Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!
well its on now, we are going to keep hitting them till the end of round... so i guess we go down together.
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!
well its on now, we are going to keep hitting them till the end of round... so i guess we go down together.
Week 49, 12
10 Cyborg Sith Inc. (1058) 924 5977917 67077
11 Capricorns Uncharted Territory (1063) 1466 7179480 66295
12 ~癗oThiNg_GoiNg_On皛 (1070) 1235 7169358 65431
13 Wrath of TTA (1082) 878 7265556 62197
14 DeAtH SqUaD (1101) 1408 6895826 62155
15 Tamed (hard to be leader!) (1089) 1108 9087625 61067
16 -=SpIdeRs=- (1092) 1315 9274433 58951
the round is won on points these days, and you guys are not winning any points LOL.
Signed, BC Cougar of Darth Fangclaw (1058)
lol..,wad a childish idiot=P
lol... thing is i dont care about any of it ![]()
points or no points ... bah X(
yeah, and then the eor jumping comes along
spiders jump agents because they have the ressies to do so
spiders destroy cougars cash
we have another uni thread because he "swore" that there was a NAP
PP sums it up real nicely - you knew our families agreed to a NAP - when we needed, we cleared you away from our systems easily - after the discussion between the leaders you were left alone, allowed to portal up and share systems etc. - meaning our whole family believed theres a NAP (or you have some other interesting theory of how you managed to use your great skill to portal up in our core area?
)
That being said I must also agree a little bit with the opposing side - NAPS are usually signed and forwarded between the leaders.
Cougar is by far one of the hardest people to communicate with that i have come across playing this great game and I see how a misunderstanding and a terrible mess is always possible when our dear leader is involved in the game ![]()
But yeah as PP pointed out - your first posts sums it up
You knew we think we have a NAP - you use all the advantages and cover it provided to you - (basically at this point you are agreeing theres a NAP cause you are using it) and once it was suitable you said screw the dummies, they never signed the NAP in the official way ![]()
anyway lets see what we can do in our bad situation ![]()
some times i am nice in the way i accept someones word.... and they abusively use it against me... but i also never forget.
so from now on Colorado as a leader means that you can't make naps with any family i am in, and that you can almost guarantee that we will be farming you because you will never sneak up on any family i am in again.
with most, that are honest, and honorable, it only takes a yes.
when i find different, that means they are the scourge of this game..... and i will fight them till they leave, or learn better.
that is the BC credo... just like we fight, we will to the last of us try to save this game from... the nap breakers, and dishonorable... to the last.... or till they realise that diplomacy is a part of war, and your reputation will proceed you as to how you honor it.
but cougar, you had nothing to back your statement. u knew how naps in IC are signed, u gotta haf the nap terms set out, there wasnt even a timeline of how long the nap is, whether its 24hr 48hr or 72hr. there was no signing between u and colo and i really cant see why we haf a nap if something that basic isnt in place.
NO, now you know how naps are signed.
i have done this with countless families, this simple, and only arctic and you guys every done it this way... so in my eyes everyone of you but killamahire are targets till you apologize or get sick of playing this game.
trust me.... we wont miss you.
lol...i haf been arnd for 8 years and i haf nv signed a nap like how u do. so wad kinda nap do we haf with u in YOUR eyes?1min?1hr?24hr?48hr?72hr?perm?
Zidi you make very many statements and I honestly can't say any of them are false ![]()
Undeath was being pretty reasonable about the situation aswell
Colorado on the other hands made threats, acted like a big bully - only because he was handed this chance on a platter to kill our family by cougar and his uncorrect paperwork - like I said when it was needed we cleared the entire 92 in half a day from our area - now under this false NAP or whatever we call it you snuck back in
and kicked our asses - I still wouldnt be so happy and pompous if i was a little cheating dong like Colorado
But i dont cry even if my planets are taken and eco is ruined - thats the essence of this game what its all about - and experience shows me that the sort of little cheaters and loophole finders get a new a hole made for them before the round is over anyway - this war will make you planet fat and your gameplay is maybe 6.5 points on a 10 point scale (my entire family would maybe make it to 4 points on that scale) So yeah unless your allies will protect you you will be taken down anyways ![]()
C you in hell boys ![]()
to specify why i gave 4 points to my family - thats 1 point for Kama, 1 point for Hazard - 1 point selfishly for me and 1 point for the rest of the players (who are just being held back by cougar and his out of this world fantasies)
the fact is i said yes colorado said yes, and for honorable people that is all that is needed.
and if you have been here 8 years, then you know the nap backwards and forwards... and that is all it takes.
so is it 24hrs?48hrs?72hrs?or perm?
u still havent answered that yet=P
and if both said yes, then where are the terms?
the terms were set as same as our allies (meaning 1098)
I really don't see whats so hard about getting a nap signed and having it be official by having it show up on the relations page. Then you wouldn't run into these types of problems and trust wouldn't be an issue.
One thing that would be nice on the relations page is a 24hr, 48hr and 72hr nap option along with a pnap option, if theres side agreements that are made like staying out of each others core and there broken you could drop the nap and fight it out either 24hrs, 48hrs or 72hrs later depending on nap length. sounds simple to me and it would guarantee that no family would have more naps then what the particular game allows.
Zidi! dont blaim me:P
i had no idea we had even spoken about a nap with 1058 until cougar told me we had a nap about 6 ticks before we had planned on hittin them. imagine my surprise when i get a random message from him saying "we have a nap", when i havent seen a single thing about it all round.
> BC Cougar wrote:
> the fact is i said yes colorado said yes, and for honorable people that is all that is needed.
and if you have been here 8 years, then you know the nap backwards and forwards... and that is all it takes.
if you've been here 8 years you should be smart enough to poke the other leader until it is totally settled. to be here that long and have something like this happen to you shows how experience doesnt mean that you learn anything
cougar
we dont have a nap never sighned
stop being so stupid and stop sending me those private messages ingame
if you send me 1 then a a normal 1 and i will answer
soz to bring this fairly old thread back to life, but some people our pouting about "honor", and its getting pretty damn funny, I can see the honor in complaining about it on uni.
I feel sorry for cougars fam, if you have a leader who is hell bent on wasting everything you guys have on attaking a fam that is severly larger then you, and by provoking that fam continuously I would seriously consider changing leaders, or take matters into your own hands and create some kind of agreement, I've played with colo before and he wouldn't destroy you guys utterly if you suggest something that is reasonable in your situation
(iow I want this to keep going lol)
we did change leaders, but to late i'm afraid.. With the fallback in ranks, the activity felt back to. to bad..
At least rotweiler could arrange peace with 92-98.. If not we would be top 50
the situation was hopeless.. So i'm glad 92-98 didn't kill us off
they've got my respect for that..
peace
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.