Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

We will attack there allies to Henkie smile

And Flashy.. Stop playing the underdog... I am shiting my pants and crying in the corner that i will loose all my dear planets..

<&Nolio> when NZ had their earthquake
<&Nolio> I hoped Luster was trapped somewhere

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

Really what is the problem..
Specialists Camaar 2299505gc 63
Killas Camaar 411725gc 58
Dark Templar My Life For Aiur 145318gc 53
HappyJedi Jedi Force 2004970gc 75
Marijuana ADdiCtivE 1400969gc 79
TYMO OMYT 1174854gc 228
Ariana Kaze.version2 907888gc 96
Look at that lineup!

VS
Khor, Brett, Smackone and DEATHSTAR

Its not about cash these warrs.. Its about morale.. If you dont have morale you cant attack..

<&Nolio> when NZ had their earthquake
<&Nolio> I hoped Luster was trapped somewhere

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

drama drama drama... just shut up and fight this war, i wanna watch sad

Maar doodslaan deed hij niet, want tussen droom en daad,
Staan wetten in de weg en praktische bezwaren,
En ook weemoedigheid, die niemand kan verklaren,
En die des avonds komt, wanneer men slapen gaat.

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

> Chickenwingz wrote:

> drama drama drama... just shut up and fight this war, i wanna watch sad


Thanks!

<&Nolio> when NZ had their earthquake
<&Nolio> I hoped Luster was trapped somewhere

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

> Tja wrote:

> We will attack there allies to Henkie smile

And Flashy.. Stop playing the underdog... I am shiting my pants and crying in the corner that i will loose all my dear planets..


Dude howmany times is it posted already? 3458 is at war with 3447 and will not fight in this "alliance war". Also, Tymo is a resourcer so it's more like:

Bankers/resourcers

VS

Khor, Brett, Smackone and DEATHSTAR

And after 4 ticks or so:

Ariana
HJ
Flashy

VS

Khor, Brett, Smackone and DEATHSTAR

56

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

You are missing Icer which happens to be the most valuable attacker in 52

And please dont count Specialist, Killas, DT in , they wont be there wink

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

Stop the whining already! To the ones who are talking about the cancelation date, I cancel whenever its better for me and allies to cancel, I'm not going to delay this war any longer, I could even canceled this nap as soon as war with 48/61 was done but I prefered to give u guys some days to save, also you guys knew we were going to war sooner or later cause Metrex even talked to Ariana and told him we would. Now about 58, this is an alliance nap so we need to cancel on both fams, when we cancel and my main target is 48.

1     We will earn our Immortality!! (3449) [14,15]      2368      29040743      183556
2     Thx for playing with SPARTA! (3452) [20,56]     2836     26566181     209991

1 Khorinis LionHeart Legacy 130 13420223 big_smile

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

It's fairly easy to call it "drama, drama"  and "whining" when you are in 49/52 but facts are facts. If by some miracle we manage to surivive without logging in and retal then don't expect any mercy from me but exactly the same treatment.

I will now stop "whining" and "drama drama"

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

Oh and btw Chickenwingz, I remember you were crying in uni when our allies did 2 DS checks so stfu seriously

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

oh if this was the other way round im sure you guys would be saying the same things...


and ffs, how many times have i written this, I WANT THIS WAR, so stop saying it won't be fought, also, the drama adds to it all so suck it up

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

"Khor, Brett, Smackone and DEATHSTAR"

hahahhahahaa

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

also, Tja, i love underdog situation, means that if i lose, it was expected, if we come up with a plan and screw you guys over, you will look silly, me, i got nothing to lose wink

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

Tommie is good also wink

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

> Sabaoon2 wrote:

> Oh and btw Chickenwingz, I remember you were crying in uni when our allies did 2 DS checks so stfu seriously

lmao! i was being ironic... why would i have whined about a war i had lost beforehand. i'd been makign jokes about my war for some time, thought you'd know that'd be a joke as well.

Maar doodslaan deed hij niet, want tussen droom en daad,
Staan wetten in de weg en praktische bezwaren,
En ook weemoedigheid, die niemand kan verklaren,
En die des avonds komt, wanneer men slapen gaat.

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

> Render wrote:

> > Smack My chicken wrote:

> > Flash[light]ning wrote:

> point here is, 52 are violating nap terms set when we signed the nap, if they haven't removed these naps violations then the nap is void... simple as that, the nap stand with both 49/52 so that would mean the nap wit 49/52 is VOID, so sort your asses out as we have been asking for those planets for a long while now.

i want a clean war! even if it is one sided, i will still fight it


war will be clean, defences will be removed. Only one attacker doesn't seem to hand in. Tough they are getting his planets smile Our family member DEATHSTAR managed to defend planet 16 in the 45,53 system against an attack by forces from HappyJedi, family 3448. So I have faith in both LFA and HJ to sort it out and get this planets back where they belong, to 48.


As leader of 52 i apoligise for the core violations and give my word when I say Ill try to get them back asap to you guys.

Ty
=====================================

SmackOne dont make me post here, I am waiting a msg from you saying 'defenses removed' from a long ago, I know your intentions are good and it's your fam members who are lame, but talking about voiding naps, ours could be perfectly voided by now, only thing stopping me from doing it is
1 I am not that kind of a player
2 We are already at war to look for more trouble.

But honestly, using spots in our core to attack 48 when those planets are meant to be traded is not fair imo, overall when you're going 2 vs 1.

If you really want a FAIR war, some important trades should be done before it starts. I am neutral to this war, but dont want my core to be a battle zone for you guys while I sit and watch enemy fleets crossing the skies from east to west and people building lasertraps in it and such.
The same goes to 48, they have still to honour our nap, and you guys can go to war in the shares you earned out of our nap terms, ok? wink


your core? wtf

66 (edited by Smack My chicken 09-May-2010 18:27:53)

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

> Sabaoon2 wrote:

> > Tja wrote:

> BULLSHIT!

You guys were planning this war, you guys saw how we cleared out 47 so easy and got scared or smt.. You guys should have dropt 61 and prepared for us streight away.. And do i need to bring up last round with HJ and tryme? This is so lame....

Or do you guys wanna do a eor jump? *does a chicken dance*




Lol I laughed when I read this.

1. You guys have been saving for 3 days straight after our war with 61 while we were doing infra jumps, so don't tell me you haven't been planning this.
2. If you guys weren't scared like shit of us then you would have done a 1 vs 1.
3. If you guys weren't scared like shit of us then you would have extended the war date.

IMO 52 does not deserve to be called a true winner since all they have done is infrawhore
IMO 49 does not deserve to be called a true winner since they do everything they can not to fight us 1 vs 1 .

I was so looking forward to this war, it was going to be epic but this just sucks.

We only infrawhored eh? If it weren't for us (and 47 as well tongue always takes 2 big_smile) stupid and silly behaviour of useless big fleets and breaking eachothers ports, us and 47 would still be like twice as big as you guys, so cut the crap tongue

I do agree that we have not warred as I would've liked to. That is to blame at me, because of inactivity... BUT 47 f**ked with our spread that much we hadn't had any spread left.. how to attack then?

*sigh

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

Btw, underdog? we are like 10 times as inactive =

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

dude your fam has best infra of PW how can you say ur inactive lol! Our bankers are much more inactive than yours I can tell you that.

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

wheres that queer polder at? getting beat up i hope

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

> ~*~Serenity~*~ wrote:

> 49/52 are trying to play this off like we're actually on equal footing for this war. In reality, theyre simply vultures and NAP violators.


I don't recall having a : nap can not be canceled if one of the fams is in a war with another family in the galaxy clause so how do we violate the nap in that sense? 

it's basicly thinking logical. we warred 47 already and sure there are plenty small familie's to hit but then it would be: 49/52 are farming.

so we have choice to either attack a more or less equal in size fam that made the mistake of not forseeing a war and simply warring 47( and I picked up somewhere they denied a napoffer.)
or farming some poor lowerranked family into oblivion just to be able to keep our size growing.


at the very best it's simply picking the lesser of 2 evils if you're hellbound on finding fault in us.

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

> ~*~Serenity~*~ wrote:

> 49/52 are trying to play this off like we're actually on equal footing for this war. In reality, theyre simply vultures and NAP violators.


Dude.. Really... They should have ben started to go to war against 47 again. They knew we were waiting. The round is almost gone.. What were we supose to do? A EOR jump? That would be uber lame.. And they will kick our behinds..

<&Nolio> when NZ had their earthquake
<&Nolio> I hoped Luster was trapped somewhere

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

> Tja wrote:

> > ~*~Serenity~*~ wrote:

> 49/52 are trying to play this off like we're actually on equal footing for this war. In reality, theyre simply vultures and NAP violators.


Dude.. Really... They should have ben started to go to war against 47 again. They knew we were waiting. The round is almost gone.. What were we supose to do? A EOR jump? That would be uber lame.. And they will kick our behinds..


it's seems like your either missing the whole point or playing ignorant. If you have no idea what im talking about then please re-read what I posted earlier

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

serenity you really need to read better or get those goggles off of your face.


it's simple. yes we cancel nap with 48/58 because it's a alliance nap. we cancel this nap according to it's nap rules.


and the fact that 58 is in a war with 47 is their fault. read this topic:

both parties knew that war was imminent, both parties now EOR date

heck there even been discussions saying we plan on warring them.

then 58 goes and wars 47 and later declines a napoffer. all the while deliberately staying blind to our fams.

we can not be hold responsible for 58's mistakes or actions. they wanted war so bad. they could have just cancelled on us and no prob. but instead they decided to war 47.
now they dug themself in to this they' are trying to make us look like the bad guys for doing what whas going to happen anyhow.

our actions were set and they knew war was coming. they decided to war 47 despite that and now this?

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

dude 3447 was the one who declared on 3458 not the other way around. Declining nap offer 3458 found unreasonable has nothing to do with this either so I don't understand why you are mentioning that really. Also if fam A is in war with fam B and Fam C cancels on fam A then they are vulturing, no matter how you look at it or try to twist it with stuff like "you could have seen it coming! or otherwise we would be farmining!" This is exactly the same situation, the only difference now is the fact that this is an allience nap.

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

i go sleep and there are 2 pages of crap lol i cant be screwd reading it all

IMO 49 does not deserve to be called a true winner since they do everything they can not to fight us 1 vs 1 .

sabaoon2 you say this but HJ was the one that taught me to work with my allies under any circumstances.. so yeah

anyway theres no point whining about this it was inevitable.. if HJ had been straight up with me about finnishing his war with 61 and thats it instead of "cancelling" on 47 we woulda given sufficent time to recover but as Flashy told me 48 has done maaaassive infrawhoring within that time and basically stalled lol.

so i think its pretty fair.. if 58 dont choose to take part we wont care.. but its prooly in your best interest to help each other and finnish off with 47.. buts that all from me sort of..

i suggest 49ers / 52ers not to post much stuff in here theres still a fair bit of time to go through and who knows we might screw up like flashy did first tick:p

no point getting flamed for what we are doing when we know what we are doing an khor has taken a lot of time to think about the time to cancel and you whiners... about the time lol thats the advantage of cancelling first we get to fight you when WE want..

good luck to both sides smile

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex