Re: Pretenders Vs Contenders Capricorn Round 1
LOL, "do we have a nap"..... "we have a nap" end of story.
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → Pretenders Vs Contenders Capricorn Round 1
LOL, "do we have a nap"..... "we have a nap" end of story.
lol... no offense cougar... u still have not learnt how a nap should be signed ![]()
> BC Cougar wrote:
> LOL, "do we have a nap"..... "we have a nap" end of story.
goodness. see this is why people need to make sure they have a leader who knows what they are doing
you know what, i was bored last night and decided to read through the previous PvCs and nobody thought any good of 92... and we were stuck at the mid-20s for the first half of the round... but look where we ended up at the end... and it wasnt because of infrawhoring, i should know as our infra jumps sucked big time ![]()
well a job well done to my fam... *i lub u guys and gal* ![]()
and kudos to the rest as well ![]()
Undeath - its useless debating Cougar - he is a 100 % imbecile ![]()
He ruined the round for the family and now blames me for telling him to F off and stripping him of leadership
Calling me a SPY and a NOOB ![]()
A spy for whom ? the family you told your fam we had a NAP with
?
A noob why ? because i only played like 10 - 15 rounds of ic ?
the fact that he still claims here that there WAS a NAP - and it does not take the signatures of both leaders to make one shows you exactly what I have been dealing with the entire round with this idiot. Post after post I have explained to him why he is a dummy and sucks at IC, braking it down into points and explaining the flaws and holes in his strategy and gameplay - and in return I get the posts - you are a spy, you are to blame because you didn't listen to me enough etc
Well it is the way it is - just a warning for the future if you get couagar in your fam don't elect him the leader. He seems to be a profound believer in a theory that the leader must never be challenged on his orders and strats - so he will make a nice little worker bee and a mindless slave for someone who knows how to play the game - as a leader he will royally screw up the round for his entire fam and then blame the people who resist him ![]()
Nuff said - Cougar i specifically left you out of my previous post, leaving the intra family fighting anonymous - not wanting to bring shame to you any more than you have already brought on yourself, you still came here and started blaming me again
I guess thats your style which makes yo extra bad - you dont take reesponsibility for screwing up - and as we all see you don't learn either coming back to main forum over and over again saying yes I made a NAP while the entire galaxy laughs at you as if you were crusty the clown.
oh and that mr. magoo thingie I dunno about that - I have a rather exquisite taste in movies so leslie nielsen and mr magoo is and area where you really are above me
- if it only was so in IC we would have done great ![]()
Zidi, they took more planets later the round meaning they saved with more infra.
...in my day...
threads capped out wayyyyyyyyyy before 103 pages ![]()
lol halfway through the round we had caught up to you 55.....and by the time eor got here we were pushing 500+ and in the last week alone we bumped it up 500 more.
and btw....we werent building infra lol!
we built infra 3x this round....1st week for BOR, 1 week before we fought 83, 1 week before we fought 63. and that was it. the rest of the time we were using that stuff to fight with. we never once had more infra than ure fam. not even after u guys got knocked off....our big banker had built fleet probably as big as most attackers and was fighting just as much as anyone else.
so technically Zidi's comment was right on the dot
I wouldn't say those were the ONLY times we built infra Hydro
But they were definately the only times we did any sort of jumps
for the most part everyone in our fam was only at 300 % ob
well ur infrawhore anyways ![]()
i had 3 planets at 700% ob ![]()
yay lonez! unfortunately ive only seen 1 person who wasn't in 1092 even acknowledge our existance when it comes to how far we rose ![]()
wow rotweiler still denying that the strat fact like it's a pink elephant, you are not so smart yourself dude, you got leadership because, 1st you broke the family apart on a strat that worked for the TOP F'N FAMILIES and still won't even mention it, 2nd your systems were weak so people set up inside of you and wasted our family 3rd you became leader long enough to give away 175 planets then went inactive.
so if your going to call me an imbecile for a NAP screw up... the your a Magoo for the rest.
time to close this thread....
Im bored now,
6 days till new capri? ... hmm ...
I had 26 planets at 700%
Probably the same 26 planets at 700% for about 3/4 of the round ![]()
Your preset family does not exist. This is truly weird, and most likely means your preset family has been set incorrectly. You can not join in this way.
Back
![]()
and talking about multis:
2008-10-07 Size rank 9
2008-10-07 Networth rank 30
2008-10-07 Galaxy round ended in Capricorn
2008-10-07 Size rank 9
2008-10-07 Networth rank 30
2008-10-07 Galaxy round ended in Capricorn
2008-10-07 Size rank 13
2008-10-07 Networth rank 52
2008-10-07 Galaxy round ended in Capricorn
![]()
![]()
Your preset family does not exist. This is truly weird, and most likely means your preset family has been set incorrectly. You can not join in this way.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111111111111111111oneoneoneoneoneoneoneoneoneoneoneoneoneoneoneoneone
Its because of the stay in fam option ![]()
Those who chose to delete account where deleted from the ranks a little while after and thats why many have a few more in fam history and why peopl roze in rank... ![]()
*coughs and points at the Capri HoF in his signature*
Over 500 people in Capri and only 250 views of the page :'(
who would that be undeath?
Imperial Forum → Universal News → Pretenders Vs Contenders Capricorn Round 1
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.