> xeno syndicated wrote:

> "start by answering one of the challenges instead of looking for a loophole."

I started exactly where you said you wanted to start, with your very first point: your claim that I don't respond to posts which prove ruinous to my ideas or philosophies.

Like you usually do, you will ignore empirical and rational proof of your fallacies, and resort to personal attacks and accusations.  So there is no point in discussing anything with you.  There is only one way I will continue this, and that is if you admit that on your first point presented, you are in error.  In addition, if you want me to continue this in a civil manner without resorting to personal attacks against you tit-for-tat, you could apologize for your false accusation against my character.

This is so true. Also applies to V.Kemp.