> xeno syndicated wrote:
> What is magical about a fully-automated rice farm? The technology to have it is already available. Why don't we have robots freeing rice-pickers to do some other form of labor? We have used robots to free welders.
Why haven't we freed starving subsistence farmers with robot technology?
I think the answer is because of our vision of how the economy should run. Our vision is that in order for our economy to function, we need to have a large portion of the population living in poverty. The economic system we have developed depends on there being poverty.
However, this is a fallacy. Our way of life needs not be supported by exploitation of subsistence workers; our way of life needs not depend on human slavery.
Where did we get this idea, I wonder?
I'd just like to see a change in trend to free the subsistence laborers of the world with robots, freeing them to pursue a better life.
we dont chain people to a farm and force them to work there. they work there because its the best option for them.
we dont have the technology to fully automate rice farms. and even if they did, it would cost insane amounts of money to build and upkeep.
capitalism makes better systems pervail. once robotics is the better system, it will come into being.
how about you answer my point? why do you think reducing human labor would make the world any better? why do you think people reading conspiracy theories and mmorpg's online all day is better then an honest day's work?