Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

well its on now, we are going to keep hitting them till the end of round... so i guess we go down together.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

Week 49, 12
10 Cyborg Sith Inc. (1058) 924 5977917 67077
11 Capricorns Uncharted Territory (1063) 1466 7179480 66295
12 ~癗oThiNg_GoiNg_On皛 (1070) 1235 7169358 65431
13 Wrath of TTA (1082) 878 7265556 62197
14 DeAtH SqUaD (1101) 1408 6895826 62155
15 Tamed (hard to be leader!) (1089) 1108 9087625 61067
16 -=SpIdeRs=- (1092) 1315 9274433 58951

the round is won on points these days, and you guys are not winning any points LOL.

Signed, BC Cougar of Darth Fangclaw (1058)



lol..,wad a childish idiot=P

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

lol... thing is i dont care about any of it tongue

points or no points ... bah X(

I am back... back again... for while that is big_smile

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

yeah, and then the eor jumping comes along

spiders jump agents because they have the ressies to do so
spiders destroy cougars cash

we have another uni thread because he "swore" that there was a NAP

<><I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every moment of it><>
                                 <><TRI FOR LIFE!><>
                              <><deaths vengeance><>

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

big_smile

PP sums it up real nicely - you knew our families agreed to a NAP - when we needed, we cleared you away from our systems easily - after the discussion between the leaders you were left alone, allowed to portal up and share systems etc. - meaning our whole family believed theres a NAP (or you have some other interesting theory of how you managed to use your great skill to portal up in our core area? big_smile )

That being said I must also agree a little bit with the opposing side - NAPS are usually signed and forwarded between the leaders.

Cougar is by far one of the hardest people to communicate with that i have come across playing this great game and I see how a misunderstanding and a terrible mess is always possible when our dear leader is involved in the game big_smile

But yeah as PP pointed out - your first posts sums it up

You knew we think we have a NAP - you use all the advantages and cover it provided to you - (basically at this point you are agreeing theres a NAP cause you are using it) and once it was suitable you said screw the dummies, they never signed the NAP in the official way big_smile

anyway lets see what we can do in our bad situation wink

******Smoke more - Spend less******

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

some times i am nice in the way i accept someones word.... and they abusively use it against me... but i also never forget.
so from now on Colorado as a leader means that you can't make naps with any family i am in, and that you can almost guarantee that we will be farming you because you will never sneak up on any family i am in again.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

lol cougar lucky i have u sign it

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

with most, that are honest, and honorable, it only takes a yes.
when i find different, that means they are the scourge of this game..... and i will fight them till they leave, or learn better.
that is the BC credo... just like we fight, we will to the last of us try to save this game from... the nap breakers, and dishonorable... to the last.... or till they realise that diplomacy is a part of war, and your reputation will proceed you as to how you honor it.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

but cougar, you had nothing to back your statement. u knew how naps in IC are signed, u gotta haf the nap terms set out, there wasnt even a timeline of how long the nap is, whether its 24hr 48hr or 72hr. there was no signing between u and colo and i really cant see why we haf a nap if something that basic isnt in place.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

NO, now you know how naps are signed.
i have done this with countless families, this simple, and only arctic and you guys every done it this way... so in my eyes everyone of you but killamahire are targets till you apologize or get sick of playing this game.
trust me.... we wont miss you.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

lol...i haf been arnd for 8 years and i haf nv signed a nap like how u do. so wad kinda nap do we haf with u in YOUR eyes?1min?1hr?24hr?48hr?72hr?perm?

87 (edited by Rotweiler (EST) 08-Sep-2008 13:44:08)

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

Zidi you make very many statements and I honestly can't say any of them are false big_smile

Undeath was being pretty reasonable about the situation aswell

Colorado on the other hands made threats, acted like a big bully - only because he was handed this chance on a platter to kill our family by cougar and his uncorrect paperwork - like I said when it was needed we cleared the entire 92 in half a day from our area - now under this false NAP or whatever we call it you snuck back in big_smile and kicked our asses - I still wouldnt be so happy and pompous if i was a little cheating dong like Colorado big_smile

But i dont cry even if my planets are taken and eco is ruined - thats the essence of this game what its all about - and experience shows me that the sort of little cheaters and loophole finders get a new a hole made for them before the round is over anyway - this war will make you planet fat and your gameplay is maybe 6.5 points on a 10 point scale (my entire family would maybe make it to 4 points on that scale) So yeah unless your allies will protect you you will be taken down anyways wink

C you in hell boys big_smile

******Smoke more - Spend less******

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

to specify why i gave 4 points to my family - thats 1 point for Kama, 1 point for Hazard - 1 point selfishly for me and 1 point for the rest of the players (who are just being held back by cougar and his out of this world fantasies)

******Smoke more - Spend less******

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

the fact is i said yes colorado said yes, and for honorable people that is all that is needed.
and if you have been here 8 years, then you know the nap backwards and forwards... and that is all it takes.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

so is it 24hrs?48hrs?72hrs?or perm?

u still havent answered that yet=P

and if both said yes, then where are the terms?

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

the terms were set as same as our allies (meaning 1098)

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

I really don't see whats so hard about getting a nap signed and having it be official by having it show up on the relations page. Then you wouldn't run into these types of problems and trust wouldn't be an issue.

One thing that would be nice on the relations page is a 24hr, 48hr and 72hr nap option along with a pnap option, if theres side agreements that are made like staying out of each others core and there broken you could drop the nap and fight it out either 24hrs, 48hrs or 72hrs later depending on nap length. sounds simple to me and it would guarantee  that no family would have more naps then what the particular game allows.

✞✝✞ Șώεετ ɖરεᎯɱȘ ✞✝✞

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

Zidi! dont blaim me:P

i had no idea we had even spoken about a nap with 1058 until cougar told me we had a nap about 6 ticks before we had planned on hittin them. imagine my surprise when i get a random message from him saying "we have a nap", when i havent seen a single thing about it all round.

<KT|Away> I am the Trump of IC

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

> BC Cougar wrote:

> the fact is i said yes colorado said yes, and for honorable people that is all that is needed.
and if you have been here 8 years, then you know the nap backwards and forwards... and that is all it takes.


if you've been here 8 years you should be smart enough to poke the other leader until it is totally settled. to be here that long and have something like this happen to you shows how experience doesnt mean that you learn anything

<KT|Away> I am the Trump of IC

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

cougar

we dont have a nap never sighned

stop being so stupid and stop sending me those private messages  ingame

if you send me 1 then a a normal 1  and i will answer

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

soz to bring this fairly old thread back to life, but some people our pouting about "honor", and its getting pretty damn funny, I can see the honor in complaining about it on uni.

I feel sorry for cougars fam, if you have a leader who is hell bent on wasting everything you guys have on attaking a fam that is severly larger then you, and by provoking that fam continuously I would seriously consider changing leaders, or take matters into your own hands and create some kind of agreement, I've played with colo before and he wouldn't destroy you guys utterly if you suggest something that is reasonable in your situation

(iow I want this to keep going lol)

<><I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every moment of it><>
                                 <><TRI FOR LIFE!><>
                              <><deaths vengeance><>

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

we did change leaders, but to late i'm afraid.. With the fallback in ranks, the activity felt back to. to bad..

At least rotweiler could arrange peace with 92-98.. If not we would be top 50 smile the situation was hopeless.. So i'm glad 92-98 didn't kill us off smile they've got my respect for that..

peace