> Orbit wrote:
> I pnapped 52 at the start of the round. they were small and their leader was polite.
I didn't rape 30 because of rain, i didnt nap them because of rain. I raped 30 because at the first sign of conflict they started getting abusive and deleting.
If you are to avoid conflict with a big fam Naci, u negotiate. So i gave danny the chance to take a nap, he refused.. that was his choice not mine.
Olg gregg, its not about whether he would break the nap or not, it's the principle of it. If IC death randomed into my fam, after 48 hrs he'd be gone. he makes me look bad, and makes my family look bad. i wouldnt expect any family to nap me if he was there. nor should you with rain. You know he broke a nap, you didn't remove him, which is fine. Bur dont expect me to have the same opinion as you.
----
didn't attack because of rain? thats not what i saw. i have seen the messages orbit so you can't lie. i understand killing ic death. i would kill ic death, arganon or artic if they joined one of my fams. but i know rain and i know that he is not dishonourable. and you have to admit not napping a fam under half your size is always going to ruin their round. the nap offer u made was after people had deleted.
im not saying you shouldn't attack small fams. i am saying you shouldn't refuse to nap a fam because of one player, who isn't leader. i don't trust people who have broken a nap but i would still nap their fam as long as they weren't leader.
"Birthdays are good for you. Statistics show that the people who have the most of them live the longest."