Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

Stupid leaders. Get nap signed in relations and say Sign Official instead of whining in Uni tongue

Go to both sides, I dont like anyone =P

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

*slaps joor*

<KT|Away> I am the Trump of IC

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

well for killamahire to even be in that family, i gave them the respect of friends, so that a word "yes" meant yes.
but i hope that killa learns a more discerning way to accept friends from now on.
and colorado.... i nor any BC will ever trust you again.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

so basically, you never responded to colorados offer?>

<KT|Away> I am the Trump of IC

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

yup both partys then nap

Signed, willem1984 of Colorado Spider (1092)
Reply
Save
Week 46, 9

ok i can offer you a 48 hour nap same as what ou did with our aly

Signed, willem1984 of Colorado Spider (1092)
Reply
Save

we do have a nap.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

i never erase my messages, both sent, or received... since arctic tried to screw me on one that i clearly included my allies, but because i erased the message, i couldn't show documentation... you can have the mods verify it as a undoctored message, as i am sure one of them will.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

and btw that was the confirmed message "sent by me" that we have a nap, and there was no ansewer to it otherwise, other than questions of our allies being involved.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

cougar a nap signed is only when its signed by both leaders... but if there isnt any copy to back it up, that means there isnt any nap... wouldnt help even if u posted that 2 msgs that colo sent a thousand times over =/

what does BC stand for again?

anyway... go both sides... o.O

I am back... back again... for while that is big_smile

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

"Undeath
Solar Warrior
1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!yes it appears it will be a 2v1
yes they are going to complain that we are napped

BUT

but, we arent. a nap was discussed, never finalized. lack of communication between leaders, whatever it may have been. bottom line, there is no nap and i will say little more on the matter.


therefore
spiders ftw!"

I think that about sums it up, before anyone evan complained or whined u wrote in advance that they would whine u are naped, why would u think that? Easy, because u knew u either had a nap or led them to believe u had a nap, so u could pull your lameass n00b nap break on them because u cant win planets any other way.

Your 1st post sais it all dude

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

Agreed with PP really..

je

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

Alright, folks smile here is RV's nice message. I never EVER signed a nap with 58 or 60...

Retired forever.

Quote:
Attacking is time, banking saves the day.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

it was told to me nap, and i said yes a nap.... so it was said by colorado, and i agreed...
then this, so i was the last clarification to it, and responded to the positive, nothing else was said, so who would have thought different... we have all ( non-nOObs maybe not)  known the terms of a 48hr nap, almost since the games conception.
why is it different now.... because someone wanted the upper hand in a fight, and under the situation knew that we thought there was a nap, and broke it, for an advantage in an attack.
not unlike arctic in his dishonorable ways.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

and BC is a group of people that will keep tract of these things, and know you from now on, and will, if able, not honor any agreement that you have made.... till you prove yourself honorable, so you become a farm able family no matter what agreement....
if you aren't honorable then you deserve no honor.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

and also will give every presents( as you did others) that you have an agreement, so that you find out first hand how it feels to be on the other side of the dishonorable coin.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

hmm ohh well... if u said u and colo reached an agreement over the nap, then show us what was agreed or signed?

I am back... back again... for while that is big_smile

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

Week 14, 12, to willem1984 of Colorado Spider (1092)

Week 47, 9

yup both partys then nap

Signed, willem1984 of Colorado Spider (1092)
Reply
Save
Week 46, 9

ok i can offer you a 48 hour nap same as what ou did with our aly

Signed, willem1984 of Colorado Spider (1092)
Reply
Save

we do have a nap.

that was the completion "we do have a nap" to the so called question.

he submitted to me and i responded yes, to anyone that has played this game very long that is how a 48hr nap is... we all understand the rules to it.

only perm-naps have more rules.

42 (edited by Lonez 06-Sep-2008 03:51:01)

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

err but that doesnt show the signed nap agreement =/ and that shows nthg cept for the fact that he might be willing to accept the same conditions his ally signed with u guys... it nv meant that a nap was signed...

and where's the msgs that u sent to colo then?

I am back... back again... for while that is big_smile

43 (edited by Gwynedd 06-Sep-2008 11:42:05)

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

Week 44, 11, to UD of Brown Recluse (1092)

Week 39, 11 After a brave fight our family member Darth Tidus had to flee the [co-ords aren't allowed in the forums] which was attacked by GodofDarkness of family 1092.
sorry i sent the message to the right person now
   
Week 44, 11, to Mors of GodofDarkness (1092)

Week 39, 11 After a brave fight our family member Darth Tidus had to flee the [X(] which was attacked by GodofDarkness of family 1092.

we have a nap dude, that planet will have to be given back
   
Week 44, 11, to UD of Brown Recluse (1092)

becaue it is an ally nap between our alliance and yours.
   
Week 44, 11, to UD of Brown Recluse (1092)

we have a 48hr nap dude.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

i can post every message that i ever sent or was ever sent, like i said i do not erase any message since arctic, tried to screw my allies on one 5 rounds ago.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

can you look at the dates and put it together, or do i have to put it in chronological order.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

errr those msgs u just posted only shows u saying that there's a nap but doesnt show the nap agreement that was signed..

if by msging the way u did to ppl who took planets off ur fam, i could do the same to every fam that takes a planet off me =/

all we need to see as proof of a nap would be the agreement that both fams signed... the standard nap agreement msg if you know what i mean...

I am back... back again... for while that is big_smile

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

loonez,
stop trying to win favor of (if your not actually part of the family to begin with).
it wont work.
i have always been "my word is bond", and everyone BC and others understand this... i have also not insulted anyone but nati.... because he couldn't help but voice his insults to me.

ask anyone that has ever been a part of my family i follow as i wish to lead, and i honor every word i say, and have even after much negotiation, have even settled people from sporadic attacks.... look at the time dates... they show that he said "same as our allies" and i sent "yes we have a nap"...... meaning the standard 48hr nap, meaning i should have got 48 hours to adjust to this.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

im not trying to win favour for any1... yes im in 92... but if there was a nap signed in the first place, i would never support a nap break... those who have played with me knows it...

the thing is if u say u can prove that a nap was indeed signed, then why dont u just show us the signed agreement instead of posting all the other irrelevant msgs about u telling people a nap that nobody knew of... >.<

btw... its Lonez... not Loonez...

I am back... back again... for while that is big_smile

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

but, the fact is i have.... him saying we have a nap, and me saying yes we do... is conformation.
we don't need to copy paste some well know document that we have known for years to prove it... just say yes and done.
i have been playing for too damn long to even appreciate this bull, as an "OH prove it".
he said yes i said yes... end of story... no one likes to be on the wrong side of right.... but everyone knows i would rather lose than to let someone win by dishonor.
if it is a good fight, then hell yeah, but if someone gets a sneak attack by making a false nap.... then we all know that they deserve what they get, and require no honor in doing it.

Re: 1092 vs 1058 +1060 ?!?!?!?!

and as so that we realize we have a nap, we will only endeavor to either do opp's or retakes, and one possible banker raid to keep the status quo.
as they can attest, if they be honest at all... that is all that has happened so far.
they knew we were moving on another family, and they (colorado) took full advantage of it.