Re: another shooting
yeah free to do school shootings:D
great! i want my right to do school shootings here too!
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Politics → another shooting
yeah free to do school shootings:D
great! i want my right to do school shootings here too!
The big headline news about a school shooting occurred in Stuttgart.
Noobs, Stuttgart is in Gemany. How did this get to US ownership of guns? How does a school shooting in Germany have to do with US gun ownership?
Noob, this thread was made before the stuttgart shooting
i was talking about the bloodbath in alabama
10 people killed, so that prolly adds up to 80 braincells dead ![]()
the german shooting happened later
well regarding time difference i am not sure if it was the same day...
also i would be intrested in.. honest reply pleaase... did u have to google where stuttgart is?:P
the first one wasnt on school
and im pretty sure he did have to google where stuttgart is
and then the had to google what a 'germany' is
Nope. Why would I have to google a country that has cities like Hamburg? "Ich bin ein Hamburger!"
And how did I google the JFK quote so fast, hmm?
But to be honest, Stuttgart is a fort in Medieval II: Total War.
I'm glad you enjoy posting nonsense in response, Iluvatar. It's comforting to see an admission of ignorance rather than continued posting of complete garbage with no basis in reality. You post how you feel. You post how you feel the facts should fit together. You post how you feel the world should be. You post what you would like to pretend the facts are to best work in the world as you pretend it should be. Like Schniepel's last posts about "guts," ignoring the reality and facts of the situation in favor of what he reasons OUGHT to be the facts and reality.
I respect anyone who posts honestly and clearly. I respect many who disagree with me because they state clearly where they stand and what has led them to hold the positions that they hold. But posting how you feel things should be and statistics which do NOT support one's claims is just dishonest and juvenile. "Gun deaths went down after X regulation!" without mention of "violent crime more than doubled during the same period!" is not scholarship nor analysis; it's bad PR. So regulating guns has an impact on how often they are used in crime. Does it reduce crime? Does it reduce murder? These are the real questions. If you manage to reduce crimes in which guns are an instrument of murder while increasing crimes and crimes which involve other instruments used for murder you haven't accomplished anything but the opposite of your claimed intention. The enemy isn't "gun crime" and "gun murder," it's CRIME and MURDER.
"You post how you feel the world should be. You post what you would like to pretend the facts are to best work in the world as you pretend it should be. Like Schniepel's last posts about "guts," ignoring the reality and facts of the situation in favor of what he reasons OUGHT to be the facts and reality."
Im sorry, but how is this any diffirent from what you are doing?
and its oki, i know your responce will prove me right ![]()
I did not even address your juvenile incest comment. I'm not on your level and I'm not lowering myself to it. I can understand how it makes you angry that the facts do not support your position. But that's not the healthy response to holding a position not based in reality. Perhaps you should reevaluate your position rather than posting random insults toward a stranger on a forum?
Despite our guns and car accidents, Americans still have a life expectancy up to Western standards. Why bother with the trouble of removing guns completely? It would cost money and hurt the economy.
no random insults fancsali
When i see a retard, i just call it retard. No need to beat around the bush ![]()
> Schniepel wrote:
> Actually i hope the "Ich bin ein Hamburger" was a joke ![]()
Nein. Es war nicht ein witz
well thats sad then:P
JFK was a different kind of food :S
> Schniepel wrote:
> well thats sad then:P
JFK was a different kind of food :S>
lol
he was this
http://img321.imageshack.us/img321/1749/berliner28mt.jpg
and not this
http://www.starcookers.de/uploads/recipes/img_dishes/142x113/Hamburger_shutterstock-scaliert.jpg
Pastry, quite similar to doughnut pastry, covered with sugar, filled with strawberry jelly. It's awesome.
I thought the idea that JFK said he was a jelly doughnut was an American hoax
I told that joke to wanderjahr coeds and they didn't get it
Or maybe they were pretending not to
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Pjn5E6yOKo
he did not just say it.. he also said he is proude to be that! ![]()
Ok, so he should have said "Ich bin Berliner," and not included the "ein."
You Germans have the most complicated language. Other times you say sentences like "I am outside going." Or in the JFK case, he would have said "I am Berliner," if he got it right.
"I am outside going?" for "i am going out"? that would be "I go outside"
JFK used propper correct grammar. the only pitty for him was that that pastry is called berliner...in any other city (besides hamburg) it wouldnt have been any fun at all:)
To avoid that he could have said "I am Berliner" which is the "Ich bin Berliner" u mentioned.
Imperial Forum → Politics → another shooting
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.