• Posts: 663

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

@ pitbull explaining me why the conflict started.

that's exactly what I meant with blaming each other.

you say we fig ran first but you gusys started attacking in systems we could possibly lose a lot of infra if you persisted. so we cleared an attacker out of their;

how do you clear an attacker with portal out of a system? you sab/ff it with the risk of them retaliating severe in the 12 ticks they have left.

or you just attack the planet and hope the attacker stations his fig( which is pretty logical if you have portalled shares with no nap fam and start taking a few planets.

your attacker hadn't stationed his figs, we had no attacker that could take the planet in 1 blow so only option left is figrunning.


so yes we're both to blame for who started it. we fig ran and you got pissed because your attacker had forgotten to station his figs.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 883
  • Tag points: 1

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

stfu

[color=00BFFF]"Four things do not come back - the spent arrow, the spoken word, time passed, and the neglected opportunity"[/color]

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,537
  • Tag points: 7

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

and i would agree on 125 planets witch has been offered hell i might eaven add those 3 moral's but NO WAY IN HELL i can do that in 4 day's

thats just us raizing our own infra instead of you doing it for us it will only save your fam time and effort thats not how i see a nap

we have to get some time to gather them so 6 day's should be fair

all it seems is excuses to be able to finish us..

and yeah we where top 5 coulse some rediculous infra jump we did but we where top 20 just 2 day's b4 that and where only top 5 for 1 day b4 we got into this fight ..

we where a top 20 fam with attitute not a big top 5 fam who could war everyone and victoriously wank off at the end tongue

so plz just get us 6 day's and we will add the moral's if not we might aswhell fight ourselfves to death or somethign

Dutch bastard

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 569

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

gotmilk...




You and I are going to have to be more in sync. It's remarks like those that keep such buggers as '81 (no offence :-)) on our backs!

Jesus Christ. We were just starting to calm down.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,040
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

All i can say is you guys are a joke,why do you play a war game and complain about getting attacked, Ive watched you guys progress from day one and planned on attacking you when the time was right, I have no hard feelings against anyone in your fam and Tommie i'm not blaming you i'm blaming me.

I LOVE ATTACKING. smile

Pitbull(Humanoid - Once a Force scholar and teacher, turned Warlord. Vain, he believes he is the best fighter alive.
A warlord is a person with power who has both military and civil[1] control over a subnational area due to armed forces loyal to the warlord and not to a central authority.  And has the means and authority to engage in war

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 609

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

Yes Pitbull, Uni knows that you justify your acts by stressing the "war" in "war game". Regular people like to stress "game" tho. Try to understand that, and just maybe try to respect that.

It's a game, so everybody should have fun. In a war, only the winners have fun.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

132 Reply by Pitbull (edited by Pitbull 25-Jan-2009 16:10:49)

  • Posts: 3,040
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

Yes Lipton i'm having a ton of fun, always have a ton of fun thats why ive played for the last 6 years bottom fams top fams played in them all, when the fun stops ill stop, somebody has to win.

Pitbull(Humanoid - Once a Force scholar and teacher, turned Warlord. Vain, he believes he is the best fighter alive.
A warlord is a person with power who has both military and civil[1] control over a subnational area due to armed forces loyal to the warlord and not to a central authority.  And has the means and authority to engage in war

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 663

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

> Pitbull wrote:

> Yes Lipton i'm having a ton of fun, always have a ton of fun thats why ive played for the last 6 years bottom fams top fams played in them all, when the fun stops ill stop, somebody has to win.


boy wish I'd had gone attacker this round. we might actually had a good time for a while.


btw you kinda changed your story the last few pages didn't you:

we weren't planning on attacking you we were going to atttack another fam.

now:
I was sure i was gonna attack you guys from day 1.


look 125 planets is nice for me but 4 days is not enough.

we either need to give less planets or have a few more days. which is not as unreasonable as it sounds.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

134 Reply by Pitbull (edited by Pitbull 25-Jan-2009 17:17:28)

  • Posts: 3,040
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

I never said i was not going to attack you,if i had that mentality i would not be a attacker, in my eyes everyone is a target.

Pitbull(Humanoid - Once a Force scholar and teacher, turned Warlord. Vain, he believes he is the best fighter alive.
A warlord is a person with power who has both military and civil[1] control over a subnational area due to armed forces loyal to the warlord and not to a central authority.  And has the means and authority to engage in war

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

135 Reply by PP_

  • PP_
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 694
  • Tag points: 124

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

This is what it comes down to.

its a war game and in war u win and lose. Atm were beating u and big time. U offered us 4% of your planets and leader said no.

Our leader in return asked for 13% of your planets and u said no.

In a nap cancelation war u be losing 25-35% of your planets. Fams like ours usually take 20-25% tops as we dont rape people, but others like cartel led fams will take 30-35% as they farm people and think its part of the game.

So why is it so bad and so dishonorable in tick wars to ask for 13% of your planets when your losing??

opps are part of the game, so get use to it and trying to threaten us with snailsex going rogue wont work.

In anycase I dont care at all about much anymore. U guys want this to stop bad cause u been sending msgs non stop+ maken it known in here, so if u want this to stop then I'd highly recomend u caugh up alot more then you want, otherwise we continue till we get them by force and it dont matter if your down to 20th rank.

At this point who cares why the conflict started?? When u fig ran 1 of our inactive attackers and hit the other that started it and now we will finish it.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

136 Reply by Lee (edited by Gwynedd 27-Jan-2009 11:22:32)

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

why bring my name into it, do u think of me that much tongue
i stuck up for ur fam, and whats the difference between u taking 25% of a fams planets when at war and another fam wanting more than 30% when they go to war.
u dont war a fam to let them live! u war them to kill them its as simple as that, this games turning [w00f!]

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 883
  • Tag points: 1

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

Correction Pp

Genesis Fams Lose 85-95%

[color=00BFFF]"Four things do not come back - the spent arrow, the spoken word, time passed, and the neglected opportunity"[/color]

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

138 Reply by PP_ (edited by Gwynedd 27-Jan-2009 11:22:17)

  • PP_
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 694
  • Tag points: 124

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

tongue [w00f!] I agree ic should be called atm.

2 rounds ago people were in cores hanging out bored and complaining of no action. Last round we came and naped no one till we beat them minus dimpels fam who we beat at eor. Every fam was a target for us from 1st to last and more often then not the top fams whined non stop. We were called all kinds of names and yet all we did was refuse all naps:P.

This round all i see is pnaping non stop and alot of farming on smaller fams. We cant touch a fam without someone offering or demanding a pnap.

Cartel I dont hate u personally or anything. I just dont agree with or like how u play. U think farming is normal and part of ic and u farm fams while u pnap and nap top fams.

It be nice if in any war there was a max # of planets that u could take from a fam cause 30-35% is too much. All too often people will delete or go inactive when that happens...

In anycase good day

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 663

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

read the message more closely: 125 planets in 4 days we can't manage. we need more time.

all these terms say is you laughing at us and not taking the whole nap thing serious.

your terms are:
125 planets( 3 morale)
4 days
not in systems with a whole lot of 76 where they can just take them from you.

since our earlier conflict with 76 they are all over our core so the last term is already dificult and forces us to explore in far away systems for which we need more time.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

140 Reply by PP_

  • PP_
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 694
  • Tag points: 124

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

tommie because its only 1 or 2 people from your fam that are pathetic ill hold off on my nuking If u guys agree to whatever the leader asks.

125 planets is not evan 10%, I'd be happy if i were u guys

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

141 Reply by Lee

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

i dont farm small fams at all ive been quite nice to smal fams actualllly tongue

i do think farming is part of the game, but i dont call it farming i call it getting pwned mate.

and as for naps with top fams i napped 2 fams at start of round and they was startegic naps that paid off as now im fighting 88 and wothout those naps after war my fam would be screwed and just to add it wasnt my fam it was Noirs i hate leading i suck at leading but at least i can admit that tongue

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 663

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

> PP_ wrote:

> tommie because its only 1 or 2 people from your fam that are pathetic ill hold off on my nuking If u guys agree to whatever the leader asks.

125 planets is not evan 10%, I'd be happy if i were u guys


yeah problem is we can't get them in 4 days. that's virtually impossible

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 469

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

u already have more than 125 planets, whats the problem.

~DuKeY~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 569

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

There is no other problem than the simple fact that some guys just want to complain.

NAP signed.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,537
  • Tag points: 7

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

smile
whell by whining enoth i did get the nap down from 200 to 125 planets

would be stupid not to try

Dutch bastard

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 733

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

Thats because 200 was intentionally unreasonable. tongue

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 569

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

WindowsME:

You are generally unreasonable ;-)

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 733

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

we're pretending to be flying through star systems and have people that produce a child every 25 weeks (although that counts the whole population, if it's just the women making children, it's every 12 weeks) - who needs reason?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 569

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

Good point.

*Dons my cape and wizard hat...*

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 865

Re: 1581 SUPER FAM ... or super losers?

you're not counting twins and higher order multiples, winME hmm

I'm on fire!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points