• Posts: 635
  • Tag points: 226

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

lmao chomp come on...

you save for 3 days and we're supposed to jump 3 attackers to the same level as you guys? Be realistic dude.

Oracle | Bane | The Justice 7873

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

127 Reply by Nolio (edited by Nolio 10-Mar-2013 16:43:34)

  • Posts: 3,639
  • Tag points: 345

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Chomp_On_This wrote:
Nolio wrote:
Chomp_On_This wrote:

lol desperate loser strategy. what the hell are you talking about?

He's talking about the fact that in a cancellation war you generally go mano y mano with the attackers. Trying to clear each other and beat each other. People don't usually touch bankers until like the 2nd day or so. But a lot of times when people are losing the attacker battle, they try to compensate by taking a bunch of planets off bankers to make it seem like they did something. Only thing is, 9 times out of 10 banker planets have been deportalled anyway so its not exactly an accomplishment but its a nice self pat on the back for someone who already lost.


Then why did you only jump one attacker way bigger than everyone? We can't touch his ports, so we cleared everyone else and now are going after bankers because it is the only logical route for us. If you guys would have jumped like we did, spread out among 3 people we could have a fun and dandy cancellation war but you didn't, so stop whining.


1. I'm not whining or doing anything close to it. I was just answering your question about the basic principles of a cancellation war.

2. You guys saved and cancelled not us. We just executed a  strategy in terms of equalizing the situation.

3. Going after bankers is fine. Just not a very productive way to win this war. In fact, everything you guys have done so far has been odd lol

4. Edit: But this is all fine. I'm mildly entertained and that's what IC is all about.

Sex without the e is still SX!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 174

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

I love you both.

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,413

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

say what you want nolio we are rapping bankers BIG time while ours are hardly able to be hit

I already have the biggest banker of one of the 2 fams hehe down to where 5 droids beats him

and the 2nd biggest is almost there also smile

so this war aint over by a LONG shot

watch and see 4 of us attackers against 1 and see whose bankers get killed first smile

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 635
  • Tag points: 226

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

This is fun smile

Looking forward to the next few days.

Oracle | Bane | The Justice 7873

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,639
  • Tag points: 345

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

WS IC Legend wrote:

say what you want nolio we are rapping bankers BIG time while ours are hardly able to be hit

I already have the biggest banker of one of the 2 fams hehe down to where 5 droids beats him

and the 2nd biggest is almost there also smile

so this war aint over by a LONG shot

watch and see 4 of us attackers against 1 and see whose bankers get killed first smile


lol You cancelled, not me. So be my guest. You didn't need to save, plan and jump fleet to kill bankers though =p

Sex without the e is still SX!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 174

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

NathanLee wrote:

This is fun smile

Looking forward to the next few days.

 

+1

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,033
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Doesn't really matter who wins this one anyway. 72/81 will eat the winners alive. And they won't safe for 3 days before they cancel. Wonder how you'll deal with that lol.

So you should have gone for them, but you couldn't as they had probably saved as much as your alliance and you were to chicken to get into a war with equal savings...

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Chicken? LOL. so cancelling for a war requires the aggressor to have equal savings?

and tbh u guys had more than us at one point. u guys chose to jump. we didnt.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,832
  • Tag points: 187

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

sucks to spend alot of ur savings only to have someone cancel right after.. lol sucks but thats how IC is. u should of canceled on them and had the better chance/advantage

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

136 Reply by WS IC Legend (edited by WS IC Legend 10-Mar-2013 18:07:05)

  • Posts: 5,413

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
62 planet(s) captured by Phil Robertson (100 %).
2 planet(s) captured by Missy Robertson (100 %) (2 retakes).
2 planet(s) captured by Si Robertson (100 %).
-------------------
59 from #7882
7 from #7873
-------------------

----------------
-   BLOW-UPS   -
----------------
19 enemy planet(s) blown up by Phil Robertson
4 enemy planet(s) blown up by Si Robertson

---------------
-   DEFEATS   -
-------------------
38 to #7882
35 to #7873

MOST of those ^^^ are just retakes haha

while you see me 100% on successful attacks

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,033
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

We didn't have any savings

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,063
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

----------------
-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
122 planet(s) captured by Wrath (100 %) (1 retakes).
84 planet(s) captured by Pride (100 %).
3 planet(s) captured by Lust (100 %) (3 retakes).
-------------------
144 from #7873
65 from #7882
-------------------
We overwhelmed the enemy 209 times. 2 families and 208 planet(s) involved.
We actually gained 193 planet(s) in total. Unfortunately they managed to retake 15.

---------------
-   DEFEATS   -
---------------
29 to #7873
22 to #7882
-------------------

Never rule out the possibility that you are a complete idiot

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 174

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Pew PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW!!!! XDDDDDDDDDDD

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,413

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Let those in UNI look at who is doing what to who and decide who is winning smile

Oh and nolio hows this feel lomfao from WS to you tongue

"We have destroyed 15% of the target'sCash factory all over their empire! This will teach them a lesson!"

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,063
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/arc … 73388b.jpg

Never rule out the possibility that you are a complete idiot

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 174

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/4/23jn6mu.jpg

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,639
  • Tag points: 345

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

WS IC Legend wrote:

Let those in UNI look at who is doing what to who and decide who is winning smile

Oh and nolio hows this feel lomfao from WS to you tongue

"We have destroyed 15% of the target'sCash factory all over their empire! This will teach them a lesson!"


That's fine with me. Its a war after all.

Sex without the e is still SX!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,639
  • Tag points: 345

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

dRaGoNsUP wrote:

Chicken? LOL. so cancelling for a war requires the aggressor to have equal savings?

and tbh u guys had more than us at one point. u guys chose to jump. we didnt.

We haven't saved for than a day this round. And all of that has gone to infra

Sex without the e is still SX!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,734
  • Tag points: 34

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

If you consider raiding me an accomplishment, then your IC skills are not to be bragged about. tongue

Modestus Experitus

Arby: A very strict mod, reminds me of a fat redneck who drives a truck around all day with a beer in one hand. I hated this guy at the start, however, I played a round in PW with him where he went as an anonymous player. Our fam got smashed up and everyone pretty much left. Arby stayed around and helped out the remaining family. At the end of the round he revealed himself.... My views on him have changed since. Your a good guy.....

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Nolio wrote:
dRaGoNsUP wrote:

Chicken? LOL. so cancelling for a war requires the aggressor to have equal savings?

and tbh u guys had more than us at one point. u guys chose to jump. we didnt.

We haven't saved for than a day this round. And all of that has gone to infra


well kenpachi did show up with 20mil iron. thats not saving?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,413

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

and justice had 71 mil iron for not saving thats pretty good

But the FACT is after we seen the whole picture we decided what was best to do to win and you look at these results and tell me if what we decided is working or not

----------------
-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
126 planet(s) captured by Wrath (100 %) (1 retakes).
84 planet(s) captured by Pride (100 %).
71 planet(s) captured by Mountain man (100 %) (12 retakes).
62 planet(s) captured by Phil Robertson (100 %).
3 planet(s) captured by Lust (100 %) (3 retakes).
2 planet(s) captured by Si Robertson (100 %).
2 planet(s) captured by Missy Robertson (100 %) (2 retakes).
-------------------
202 from #7873
148 from #7882
-------------------
We overwhelmed the enemy 350 times. 2 families and 348 planet(s) involved.
We actually gained 307 planet(s) in total. Unfortunately they managed to retake 41.

----------------
-   BLOW-UPS   -
----------------
19 enemy planet(s) blown up by Phil Robertson
11 enemy planet(s) blown up by Pride
7 enemy planet(s) blown up by Wrath
4 enemy planet(s) blown up by Si Robertson
2 enemy planet(s) blown up by Sloth
1 enemy planet(s) blown up by Lust

1 planet(s) from Missy Robertson have been blown up.


---------------
-   DEFEATS   -
---------------
28 planet(s) lost by Jase Robertson
26 planet(s) lost by Pride
22 planet(s) lost by Phil Robertson
17 planet(s) lost by Missy Robertson
16 planet(s) lost by Wrath
15 planet(s) lost by Si Robertson
6 planet(s) lost by Lust
5 planet(s) lost by Gluttony
3 planet(s) lost by Sloth
2 planet(s) lost by Willy Robertson
1 planet(s) lost by Mountain man
1 planet(s) lost by Greed
-------------------
71 to #7873
71 to #7882
-------------------

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,413

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Oh and since Justice used everything on HIM look what nukes have done to nolio the n00blio lmfao

Childhood Baby Back Ribs          2394675gc
Childhood Baby Back Ribs     1664422gc   

yes we hit cf's 3-4 times and to's about 6 times tongue

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,639
  • Tag points: 345

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

lol I'm banking. I'm supposed to get nuked and attacked. I have no problems with this at all.

Sex without the e is still SX!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,063
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Oh ya maybe we will start nuking attackers and CPFFing bankers ... will THAT get you all riled up?

Never rule out the possibility that you are a complete idiot

0 Dislike 0 Post Points