• Posts: 6,052
  • Tag points: 69

Re: 587 vs 576

I know im teh best tongue

True LEGEND

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 508
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 587 vs 576

LoL, pathetic. That's all I have to say.

Everything to gain

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 782

Re: 587 vs 576

hmmm i was never informed of any of these msgs or that talk... but we never did sign a nap...

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,052
  • Tag points: 69

Re: 587 vs 576

Mmm all bit fuzzy to me but im not in this war so im not judging big_smile

True LEGEND

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 131
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 587 vs 576

576 DOWN over 250 planets.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 131
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 587 vs 576

LOL
That would be interesting to see.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,052
  • Tag points: 69

Re: 587 vs 576

wow then you guys really have loads of planets tongue

True LEGEND

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,743
  • Tag points: 85

Re: 587 vs 576

i dont see what the problem is. imperial conflict is a game of war.

no nap was ever official, if any1 wants to bring out an official nap signed by both leaders, please masse continue to complain about it.

<KT|Away> I am the Trump of IC

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,743
  • Tag points: 85

Re: 587 vs 576

This just in.
590 may be becoming involved. Thus far it has been retakes, but will 576 feel threatened enuff to turn this into a 2v1!?!?!?!?!

<KT|Away> I am the Trump of IC

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

35 Reply by ThisYearsMostOpen

  • ThisYearsMostOpen
  • Guest
  • Tag points: 76

Re: 587 vs 576

whats the real deal on this ?  i told 87 id stop hitting them but if they did dirty like our ex ally did on 76 i will think again


someone give the truth ?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,743
  • Tag points: 85

Re: 587 vs 576

the truth is, nap talks were in discussion. broker held back and wouldnt sign. this combined with the rumors that 87 were receiving led artic and the rest of us to feel that either
1. broker was just holding back and we would get our nap....eventually
2. broker was holding back because 76 wanted to hit us

personally, after seeing the beating 76 put on 93, i didnt want to see what they could do to us if it was on their terms.

Masse i knew nothing about the conversation u continuously quote up there, but it doesnt change a thing. all the evidence led to too many possiblities, that we didnt like so we did what we thought was the smart thing and struck when it was still on our terms.

to finish this off

THERE WAS NO OFFICIAL NAP, THEREFORE NO NAP WAS BROKEN
and that my friends, is the fault of 76

<KT|Away> I am the Trump of IC

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,743
  • Tag points: 85

Re: 587 vs 576

there was no whining there:) in theory by making it a 2v1 it would in fact be 576 doing the whining.

they cant take care of there own shit----they call their friends:)

<KT|Away> I am the Trump of IC

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,743
  • Tag points: 85

Re: 587 vs 576

u got a great start on it

<KT|Away> I am the Trump of IC

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,743
  • Tag points: 85

Re: 587 vs 576

u keep talking about this pnap, but can come up with no nap officially signed by both leaders...hmmmm

<KT|Away> I am the Trump of IC

0 Dislike 0 Post Points