2 people that are in my fam..

    TheInactiveOne    Partaxian    1100gc    1    [ONLINE]
    Inactive    Bankzor    1100gc    1    [ONLINE]

looks like its going to be an active round lol

I disagree with the  fam size, my fam had 3 actives all round (88).  Anyone who did join after killing the inactive, just deleted and tried for a more active one.  If more fams have an equal amount of actives rather then just the top few how does it hurt?  There were like 64 players by Eor who where "active".  How does that make 96, so like 5 actives a fam (if it was spread out) .  At least shrink the size some and allow the bottom to compete. Smaller fams lets fams with less active members have a chance to survive and not ruin 1/2 the gal round imo.  Also more fans equals more possible conflicts as people have targets they can war.  Oh we'll commence to destroying the fams with only a few actives and infra whoring again I suppose.

The only time having less active players will hurt families is the very start of the round, when small nw can make a huge difference. Now if there is a family with three players they can never compete against the two or three lucky families that have 8 active players, whereas if it was limited to 6 people per family then they have more of a chance.

Also, all I'm suggesting is to reduce the amount of players to 6 or 7 but to keep the amount of families at 12.

I don't mind the map this round. Sure it's small and has a ton of systems. But I can see a number of ways this can promote attacking for fams that want to and infraing for fams that can't attack. Idk give it a go guys and next round we can make changes but lets discuss it while this round is going. Give time for discussion.

what about if there were less plts per system?

> Stichio wrote:

> The only time having less active players will hurt families is the very start of the round, when small nw can make a huge difference. Now if there is a family with three players they can never compete against the two or three lucky families that have 8 active players, whereas if it was limited to 6 people per family then they have more of a chance.

That's the real problem, SoR decides the future of the gal, so many fams with inactives will go SS or go on a defensive strat, and they're marked to be farmed in the 2nd half of the round, it always happens.
With a player pool we make sure every fam has an ezperienced leader and at least 3 active members, so chances are equal at SoR, and with only 60 players around this pool is damn easy to do.

I think 5 players is the right number for PW, lets face it, we are a pack, so big map is not an option anymore. Wethere we like it or not, we have to reduce, reduce and reduce

We have 62 people joined... Last round ended with 64.... Lets hope some extra join for this round

More -=Retired=- then the other bitches

its like its tradition

Ds33!!

Allso Yo than

Come on ppl, start randomming in, 33 spots left!