it would save lives at the expense of these worthless scumbags.

>16. Unions should be demolished.

Labor laws are adequate enough today that unions are not necessary and struggle to justify themselves.

>17. Marriage should become legally irrelevant, and instead Unions should exist.

Gays should be able to marry but I don't really care if these laws change.

>18. Nuclear power planets are OK. So is coal, although research should be
>done on how to make said processes more efficient and environmentally
>friendly.

As much as I hate to say this the French made a good choice by going nuclear. Cheap reliable power is absolutely essential to a modern economy.

>19. Israel should be wiped off the map, so to speak.

You would return Israel to the Palestinians? All they would do is kill the jews and then get back to raping goats or whatever it is they do.

>20. Pakistan should be spanked, and be forced to take actions against the various
>terrorist organisations plaguing its land and terrorizing its people.

We should put some pressure on them for this but our president is -1 spine.

>21. In a riot if police are being attacked with bottles (close range) or other serious
>weapons, they should be allowed to pull out their firearm and go *bang bang*. Rubber
>bullets, tear gas, batons and tasers are all ok for use in a violent riot. In fact, instead of
>doing all that paper work it'd probably be easier to just knee cap the bastards.

I don't care.

>I'll do another 21 later .