it really to early to make any predictions never know whats gonna happen.

thats just the way it is we do this to have fun until the end of round! "D

true.. but that are predictions based on line-up and activity etc this is based on something that is changing every tick

Hey I am known for showing econ and position Contender/Pretender analysises.

I was ummm... Late for realizing the new round was up, or I would have had my positional one made and outlined the best fam starting positions.

hehe yea exactly @ elrohir

but yes it is good fun

> Elrohir wrote:

> Don't get me wrong, its a nice idea. Just a bit off because in 5 ticks this one could be worthless.

I agree, it wouldn't look so bad either if he had bothered to tidy his post up a little, it reads bad because it is so god dam messy

he did something new and interesting just be happy he bothered posting one

maybe something else you remember. there was you sunstorm but also someone else with a similar name. it was girl/woman I think

do you know?

much better

yes elhor i do firestorm ? maybe DOA was in PW wasnt it a long time ago. thats where i got my name

doomer it's a simple econ list.

Take fam NW, subtract planets * 800 from fam NW. Do a simple sort function on the new networth levels. This is their economy in a nut shell.

Designed to be simplistic, I am not going to worry about pop bankers versus resourcer infra. It's an analysis of where they sit.

Considering the dramatic differences here, the math is insightful. The top 15 are all economically stablish, but the next bunch start to vary to far from the top's standards. Excluding a jump in just explored or a saved stockpile for a jump, detectable if tried again tommorrow or afterwards, they will not have a chance to economically catch up.

Einstein - Please calculate these NW and planet numbers, then tell me that what you wrote below isn't a bit weird - seeing as in my calculation these two families have the SAME econ?

6  WE HAVE ISSUES!____ yikes (1102) (x:97,y:49)  22  35477  17877
Whats to say, your in the top 10, you have plenty of planets, your a contender at this stage

11  Birth of Capricorn (1055) (x:139,y:131)  19  32993  17793
Ok time to stop the repetative... two other families currently rank higher than you. Your low planet count, and low econ is a bit bad. I actually am calling you a pretender at this stage. Best get those gears in motion!

the difference is space Keerbtje

The upper family has 3 spare planets. More space = cheaper building costs = better econ growth rate. The difference may be 84 NW aka 21 total infra, but hey... more space is more space!