Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

the fact is you picked the wrong person for a huckleberry colorado.
and no matter how much you change your name to post different backings of you.
the people in the game know it all.
it takes a few months to build a reputation, but a few years to gain it back.

52 (edited by windowsME 06-Sep-2008 06:38:47)

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

A) "i offer NAP"
B) "NAP accepted"


That's a NAP 1092, I don't even log in,and i'm certainly not involved, nor do I even like BC cougar :-p but you know exactly what that was.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

honor is honor, period... it isn't a matter of like, or dislike.
even if you like someone, then you should fight them honorably to get your respect.
and this is... after all, a game, so enjoy it, and know that when you make an agreement, that it stands, so you can know your battlefield.
without people being shit suckers.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

The fact is that i think Cougar is a bit retarded to be honest, i do know my allies offered you guys a nap, and i know noone replied, so what were they supposed to do?

just stop whining and fight smile

Haters gonna hate!

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

Week 25, 11

48 hr NAP between xxxx and xxxx.

Standard rules, no bullshit.




Signed and agreed,colorado  of xxxx
signed and agreed, BC Cougar of xxxx

nap should be sign like this lol.than only consider valid.that my opinon

56 (edited by Gwynedd 06-Sep-2008 11:44:28)

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

LOL that message doesnt say shit. colorado accepts to get a nap with your family but you never sended the terms and rules for that nap. which nap you have, a perm, a 24h, 48hr,72hr??? and none of the 2 families here signed something. you just [no masking] up cougar, once again this round.

Fremen Forever!

1       M00lar Ftw (1431)       5165pl      129971306nw

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

Exactly big_smile

your`re just whining like a little bitch big_smile

Haters gonna hate!

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

i didnt want to say anything on this matter since im quite inactive=P

but yeah cougar.i dun see any proper nap terms and all...a nap shud be signed how melvin put it in the post above.

and yeah. it shud also be sent to the vls of the family

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

hahha omfg 1092 and 1058 is ally hahahaha.which side i should vultures.....

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

still Cougar  is craying as a little baby big_smile
he cant win this and he lies that there was a nap
never see sign colo one
im vl and i need a message then when there was never have never saw something in oure forum and never hear it from any in my fam
so Cougar stop wining and fight dont cry like a little baby
show youre balls and fight

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

melvin
    Player

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

hahha omfg 1092 and 1058 is ally hahahaha.which side i should vultures.....



Melvin you seem a bit retarded

Haters gonna hate!

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

this is hilaroius (puts down popcorn to type after reading)

quote from cougar
honor is honor, period... it isn't a matter of like, or dislike.

I believe I have found the root of the problem

this should be in the guide, and this goes for all new leaders as well

TO SIGN A NAP
step 1:
go to the relations page
step 2:
write in the family number of who you want to NAP
step 3:
spam the other leader to sign the nap

IF THE LEADER(S) HAVE NOT SIGNED THE NAP, there is no NAP
IF A NEW LEADER WAS VOTED IN, the NAP, would survive ( the mods made sure its not glitchy )

Now as far as honor is concerned, I don't know where you get that idea from, its a GAME, the mods stuck in the nuke op FOR A REASON!

I do not support nap breaking, but I don't support any fool who has some misguided belief on NAPS and honor.

Either way, Good luck, It would look like you need it, your amusing thread has attracted allot of attention, and I believe you have become a very, juicy target

<><I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every moment of it><>
                                 <><TRI FOR LIFE!><>
                              <><deaths vengeance><>

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

........

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

ummmm, btw bc. when you sent those messages to me i dont remember my exact response, as i dont believe i was totally sober, but i believe my response was something like "what are you talking about and why are you telling me this?"

PP
i posted that because i knew shit like this would go down. there never was a nap as repeatedly cougar is unable to bring anything concrete to the table.



killa, rv, colorado, lonez, myself, etc. yea you guys have heard of a lot of us, most of us have been around a good while. someone please feel free to bring up something that would point to the possibility of any 1 of us breaking a nap.

cougar, if you wish i can give you an example of what a nap looks like

<KT|Away> I am the Trump of IC

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

PP is just being himself, Always opens his mouth when there is nothing to talk about. tongue Love you still PP wink

Retired forever.

Quote:
Attacking is time, banking saves the day.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

lol...  thats what i have been trying to say and get thru to cougar... thnx mel for bringing it out tongue and poke me on msn u f00 X(

cougar, the fact that u couldnt show us the signed nap, proves that there was nothing signed in the first place, thus i dont see how we have a valid nap tongue

btw... mel... dont make me rape u big_smile

I am back... back again... for while that is big_smile

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

btw...

*waves to stunny, u inactive f00* tongue

@matrix... whos 1062... o.O tongue

I am back... back again... for while that is big_smile

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

LOL WE GOT A NAP FOOL u hit me pay back twice so came hit me i dare u tongue.keep ur core clear or i will invade it tongue

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

and my point is that the same nap has been signed so many times that all you have to do is say yes, and it's done.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

if you want to risk the chance of one party not thinking you have a nap. seriously we had mors infiltrating you guys for a week. most would put 2 and 2 together. the part when you told me we were napped, and i had no idea what you were talking about should've been another light bulb

<KT|Away> I am the Trump of IC

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

lol lonez tongue i am coming back, just wait till my pop and research gets up smile damn exams always kill my round.

Fremen Forever!

1       M00lar Ftw (1431)       5165pl      129971306nw

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

ok, its not that hard.  I KillamahirE smile noted that there was absolutely no NAP signed you can "talk" about it however you want.  Unless you "sign" a CF or "sign" a NAP there is NO NAP smile,  Which therefore you should never stop attacking till one is signed

I am a slave and I am a master, No restraints and unchecked collectors, I exist throught my name, to self ablige.  KillamahirE Will Rule!!!

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

melvin, remmember me to take 1 week off work and bash your fam to shit soon.

Haters gonna hate!

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

not to mention i get to read how mucho couger is going to be replaced, noted from his own fam.  so some type of mistake has been made on that side

I am a slave and I am a master, No restraints and unchecked collectors, I exist throught my name, to self ablige.  KillamahirE Will Rule!!!