Haha i dont ask for leadership, i take it. Since iam a born Leader, Logistics Expert!

And dont accuse me of cheating, i dont need to cheat to run a solid Econ for SOR'S and throughout.

Ask Torqez he will tell you, even though we had our differences he knows i wouldnt use a bug like that, infact so do the other mods, i have reported bugs similar in the past straight away, not abused them, the market bug about 1-2 years ago, where u could buy negative, it was me and AA that found this.

So yes keep ur accusations to yourself, you know nothing, Sheep.

Lee wrote:

Haha i dont ask for leadership, i take it. Since iam a born Leader, Logistics Expert!

And dont accuse me of cheating, i dont need to cheat to run a solid Econ for SOR'S and throughout.

Ask Torqez he will tell you, even though we had our differences he knows i wouldnt use a bug like that, infact so do the other mods, i have reported bugs similar in the past straight away, not abused them, the market bug about 1-2 years ago, where u could buy negative, it was me and AA that found this.

So yes keep ur accusations to yourself, you know nothing, Sheep.

@ Chomp @Pickle

Read it, Sit in the corner, then cry a little.

I'am better then you, you are crap. face it its life.

Also u didnt go straight into vmode, we didnt know, till the next tick that it actually put u in it. We attacked becuase the game let us, not becuase we needed to abuse anything.

Like i said iam Good you are not byebye.

Lee wrote:

Lee wrote:

Haha i dont ask for leadership, i take it. Since iam a born Leader, Logistics Expert!

And dont accuse me of cheating, i dont need to cheat to run a solid Econ for SOR'S and throughout.

Ask Torqez he will tell you, even though we had our differences he knows i wouldnt use a bug like that, infact so do the other mods, i have reported bugs similar in the past straight away, not abused them, the market bug about 1-2 years ago, where u could buy negative, it was me and AA that found this.

So yes keep ur accusations to yourself, you know nothing, Sheep.

@ Chomp @Pickle

Read it, Sit in the corner, then cry a little.

I'am better then you, you are crap. face it its life.

Also u didnt go straight into vmode, we didnt know, till the next tick that it actually put u in it. We attacked becuase the game let us, not becuase we needed to abuse anything.

Like i said iam Good you are not byebye.

When?

Or are you also confused about the difference between then/than also?

Again, the only reason we went into vmode was because Lee broke NAP.  I would never do this for any other reason, I can take an online ass whoopin' have taken them several times .  We just didn't want Lee to have the satisfaction of cheating to win a war.  Now the round is being reset for cheating [Useless accusation] and cheaters never win.

Anyone dumb enough to make Lee leader next round will enjoy some early raids.

GeneralSkulls wrote:

[PW2] PICKLE ARMY wrote:

Again, the only reason we went into vmode was because Lee broke NAP.  I would never do this for any other reason, I can take an online ass whoopin' have taken them several times .  We just didn't want Lee to have the satisfaction of cheating to win a war.  Now the round is being reset for cheating [Useless accusation] and cheaters never win.

Anyone dumb enough to make Lee leader next round will enjoy some early raids.

i am trying to wrap my head around this still.... so LEE (our alliance) broke nap by cancelling an ingame nap (that was signed by all families).  if you didn't like the nap why sign it?  it was signed, your alliance broke the nap by having core violations and not giving them to us... and WE broke the nap?  no what you did was realize that you would loose and decided that we would not get planets so you went into v-mode........ that is the lamest thing i have ever seen on IC, and i have done some pretty lame things myself   just like when noir changed his nap conditions to give another family 500+ planets so my fam couldn't have them.  is this the strategies that people are coming up with?? if i cant win, lets go give our planets away or run into v-mode.  i for one think that using v-mode that way (the way it wasn't intended) is cheating itself.  if you are going to loose, your recourse is either diplomacy or protection mode after an initial spanking.

mods please look into making v-mode for vacations not for hiding!  its lame and should be cheating imho.

First of all vmode was completely removed... second we never received DPA for your allinace ... core violations was not the reason nap was cancelled ... still have not seen ANY messages requesting core violations.

The nap was signed with the agreement that the cancel date would be decided later ... it WAS decided later... then Lee BROKE his word and cancelled early... he did not do it in the name of core violations, he did it because he does not value his word... anyways it doesn't matter round is over.

Look im sick of ur trash talking potty mouths, Chomp especiallly. if u have an accusation for cheating (which is a perma blockable offense)

Do what Keerb said, go to #mod report me and shhh your gums around here, and stop following me like a little fangirl.

+ What GS said

[PW2] PICKLE ARMY wrote:

GeneralSkulls wrote:

i am trying to wrap my head around this still.... so LEE (our alliance) broke nap by cancelling an ingame nap (that was signed by all families).  if you didn't like the nap why sign it?  it was signed, your alliance broke the nap by having core violations and not giving them to us... and WE broke the nap?  no what you did was realize that you would loose and decided that we would not get planets so you went into v-mode........ that is the lamest thing i have ever seen on IC, and i have done some pretty lame things myself   just like when noir changed his nap conditions to give another family 500+ planets so my fam couldn't have them.  is this the strategies that people are coming up with?? if i cant win, lets go give our planets away or run into v-mode.  i for one think that using v-mode that way (the way it wasn't intended) is cheating itself.  if you are going to loose, your recourse is either diplomacy or protection mode after an initial spanking.

mods please look into making v-mode for vacations not for hiding!  its lame and should be cheating imho.

First of all vmode was completely removed... second we never received DPA for your allinace ... core violations was not the reason nap was cancelled ... still have not seen ANY messages requesting core violations.

The nap was signed with the agreement that the cancel date would be decided later ... it WAS decided later... then Lee BROKE his word and cancelled early... he did not do it in the name of core violations, he did it because he does not value his word... anyways it doesn't matter round is over.

Round is over and it doesn't count

GeneralSkulls wrote:

first of all you DID receive DPA from us, i was the one going to take the planets if you guys ever responded, once a day (my log in amt at the time) i looked to see if you agreed to it and take the planets, never was able to (until now that is;) )

i'll grant that i wasnt very active during the time that the nap was cancelled, what i can tell you is that when i was in chat i would hear lee and dev talking about the violations and what to do about it.  i also read all the naps that we make when posted in forums. wish i could go retrieve it now, but can't, and i don't recall seeing anything about cancel times, yes granted i smoke alot of pot, but still i mostly remember things that will matter to my exploration.

From the signed NAP:
- Standard comp rules
- Violations will be given up not traded
- Cancellation must be sent to 1 VL & leader of both fams
- Nap is to be signed in-game
- 80/70 pays 78/84 150 planets
- it will be a EOR war with the dates of cancellation settled when WS gets on

That date was agreed on by Lee as stated in the forum under the original thread:
"i did agree to 14 days cancel time before EOR."

If that isn't breaking a NAP, I don't know what is. There should be a way to implement signed ingame naps to have a specific cancelation date built in to prevent people like Lee from taking advantage of it and breaking NAPs.