Re: What Family Done More Wars This MW Round?
psh 1 ich and thick like a can of Copenhagen
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → What Family Done More Wars This MW Round?
psh 1 ich and thick like a can of Copenhagen
We've fought every family in the top ten except 41 (who payed for nap, then never delivered all of the planets):
This is what we have to date, though we are missing 7-8 years of data:
----------------
- CAPTURES -
----------------
1046 planet(s) captured by M.
670 planet(s) captured by C.
295 planet(s) captured by D.
215 planet(s) captured by I.
-------------------
2305 planet(s) have been captured.
---------------
- DEFEATS -
---------------
294 planet(s) lost by C.
241 planet(s) lost by L.
176 planet(s) lost by D.
171 planet(s) lost by M.
-------------------
1075 planet(s) have been lost.
Ya farming inactives... ![]()
1046 - 300 = 746. ![]()
gilly999
Planetary Conqueror
6654 still farming us
im in 6652
last year
-------------------
152 to #6654
-------------------
that would take the toatall to well over 300 planets now i would think
15 SeriesOFunfortunateEVENTS (6652) [5,39] 843 13693943 69684
4 Warphabet (6654) [77,18] 3470 50410470 153575
they farmed us for like 200 planets when we where just in NW range, then we dident attack back because we went out of NW range, and then we went back into NW range and they attacked again, now we just been trying to retake planets, ill ask 1 of my fam members how many planets it is cause its probley more like almost 500, nice way to try and make it to #1 but i dont think that will happen with u guys taticts
Kill them Aleph!
They searching my arse.... ![]()
Warphabet (6654) has DECLARED WAR on us.
These is war of attackers!!!!!
Ladies please search one good dildo.... ![]()
Lol the warphabet snagged tons if the 300+ we lost to 39 before we could retake
Middle, i respect you but about 500 of your planets were taken from small or medium sized fams like 52 (right after other fams had warred them too). you guys got early PNAPs with 45 and my fam, so you had plenty of time and space to establish a big core. other big fams couldn't get a foothold in your core because they couldn't get through my fam or 45's area, so it's not like you guys were ever really tested.;P you guys didn't even have 1 big cancel war all round.:P
> Magni wrote:
> Middle, i respect you but about 500 of your planets were taken from small or medium sized fams like 52 (right after other fams had warred them too). you guys got early PNAPs with 45 and my fam, so you had plenty of time and space to establish a big core. other big fams couldn't get a foothold in your core because they couldn't get through my fam or 45's area, so it's not like you guys were ever really tested.;P you guys didn't even have 1 big cancel war all round.:P
sorry magni get youre facts right
after first week we maked our first nap a long time and yes we fighted all top fams to keep our area clean we did so dont talk any thing if you dont know youre facts
and yes 52 was the smallest fam we hitted they opped us jumped atacker even after all those nap offers free offers im talking so ya you fight back
God! Middle and Colorado like farming small and inactives families.... OMG!!!!! ![]()
Fortune! We doing one small defense. ![]()
For Register as going this:
Rank Family Planets Networth Score
1 Warphabet (6654) [77,18] 4465 105764811 213231
12 Marvel Villains (6643) [52,99] 1620 72799227 104350
http://www.sandervdwal.nl/ic/statistics/family-statistics/mw/6643/
http://www.sandervdwal.nl/ic/statistics/family-statistics/mw/6654/
Observe who attacked first, I am innocent as costum and peace man.... ![]()
Who cares about cancel wars? Isn't the whole point of the game to fight constantly? That is what we've done. We didn't sit back and play the eco game like some others have had the opportunity to do with constant NAPs, and if sometimes families that are smaller get hit for being all over our systems (which is usually the case), then that is how the game is played. After all, the 40% NW rule still rules out quite a bit, unless they hit you first (52).
54 has been known as the worst farmer the entire round
. That means constant captures, call it fighting even if you will!
Again I ask, who did we farm? 6652 attacked us, when they were out of range, and lost about 300 total planets. Other than that, name a family?
The way many of you have turned this into a pure NAP/eco game has made the game quite boring. Moreover, the constant naps make the fighting more difficult for the families who have a no-NAP policy. We have played hard and played honorably. If people don't like that, well then, the game has changed for the worse.
The impression i have from other families is that youve played hard and dis-honorable
. I can agree with you that it might be better with a no-nap policy, but that is seperate from honor or not.. My point tho is that the moment you have some families playing honorably and some families not (this is ofc not a new thing) you cannot judge who was the best famly on size rankings anymore, since that simply concludes who took more planets from small families, althought this round we wouldnt have had the attackers even for that
.
noir i think the whole of MW knows that and its like even if 54 tops the size rankings no one will credit them with the win=P
Not really, round still dont finished.... and We hve actually war against them... ![]()
Very funny to see when one top family searched easy farming and now They using much resources and time for to search do it possible... ![]()
and I think They need much more time if They think it is possible. ![]()
.. Ok! Now I need to see one good arse of latin model... with three tetis... ![]()
middle, i miss your tenacity...make room for me next round ![]()
Was yesterday:
Rank Family Planets Networth Score
1 Warphabet (6654) [77,18] 4465 105764811 213231
12 Marvel Villains (6643) [52,99] 1620 72799227 104350
Now:
Uhmm how going this war...
Rank Family Planets Networth Score
1 Warphabet (6654) [77,18] 4325 106301939 219771
12 Marvel Villains (6643) [52,99] 1735 76395275 107477
Uhmm... I am seeing bad... or We are started farming them... ![]()
Good for you, you found one of our 8 players that have been inactive all round. Difficult.
If you family is top one size and have +4k planets and have "inactives" players... God! my family is "superactive" and have only -1700 planets... so We are noobs! ![]()
Well, we only had 3-4 active players all round so... yeah, guess thats the case
Uhmm very strange... one "inactive" with: 465 planets?
Inactive Z Partaxian 6412194gc 465
and now:
Inactive Z Partaxian 4412440gc 239
My guy is superactive and He has only 1 planet and possibly OB x 3000 of infra!
Hive306 Cimex hemipterus 35717gc 1
Ya really my family is noob.... ![]()
You think if he were active, that your bankers would have pop, or that you would have been able to raid him? Its been a disappointing round, can tell you that.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → What Family Done More Wars This MW Round?
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.