Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 47 ~
next round i will be camaar x) killing everyone xD
and we are still getting attackt by 3 fams...
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 47 ~
next round i will be camaar x) killing everyone xD
and we are still getting attackt by 3 fams...
You Reap What You Sow Dude.
And yeah I cant wait till the next round too.... ![]()
I just hope everyone stays where they reshuffle to
Hoon had the chance to clear me as I posted a few threads back but only got me out of 1 system
I warned pw I had fleet now and was going to use it ![]()
Looks like Ho0on may have Fallen on his Own Sword anyway ![]()
he hasn't been online -_- else you would notice
sucks having inactive attackers eh?
PvC soon?
no
I've got most of one done, but will hold it till EoR.
iluvatar why you posting in here if your not in pw, and if you are hear where are you hiding ![]()
Pixies, why are you saving it till end of round? Then the round is over there won't be pretenders or contenders there will just be 1 winner and 19 losers.
At least with 1 week left we can try to prove you wrong in your predictions
![]()
Just waiting it out on the sidelines till start of new round Maxi ![]()
lol, cant keep away either? ![]()
1 KISS me (1603) 1936 26084756 152966
This family is all that
Everyone else is dust in the wind
Does my PVC suffice?
there was a time taking 50% of a fam's planets was frowned upon... times seem to have changed tho.
indeed, leaders sending messages about napping, and attacking whole day for 400 planets
tryme we raided midnights fam way harder eor 2 rounds ago...we won that round, what my fams trying to do right now alright.
its eor stop being such wusses we set up got in, got in closer so why would we just stop all of a sudden.
cause you are one of the reasons why people quit this game?
> stevy wrote:
> indeed, leaders sending messages about napping, and attacking whole day for 400 planets
Eh, til the nap or CF is signed, the fight is still on. Yes, my ldr sent msgs about a nap, yes talks were in progress. BUT, nothing was finalized til this tick.
Until there is a nap or CF in place, atks continue.
Indeed. Its still fair game until NAP is signed or a CF is put in place.
> Tryme wrote:
> there was a time taking 50% of a fam's planets was frowned upon... times seem to have changed tho.
Eh, that all depends on the fam losing the planets. I think 10% is the norm. But exceptions can be made.
Farmers, vultures, etc. Some folks need spanked.
I see no hard and fast rule about this, just convention. Just an informal agreement, and the idea of fairplay and sportsmanship.
you shouldnt have to justify to everyone why we took lots of planets, seeing as that is the way people win in this game. We did not farm, we did not vulture...we picked a fam that was close to our size, in top 5 , and we made war. we were succesful. with each fam having close to 1600 planets to start with, you think we are only going to take 100 planets and then call it qiuts? i guess youd rather have us farm smaller fams to win?
i would like to throw out a kudos to "darkness" , his defense was too good , and all our attackers had to abandon HIS initial raid. Kudos lol, show bankers how its done.
yeah....uh they were bigger than us to begin with... and since they infrawhored and didnt bother with defenses its our fault that they got what they deserved from a well planned raid? not to mention there were several experienced players in that family who obviously just didnt care... because, uh, not many retakes took place by them at all.... are we supposed to send them a message a day before hand saying "hey, we are about to raid your family... hope you have good defenses because we will start in 24 hours."? What next, send them a list of planets you plan on raiding? How about you do better next round and stop complaining because a family worked harder and ravaged your fam.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 47 ~
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.