2,451

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

"Obey?

Uhhhh....i'm not sure where this Obey comes from."

it's in the part where they win the election and then become the government and start passing laws and stuff

2,452

(16 replies, posted in General)

" I don't know how many court cases that i've seen where a woman, was brutally beaten by their boyfriend or husband...and she decided NOT to press charges.  Depending on each states indidivual law, even though it's Assault and Battery many men were released from custody.  I"m not saying every city, county and state legistlature is going to let that slide, but some places do."

That's surefire prosecution in CA after Nicole Brown Simpson was not brutally murdered by not-OJ Simpson, who had beat her up and every time cops came out she refused to prosecute.  So that's a very common example out here.  Also prostitution...who's the complaining victim there? Or drug cases?  The offended party is the State.

2,453

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

And you're very generous with the learning curve, aren't you?  "That was my opportunity to learn something, and, if somebody else feels they were the victim, it's their growth opportunity to move on from caring too much about such things...if they refuse to grow and get stuck in the past, sucks for them"

2,454

(5 replies, posted in General)

http://a2.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/644736_344189585673790_697358260_n.jpg

2,455

(16 replies, posted in General)

hahha Tom Cruise bouncing on a couch

lazy cops like to say they can't prosecute...they also like to say it's a civil matter not a crime...but when an immigrant says "no no I won't prosecute that street gang" in my state they still come down on hard

2,456

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

if the universe is a cosmic accident why do I care what you think? Disperse into "God Particles" from whence you sprang. tongue

2,457

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

Ok is that a constituitonal amendment or a statute? Because the Amendments give the states powers not allocated to the federal government and the federal government has never, ever forbade a governor to raise a militia.

Even at Little Rock where the gov. of Arkansas threatened to use state militia to prevent desegregation, Ike's response was to call out the 101st Airborne, not to forbid the muster of a state militia.

2,458

(16 replies, posted in General)

"Nope. The victim can release the perpatrator by pressing no charges within a 24 hour span.  The state only takes over if the perpetrator can be proven to be a physical threat to himself or others.  And that usually only happens in cases where the perpatrator was found to be mentally incompetent to stand trial."

Wrong. In a criminal case the prosecution is always, the government.  In a felony case, especially a "violent" one like burglary, the prosecutor can proceed even if the "victim" refuses to cooperate.  That's why OJ is in prison even though the collector he robbed said he didn't want OJ to get convicted.

>>Might be something as stupid as family or friend, being drunk and getting into the house.  That I would believe, mostly because who else would have access to the estate and house.  With keys or code to enter the house, and not be able to set off any of the alarms?  Besides the people that installed the alarms.  That would be sad.<<

Or not, as, there's absolutely no evidence of any of that.  Maybe it was Natalie Wood?

2,459

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

Where's the "federal limit"?  Never heard of it.  State militias were raised for the Indian Wars, and the Spanish war, and even after the Dick Act for riots and such.  the "national guard" was created in the National Defense Act of 1916

2,460

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

Because if they don't respect God, those of us who do, probably shouldn't obey them.

2,461

(16 replies, posted in General)

Actually no they don't have to let him go.  It might make it hard to go forward but in the tough cities just because a witness refuses to testify doesn't mean a felony case gets dropped.

2,462

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

but the governor can keep raising state militais like mushrooms

2,463

(11 replies, posted in General)

neelix was the ship's whore

2,464

(16 replies, posted in General)

If the cops are quoted as saying they'll press a charge then I doubt it was a hoax

2,465

(4 replies, posted in General)

haha I guess you solved it by getting somebody to wake you

2,466

(6 replies, posted in Politics)

holy shit where IS Perot?

You know he tried a commando raid to get the hostages out of Iran in 1979?

I think he may be preparing to capture Obama and Romney at the debates yikes

2,467

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

good lesson on the "living constitution"

Militia were a state power since the beginning.  State Militia "augmented" federal forces and were 2/3 of US forces in every war up to Spanish War.  By the time of the invasion of Cuba, magazine-loading rifles meant that nobody was making cartridges on the spot like at Bunker Hill...they had to have factory made ammo in the right size, at hand, immediately.  Since every state used a different rifle it meant NY Militia had to use NY ammo and CA militia hand to use CA ammo and neither could use federal US Army ammo.  No problem, just make sure the boxcars stayed with the passenger freight, right?

The invasion force at Tampico was supplied by a 1 track rail line.  Nobody got their own bags.

After this fiasco the Dick Act of 1906 offered states federal arsenals and armories and uniforms in exchange for federalized training of militias into fully-compatible forces.  This was reinforced by the National Defense Acts of 1917 and 1947 which gave them the same ranks and jobs as the federal military, and assigned state units set tasks within the federal military.

All this means, some 100 years later, you imagine that state militias are over.

But the practice of 100 years of -statute- cannot erase the Constitution.  Every state governor can raise a militia independent of the Feds.

2,468

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

er no, he was the drunk driver
I think his last words were
AAAA AAAA! AAAAAAAA!

2,469

(9 replies, posted in General)

only a romulan would ignore batman's challenge to fight hand to hand

your facts are racist

2,471

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

we BEEN doing that it's called state militias

"The United States had two armies during the 19th century. The first, a standing army commonly referred to as the U.S. Army, had been authorized by the Congress in 1789. Designated the regular army, this force was composed of officers commissioned by Congress and enlisted men who joined for a five year period. In 1792, Congress created a second army intended as an auxiliary to the regulars called the militia. One major difference between the regulars and militia was the first was a national force while the second was the armies of the various states. Congress stipulated three instances when the militia could be called into federal service: to execute the laws of the United States, to suppress insurrections, and to repel invasions. This two-tiered arrangement formed the basis of the American military establishment during the Mexican War."

2,472

(8 replies, posted in General)

boondock saints is a pretty good movie

2,473

(2,141 replies, posted in General)

your photo doesn't show his rank so I'm left with an actor, playing some kinda Marine with a fat service record, testifying

2,474

(9 replies, posted in General)

yes that's essential for Adam West

2,475

(26 replies, posted in Community)

Although for all our mockery, ask a Dutchman where to get a beer and they actually tell you what's fun to do over there