1,776

(183 replies, posted in Universal News)

Haha, josh u suck.

You got smashed in a 1v2.

Your skills have deteriorated.

Stick to WoW!

1,777

(183 replies, posted in Universal News)

no, Matrix = Metrex's wife

1,778

(17 replies, posted in Ideas)

Elro <3

+ rep

1,779

(9 replies, posted in Questions)

Isn't the idea to move away from solo-play?

The point, I believe, is to encourage more attackers to get involved and start being useful. 

Imo, it's pretty stupid to have a 'super attacker' in a fam, with so much fleet and 20-30 morales and he can just do w/e he wants.  Especially in light of the new Sentinel Tag, he could attack anyone in any fam, and not have to worry about morale.

Perhaps it benefits Drafted fams vs undrafted ones ...but at least theres a need now for more attackers, ranged at different networths, to actually do something - just like how it was in the days of no morale planets.

1,780

(156 replies, posted in Universal News)

As per the definition, to coordinate times like this, it 'would' be an IA.

1,781

(156 replies, posted in Universal News)

To add to the max loss then, you need people to have same fleets.  Cos if you wanna have a pure 2v2v2, then fams can't be disadvantaged with having inferior savings or fleet.

Same savings to build whatever composition fleet u want/need - now that'd be cool.

And if that seems silly to you, then, for the same reasonings, you shouldn't put restrictions on who attacks who and how much.

1,782

(156 replies, posted in Universal News)

If i had a cent, for everytime you didn't care about IC, AA, I'd be a rich rich man sad

1,783

(156 replies, posted in Universal News)

+1

1,784

(14 replies, posted in Ideas)

> Alundra wrote:

> what needs to be fixed is I want to be able to select all and hit 700%, then I want my empties to go to FB, my FB to go to 100% and so on and so forth




http://www.imperialconflict.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=140559

You forgot yourself and Nolio were active members/supporters of that fam too.  Don't be a hypocrite, by excluding yourself.

Regardless, rules can change, and in my opinion, this is a rule for the better of new players. ...well, at least a step towards it.

However, it's going to be really hard for them to enforce.  For example, at what point do you say someone needs to be removed due to their inactivity.  Inactivity hurts a fam, if another fam targets them for raids/infiltrations etc often the fam suffers - a lot.  So, often you need to remove players yourself.  BUT ....where do you draw that line? No logins in a week?  One login a day?  Only 6 hours active a day?  It can get absurd.

I do agree with you, that the new rule post if a bit vague and some clarifications should be posted.

1,786

(11 replies, posted in Ideas)

I don't like it.

Means you only need one person in the fam who can infil, really.  Making other people/players having the op redundant. 

More importantly, communication would be cut down too, and IC needs to move away from that thinking.  It's fun in wars and other times when you are cooperating with your family members and allies etc to get infils and things.  If you can't find someone to do the ops for you, if they're not online to update or whatever....then, imo, that should be part of the game.

Fams are constructed (or at least to be) on what ops are needed, who can do them, coverage, etc etc.  We shouldn't lose that kinda team play.

1,787

(6 replies, posted in Questions)

It's onhand resources that are lost.

Bureaucracy = for gc
Decay = for resources

Every tick it's 0.5% loss of what gc/resource you have on you at tick time.

1,788

(872 replies, posted in Universal News)

Tis the only reason some of us play tongue

1,789

(106 replies, posted in Universal News)

> Drax of Terigon wrote:

> can u believe this guy. he's marked half my fam rogue again. wardog only joined few hours ago. and bara wanted the rogue rule changed. pffft the irony of it all.




Pretty sure those guys who marked Rogue, are inactive or don't care.  Else you all would have voted in a new leader.

1,790

(872 replies, posted in Universal News)

Inactive     Baratheon     Blue Light     3673530gc    263    [ONLINE]
Inactive     SCK     Revalons     84301gc    34    
Fleet Admiral     Terigon     total loons     41385gc    9    [ONLINE]


You are not marked rogue?  And you are still the leader.  I guess Mizzle was just trying to say stop stopping people from playing the game.  If you suspect someone of a multi - report it to a Mod as opposed to taking measures into your own hands.

I suppose you think it's your own responsibility to help the IC community.  We cannot fault your excellence for this.

1,791

(872 replies, posted in Universal News)

Finally this set of mods doing stuff for the community and not just enforcing rules to the letter.

Good move smile

Baratheon can play the way he likes.  He just shouldn't screw over his own fam members.

1,792

(25 replies, posted in Universal News)

^ Tag Point

1,793

(872 replies, posted in Universal News)

yikes nice move by LG yikes

1,794

(872 replies, posted in Universal News)

> Baratheon wrote:

> I have nothing to be guilty of but excellence.




...stealing for siggie

As your true status as the IC Legend, you have taken it upon yourself to teach the n00b attackers of IC.  For this we are eternally grateful.  The mods had removed Virgo because it was inefficient at teaching people and since the Legend had returned, this was a good replacement.

We pray that all our kids may learn the true art of IC Legendness from you.

My propositon to you, is to convince those that are still disbelievers in your skill and ability (they are disgrace to our IC Community), to play out the remainder of the round to finally prove to all....as not only a Legend...

but...the all time...

IC Sentinel.

1,796

(5 replies, posted in Questions)

Wait for the announcement f00l tongue

1,797

(872 replies, posted in Universal News)

lol Whiteshadow ...nice

In the last 48 hrs you guys have gained 600 planets tongue

1,798

(19 replies, posted in Universal News)

Bring back Andro imo

1,799

(19 replies, posted in Universal News)

oh nvm...u were using silly score hmm

7     League of Uglies (5507) [75,114]     1713     13685761     66479

14     {FKaTheme} (5526) [29,109]     876     6666734     47648

1,800

(19 replies, posted in Universal News)

4 ranks = double nw/size? yikes

MW kinda sucks tongue