• Posts: 2,832
  • Tag points: 187

Re: 4702 vs 4689

lol see.. everyone wants u dead 02 u 2v1 people so why complain now? u know that and why fault 03? fault us u can say we lack this and we lack that nevertheless we are all coming for u.. plain and simple the fight will be nice for the first few days hopefully u could of had ur ally help but trying to be slick u dropped them hoping to split a alliance.. now u failed if i were u i'd really 92 and try and get some help from them.. or just randomly pick up someone u know 05 has some shares lol or how about umm 93 plenty of people to ally pick one and then u can say 2v2...

@Kollop
A day of savings yea right in ur dreams unless u mean a day for the active ones

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,810

Re: 4702 vs 4689

you forget what you did last round to my fam already Luster? we were having 1v1 and you jumped in with ur allies to make it a 2v1

This situation is almost identical to that. What goes around comes around mate smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,734
  • Tag points: 34

Re: 4702 vs 4689

> Deillll wrote:

> All this new ingame NAP is shit anyways. Old days were better when NAPs were on honour, some people had it, some don't. Thats why this game was so interesting and why it pissed people off, made everyone excited or whatever. You devote 4 months of your year to a round only to get fucked over by some nap breaking cockvag...thats why this game was awesome. Good guys, bad guys, NAP breaks, wars, 3v3s, 3v2s, 3v1s.

So whatever, 2v1 is whats up now.

big_smile





New ingame nap is shit? I think it's more of an honest system than before! You sign in game for the term, and then you cannot do any attacks before the limit is up. If anything it keeps nap breakers more honest.

Modestus Experitus

Arby: A very strict mod, reminds me of a fat redneck who drives a truck around all day with a beer in one hand. I hated this guy at the start, however, I played a round in PW with him where he went as an anonymous player. Our fam got smashed up and everyone pretty much left. Arby stayed around and helped out the remaining family. At the end of the round he revealed himself.... My views on him have changed since. Your a good guy.....

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Rin
  • Rin
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,907
  • Tag points: 21

Re: 4702 vs 4689

whos warring again?

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 184

Re: 4702 vs 4689

"New ingame nap is shit? I think it's more of an honest system than before! You sign in game for the term, and then you cannot do any attacks before the limit is up. If anything it keeps nap breakers more honest."

Thats exactly what i'm talking about, lol...honour system was better. NAP breaks were part of the game whether you liked it or not.

Smirnoff

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,236
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 4702 vs 4689

i LOL'd with Deill's post

NAP breaks were part of the game pfft, you sound like u must have broken quite afew in ur day

- The Galeonis Empire

[00:26] <&Walking_Corpse> mapgen doesn't work right for me
[00:26] <&Galeonis> yeah yeah same with ur penis tongue

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 184

Re: 4702 vs 4689

nah we usually played no NAPs. I probably did though i can't really recall for certain. Either way ingame NAPs are shit. Dynamics of personality, playstyle, good guys, bad guys are what made this game epic in the old days. The only reason i came back was because this game was so involving when i played, its like a period of my life haha. And everything played a part to it.

If we didn't have the dynamics of personality we've had in IC over the last decade the game would be shit.

Smirnoff

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,944
  • Tag points: 16

Re: 4702 vs 4689

i still haven't received any official cancellation from a leader or vice leader of 03. Fleet admirale sent me an official cancellation few ticks ago then few minutes later told me to forget his message. I dunno what to think about it...

@ IC Death: we have 1 day of saves now, it wasnt the case when we cancelled, when u have 3 days. Nice to see that u don't have the balls to fight us in a fair war and need to call allies knowing ur skills are under ours even with an upper hand for u. If u make ur first victory in the game it will be remembered forever lol

'Success! The realm of Genesis has been reduced to dust! Our forces are leaving the planet though, as it is scheduled for demolition to make way for a new hyperspace bypass.'

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,944
  • Tag points: 16

Re: 4702 vs 4689

Cash    159,197,244    Food    31,462,003

Iron    9,079,372    Morale    110%
Octarine    1,841,308    Special Ops    7
Endurium    4,593,573


lol rizzy stop lies this is fam bank

'Success! The realm of Genesis has been reduced to dust! Our forces are leaving the planet though, as it is scheduled for demolition to make way for a new hyperspace bypass.'

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,473
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 4702 vs 4689

to explain why i told you to disregard my message was because i had found out AA had sent you a cancelation earlier. it was a family decision

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,441

Re: 4702 vs 4689

lol btw ic death if u ahve NOTICED 03 HAS ONLY 2V1 EVERY1 THEY HAVE HHIT ALLLLLLLLLL ROUND SO GET UR SHITTY FACTS STRAIGHT put it this way 03 cudnt fight their way out of a paper bag without their allies help so yeah oh and btw death i wud f**k u so hard if it was 1v1 u wud be crying to ur allies within 10 ticks of us 1v1 anyway so its ok its just funny that we hit 91 with a 3v1 once in the round and we r the bad guys but 03 has done it numerous times and nothing is said so yeah please get ur facts stright

<Parrot> i bet if we asked random ic population they will know luster more than genesis

IF YOU WANT IT COME AND GET IT CAUSE ILL BE WAITING WITH MY ARMY TO SLAUGHTER YOURS

LuStEr

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 184

Re: 4702 vs 4689

this will be our numerous time luster we have a a day and a half before we're the bad guys tongue

Smirnoff

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

63 Reply by Kollop (edited by Walking Corpse 19-Mar-2011 17:01:43)

  • Posts: 2,944
  • Tag points: 16

Re: 4702 vs 4689

Leader and vice leaders tags are to give indications to other fams, that they know to who they can talk to or not. I could have sent my cancellation to a 89 bottom guy and have attacked in 48h... I sent to leader and VL and published it in UNI that all fam members have a chance to prepare. I expected the same respect from 03! I did'nt expect a [keep personal attacks out of it], bottom of his fam without tag, sends me a cancellation message to represent his great familly in a 2vs1

'Success! The realm of Genesis has been reduced to dust! Our forces are leaving the planet though, as it is scheduled for demolition to make way for a new hyperspace bypass.'

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,441

Re: 4702 vs 4689

lol bryon dont even try talk urself up u were good once mate back i nthe day until u attack and prove u r as good as u  use to be sit down and stfu and let the big boys talk

<Parrot> i bet if we asked random ic population they will know luster more than genesis

IF YOU WANT IT COME AND GET IT CAUSE ILL BE WAITING WITH MY ARMY TO SLAUGHTER YOURS

LuStEr

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,034

Re: 4702 vs 4689

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhyeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet!

"A choice from the gods, is as useless as the gods themselves"

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,441

Re: 4702 vs 4689

hellraizer my lil biddy bitch big_smile love u bro tongue and


ahhhhhhhhhh shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhyyyyyeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet!!!!!!!!!!

<Parrot> i bet if we asked random ic population they will know luster more than genesis

IF YOU WANT IT COME AND GET IT CAUSE ILL BE WAITING WITH MY ARMY TO SLAUGHTER YOURS

LuStEr

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,744
  • Tag points: 70

Re: 4702 vs 4689

> twosidedeath wrote:

> to explain why i told you to disregard my message was because i had found out AA had sent you a cancelation earlier. it was a family decision


you have already posted in this thread, you already knew what was going on... keep lies to yourself and let your leader handle diplomacy smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,734
  • Tag points: 34

Re: 4702 vs 4689

That's it! im done with this crap talk about 2v1. Bring it on. I can't declare on you all, so im letting everyone know now. family 4697 declares war on all of mw. Bring it. I bet you can't touch family 4697. We are too good! Be scared! RAWR!

Modestus Experitus

Arby: A very strict mod, reminds me of a fat redneck who drives a truck around all day with a beer in one hand. I hated this guy at the start, however, I played a round in PW with him where he went as an anonymous player. Our fam got smashed up and everyone pretty much left. Arby stayed around and helped out the remaining family. At the end of the round he revealed himself.... My views on him have changed since. Your a good guy.....

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,866
  • Tag points: 1

Re: 4702 vs 4689

since when were 2v1s not allowed, as long as the second fam is allied to the first?? Its called good play!

If you have fail allies that dont help = your problem
If you ditched your allies in an attempt to save your own ass (Once again) = Your problem.

Its been brought to the attention of Uni news, pucker up bishes! Better get shit sorted on your own diplo 02, rush to find some allies and get shit sorted quickly or cop it - End of story.

"I lie down next to an angel, fall asleep and fly with the demons"
I once prayed to god for some planets, but quickly found out he didnt work that way

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

70 Reply by Galeonis (edited by Tensai 19-Mar-2011 05:53:21)

  • Posts: 1,236
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 4702 vs 4689

"its just funny that we hit 91 with a 3v1 once in the round and we r the bad guys but 03 has done it numerous times and nothing is said so yeah please get ur facts stright"

oh luster when are u gonna stop slapping urself in the face?

u said 02 has 2v1 many times ok, which seems reasonable since 2 = an alliance which is normal, 3v1s are just retarded, i wonder if any1 else will cancel on u guys now and give u a taste of a 4some

but what you guys did was deceive us by lying to us to get shares saying u wouldnt attack so we didnt bother wasting morale to clear u right then while we were in a war with 01, then ur alliance goes and jumps my fam making it 3v1

thats why ur bad, and u did shit for attacking u had so much fleet and yet orbit did more dmg o.O

- The Galeonis Empire

[00:26] <&Walking_Corpse> mapgen doesn't work right for me
[00:26] <&Galeonis> yeah yeah same with ur penis tongue

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,832
  • Tag points: 187

Re: 4702 vs 4689

lol

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,096

Re: 4702 vs 4689

this thread is already a mess, really stop the mud throwing, and have a good war.

Fremen Forever!

1       M00lar Ftw (1431)       5165pl      129971306nw

0 Dislike 0 Post Points