OFC one of my players has to delete after galaxy closes

if they are inactives, they not gonna do you any good anyway? i think its good, now all these pussy deleters who get in a temper tantrum can't rejoin and just look to bugger up other people's rounds.

> Lee wrote:

> u can still have a core agreement within a CF.

if the galaxy was bigger then yeh no naps but even still how do u end a war, seems flawed.

lets add core clauses...
maybe add a 48h notice clause as well... or possibly 72h, maybe make it permanent...
then we might as well add swap outs and a compensation clause...
maybe we should add an ingame system that prevents fams from attacking each other...

i call it the 48h cf, the 72h cf and the perm cf!

lets make it something like, 6-10 families, having a cluster of 10-20 systems dirrectly around them. and then outside that cluster there is possibly randoms or no systems at all with a distance of 4 tics between the family clusters and 6-8 tics to the koth cluster. once entering the koth cluster all families can be killed off. no agreements of any kind, shared systems without conflict should be investigated. and for a kicker have something like every other planet in KOTH be a morale planet. this part is obviously not needed but could be fun

reasons i say this are, the clusters around the families are obvious, it makes for even planets for families to build thier infra up and not have to worry a lot about early wars,

also if it were just that family was HC when they expoed into the KOTH systems its obvious what would happen, that family would be raped by everyone else.

1) Fams should be allowed to fight eachother
2) Fams should be allowed to protect themselves by securing some peace agreement

So, a Core NAP is the only nap allowed. The core NAP allows a maximum of 10 systems to be protected, anything outside of those systems is up for grabs. This allows big fams to have a good core and grow which they want to, but also means the big fams will have to fight eachother, they cant simply have all out peace between eachother.

This would be ideal if two fams are placed close together, they can protect there main infra but they can fight for spread/positioning. Plus many other benefits

thats why there needs to be no morale than wars end quicker..
and you should be able to kill ppol of then rounds are shorter..

Next time, make it so leaders have to pick their fam out of player pool.. and make it hc imo

> Spange Bab wrote:

> whatever happened to my favorite "imperial savings and loan" rounds

Lee is pushing hard to bring them to the koth map

A lot of people are posting ideas but not explaining why they should be implemented.

Why should the map be bigger?
Why should the hill only consist of 4 systems?
Why should ds be disabled in the hill?

I agree on a few things.  No cf's or naps should be allowed, why would they be?  Naps ruin this game, i hate them and i personally feel like they should be completely disallowed.  All they have ever done is keep large families from having to fight each other until one of them deems it convenient.
The amount of "clean" systems available to each family should be evened out, and the distance to the hill should be even.  It seems like with the circular system this should be very close to equal, but it might not be quite there.
Serenity, there is no point whatsoever in disallowing ingames between families.  One way or another, people will find a way to talk.

simple way to get around DS, go and kill the other families economy, ruin their infra and take all their planets. then, go for the DS, by this time, you'll be a lot bigger, then you can DU and get enough bombers to kill the lasers. takes time but some wars do take time.

We need more Dpenguins....Make the changes.

Yeah i know flashy. it's the hard way though